Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 14607. (Read 26609885 times)
February 11, 2018, 05:54:58 PM
#thepenismightierthanthesword
February 11, 2018, 05:45:27 PM
1. Bitcoin is not diving
2. Bitcoin is not mooning
3. No/Little hacks reported
4. LN still growing consistently (+700 channels from last week) https://p2sh.info/dashboard/db/lightning-network?orgId=1
5. SegWit adoptions growing http://segwit.party/charts/#
6. Mempool looks drained (recommeded 50 satoshis/byte) https://dedi.jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#30dhttps://estimatefee.com/
= WO goes WWII o_0.
I like and do not like this.
2. Bitcoin is not mooning
3. No/Little hacks reported
4. LN still growing consistently (+700 channels from last week) https://p2sh.info/dashboard/db/lightning-network?orgId=1
5. SegWit adoptions growing http://segwit.party/charts/#
6. Mempool looks drained (recommeded 50 satoshis/byte) https://dedi.jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#30dhttps://estimatefee.com/
= WO goes WWII o_0.
I like and do not like this.
February 11, 2018, 05:39:17 PM
8185 gonna get broken soon
The neeto thing about using a sockpuppet is the lack of accountability... If you happen to be right you can prance around gloating. But when you are wrong, you can just slink back into the shadows, and fire up the next sock puppet for round 2. Or 3... or 300?
But your screenshot gives us some clues
Running win 7 with a minimalist win95 sort of theme and firefox. Makes you late forties... early 50s. And how's the weather in New Zealand? Because I know it would be pretty damn cold there in that part of Russia that Ms. Palin can see from her back porch.
So according to you, no-one should make price predictions, because they may offend you, or be correct?? (and that would offend you too)
And while you are trashing my screenshot , please do explain in detail what you consider either incorrect or inaccurate , or even non importance (with reasoning) , otherwise your bitter BS just became even more transparent.
Here, here's a nice fresh cup of crushed bull soul on ice...do enjoy
February 11, 2018, 05:38:14 PM
Hitler was a retard when it came to military science. His strategies were terrible, and his micromanagement was even worse. If he would've left the war to the generals, most of Eurasia would be speaking German now.
Uncle Adolf was a plant of the (((usual suspects)))
http://whale.to/b/hallet_b.html
planted there to lead Germany to suicide against the (((Soviet Union))) exactly as it happened. And until you don't get over it no one other of the many funny things of WW2 make any sense.
Are you hearing me R0ach?
And that's why they allowed him to escape and no one cared about him later.
https://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Released-CIA-Files-Hitler-Survived-WWII-Lived-in-Colombia-20171031-0034.html
February 11, 2018, 05:27:12 PM
Has anyone watched a TV lately? You will see 4 commercials in a row and every single one them has the most unlikely demographic to ever exist: a white man married to a black woman? HAHA. White men don't even want to get married to white women anymore, yet the Jews think they can trick white men into marrying black women? The Jews waging war against whites propaganda is so bad now it's comical. The propaganda has the exact opposite effect they're going for. Instead of convincing whites to all suicide by marrying sheboons, they ask "who the fuck is making these commericals?", then look them up and see it's all Jews.
Black men don't even want black women. And that's how you know all this talk about racism is bullshit: People live according to what they believe, not what they say they believe. There is not one politically correct anti-racist white person who lives in a majority black area. 
February 11, 2018, 05:19:51 PM
Has anyone watched a TV lately? You will see 4 commercials in a row and every single one them has the most unlikely demographic to ever exist: a white man married to a black woman? HAHA. White men don't even want to get married to white women anymore, yet the Jews think they can trick white men into marrying black women? The Jews waging war against whites propaganda is so bad now it's comical. The propaganda has the exact opposite effect they're going for. Instead of convincing whites to all suicide by marrying sheboons, the propaganda is so bad it just instantly alerts everyone they are under attack by propaganda and to go find out who is creating it, then noticing...it's ALL Jews.
February 11, 2018, 05:11:15 PM
Oh cool, war talk!
Where's that story about the elephant and the ants? I know some elephants avoid plants that have ants, but they don't bring down the elephants.
I think it was something said during the war. Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers).
Please stop repeating nonsense someone told you before you at least check the facts once. If you bothered to do that, you would find:
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)
Does this look to you like elephant and ants? Something else was the reason why Soviets defeated Hitler, and it's not the number of soldiers.
The ruski numbers are way higher (why does this need pointing out?). So yeah, ants. Also, they were in the r phase of the cultural cycle during the war, so they definitely relied more on numbers than quality. Some of their soldiers were tasked with shooting anyone who fled from the front lines, for fucks sake.
Where's that story about the elephant and the ants? I know some elephants avoid plants that have ants, but they don't bring down the elephants.
I think it was something said during the war. Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers).
Please stop repeating nonsense someone told you before you at least check the facts once. If you bothered to do that, you would find:
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)
Does this look to you like elephant and ants? Something else was the reason why Soviets defeated Hitler, and it's not the number of soldiers.
Repeating nonsense will not make it true. On what do you base your claims these numbers are not true? It's common reaction not tot accept the facts when facts doesn't suite your prejudices and beliefs. Smart people rather question their beliefs then questions the facts. Doubt is good, it's a source of knowledge.
Happened that I'm tired arguing with you about obvious. You stated:
Quote
Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers)
and I've shoved you the figures that in 1944 when the Germans where truly defeated there were 3,370,000 Hitler's fighters confronted to 6,425,000 Soviet fighters. If that complies with your definition of one elephant vs huge number of ants then I'm out of the discussion. You are right that those 3,3M fighters had better technology, were better trained, had superior command infrastructure and still they are defeated by 6.4M fighters. It certainly was not the "ant psychology" that gained victory with such less then 1:2 number difference.Guys...
http://ww2f.com/
please
February 11, 2018, 05:11:05 PM
Possible slingshot bitcoin crash ahead
Quote
Armstrong is definitely thinking a further crash of everything into a SLINGSHOT move to the upside.
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!
Shelby thinks we're not depressed enough
In fact, demeanor is a significant reason I don’t think we’ve bottomed yet. There’s far too much optimism still. A bottom comes when everyone becomes very pessimistic. The fact that the shitcoins are leading Bitcoin is very weird and perhaps very ominous because it means no one believes this crash is going to last very long or go very deep enough to turn away the flood of the masses and institutional investors coming into cryptocurrency.
Not sure many people consider this crash a crash. I mean, I do, but I'm seeing too much on the optimism charts to think we'll go anywhere that low again anytime soon.
NB. My doom indicators are also becoming weaker.
I prefer your early-to-late January attitude to this.
Seeing teh horror up close like that.. It can change a man.
February 11, 2018, 05:09:30 PM
Possible slingshot bitcoin crash ahead
Quote
Armstrong is definitely thinking a further crash of everything into a SLINGSHOT move to the upside.
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!
Shelby thinks we're not depressed enough
Armstrong is a shill for the state and Anonymint is just paraphrasing him. If it wasn't obvious already, you only needed to see Armstrong's recent comment telling people they should buy govt run bitcoin futures instead of the actual thing...LOL. Armstrong's last prediction on metals was that gold was going to "$800 or below to the abyss", and it instead went from $1050 to $1350. He's a conman and claims the metals markets aren't even rigged when everyone and their mom knows the ESF naked shorts metals down to cost of production.
It's also NOT POSSIBLE for metals to crash with the rest of the market like in 2008. The only reason the ESF was able to forcibly dump metals during 2008 is because the price of oil (the main cost of production component of metals) went from $140 to $40. There is NO ROOM for oil to landslide deflationary collapse and thus take down metals with them now. The oil industry is already going bankrupt at these prices. CB's don't want them going any lower or having every single shale loan going bust at the same time.
February 11, 2018, 05:09:14 PM
If you want the biggest bubble in history I have one that is bigger.
There wasn't enough volume across the major exchanges. That doesn't count.
February 11, 2018, 05:08:44 PM
===> February 11, 2018, 05:08:26 PM
Possible slingshot bitcoin crash ahead
Quote
Armstrong is definitely thinking a further crash of everything into a SLINGSHOT move to the upside.
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!
Shelby thinks we're not depressed enough
In fact, demeanor is a significant reason I don’t think we’ve bottomed yet. There’s far too much optimism still. A bottom comes when everyone becomes very pessimistic. The fact that the shitcoins are leading Bitcoin is very weird and perhaps very ominous because it means no one believes this crash is going to last very long or go very deep enough to turn away the flood of the masses and institutional investors coming into cryptocurrency.
Not sure many people consider this crash a crash. I mean, I do, but I'm seeing too much on the optimism charts to think we'll go anywhere that low again anytime soon.
NB. My doom indicators are also becoming weaker.
I prefer your early-to-late January attitude to this.
February 11, 2018, 05:04:58 PM
Happened that I'm tired arguing with you about obvious. You stated:
Quote
Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers)
and I've shoved you the figures that in 1944 when the Germans where truly defeated there were 3,370,000 Hitler's fighters confronted to 6,425,000 Soviet fighters. If that complies with your definition of one elephant vs huge number of ants then I'm out of the discussion. You are right that those 3,3M fighters had better technology, were better trained, had superior command infrastructure and still they are defeated by 6.4M fighters. It certainly was not the "ant psychology" that gained victory with such less then 1:2 number difference.Hitler was a retard when it came to military science. His strategies were terrible, and his micromanagement was even worse. If he would've left the war to the generals, most of Eurasia would be speaking German now.
If Hitler had it left to the generals (Heer, not the SS ones), there would have been no war at all.
February 11, 2018, 04:56:50 PM
Happened that I'm tired arguing with you about obvious. You stated:
Quote
Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers)
and I've shoved you the figures that in 1944 when the Germans where truly defeated there were 3,370,000 Hitler's fighters confronted to 6,425,000 Soviet fighters. If that complies with your definition of one elephant vs huge number of ants then I'm out of the discussion. You are right that those 3,3M fighters had better technology, were better trained, had superior command infrastructure and still they are defeated by 6.4M fighters. It certainly was not the "ant psychology" that gained victory with such less then 1:2 number difference.Hitler was a retard when it came to military science. His strategies were terrible, and his micromanagement was even worse. If he would've left the war to the generals, most of Eurasia would be speaking German now.
February 11, 2018, 04:56:32 PM
8185 gonna get broken soon
The neeto thing about using a sockpuppet is the lack of accountability... If you happen to be right you can prance around gloating. But when you are wrong, you can just slink back into the shadows, and fire up the next sock puppet for round 2. Or 3... or 300?
But your screenshot gives us some clues
Running win 7 with a minimalist win95 sort of theme and firefox. Makes you late forties... early 50s. And how's the weather in New Zealand? Because I know it would be pretty damn cold there in that part of Russia that Ms. Palin can see from her back porch.
February 11, 2018, 04:39:40 PM
Oh cool, war talk!
Where's that story about the elephant and the ants? I know some elephants avoid plants that have ants, but they don't bring down the elephants.
I think it was something said during the war. Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers).
Please stop repeating nonsense someone told you before you at least check the facts once. If you bothered to do that, you would find:
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)
Does this look to you like elephant and ants? Something else was the reason why Soviets defeated Hitler, and it's not the number of soldiers.
The ruski numbers are way higher (why does this need pointing out?). So yeah, ants. Also, they were in the r phase of the cultural cycle during the war, so they definitely relied more on numbers than quality. Some of their soldiers were tasked with shooting anyone who fled from the front lines, for fucks sake.
Where's that story about the elephant and the ants? I know some elephants avoid plants that have ants, but they don't bring down the elephants.
I think it was something said during the war. Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers).
Please stop repeating nonsense someone told you before you at least check the facts once. If you bothered to do that, you would find:
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)
Does this look to you like elephant and ants? Something else was the reason why Soviets defeated Hitler, and it's not the number of soldiers.
Repeating nonsense will not make it true. On what do you base your claims these numbers are not true? It's common reaction not tot accept the facts when facts doesn't suite your prejudices and beliefs. Smart people rather question their beliefs then questions the facts. Doubt is good, it's a source of knowledge.
Happened that I'm tired arguing with you about obvious. You stated:
Quote
Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers)
and I've shoved you the figures that in 1944 when the Germans where truly defeated there were 3,370,000 Hitler's fighters confronted to 6,425,000 Soviet fighters. If that complies with your definition of one elephant vs huge number of ants then I'm out of the discussion. You are right that those 3,3M fighters had better technology, were better trained, had superior command infrastructure and still they are defeated by 6.4M fighters. It certainly was not the "ant psychology" that gained victory with such less then 1:2 number difference. February 11, 2018, 04:36:36 PM
Also note, for anyone keeping score, that my 5% cash-out sort of became my trading stash. I got roached out at the bottom. 
February 11, 2018, 04:32:28 PM
Possible slingshot bitcoin crash ahead
Quote
Armstrong is definitely thinking a further crash of everything into a SLINGSHOT move to the upside.
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!
Shelby thinks we're not depressed enough
In fact, demeanor is a significant reason I don’t think we’ve bottomed yet. There’s far too much optimism still. A bottom comes when everyone becomes very pessimistic. The fact that the shitcoins are leading Bitcoin is very weird and perhaps very ominous because it means no one believes this crash is going to last very long or go very deep enough to turn away the flood of the masses and institutional investors coming into cryptocurrency.
Not sure many people consider this crash a crash. I mean, I do, but I'm seeing too much on the optimism charts to think we'll go anywhere that low again anytime soon.
NB. My doom indicators are also becoming weaker.
February 11, 2018, 04:30:13 PM
Oh cool, war talk!
Where's that story about the elephant and the ants? I know some elephants avoid plants that have ants, but they don't bring down the elephants.
I think it was something said during the war. Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers).
Please stop repeating nonsense someone told you before you at least check the facts once. If you bothered to do that, you would find:
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)
Does this look to you like elephant and ants? Something else was the reason why Soviets defeated Hitler, and it's not the number of soldiers.
The ruski numbers are way higher (why does this need pointing out?). So yeah, ants. Also, they were in the r phase of the cultural cycle during the war, so they definitely relied more on numbers than quality. Some of their soldiers were tasked with shooting anyone who fled from the front lines, for fucks sake.
Where's that story about the elephant and the ants? I know some elephants avoid plants that have ants, but they don't bring down the elephants.
I think it was something said during the war. Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers).
Please stop repeating nonsense someone told you before you at least check the facts once. If you bothered to do that, you would find:
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_II)
Does this look to you like elephant and ants? Something else was the reason why Soviets defeated Hitler, and it's not the number of soldiers.
Repeating nonsense will not make it true. On what do you base your claims these numbers are not true? It's common reaction not tot accept the facts when facts doesn't suite your prejudices and beliefs. Smart people rather question their beliefs then questions the facts. Doubt is good, it's a source of knowledge.
Happened that I'm tired arguing with you about obvious. You stated:
Quote
Germany was the elephant (better technology, better trained, better generals, etc.) the Soviets were the ants (huge numbers)
and I've shoved you the figures that in 1944 when the Germans where truly defeated there were 3,370,000 Hitler's fighters confronted to 6,425,000 Soviet fighters. If that complies with your definition of one elephant vs huge number of ants then I'm out of the discussion. You are right that those 3,3M fighters had better technology, were better trained, had superior command infrastructure and still they are defeated by 6.4M fighters. It certainly was not the "ant psychology" that gained victory with such less then 1:2 number difference. February 11, 2018, 04:24:36 PM
Possible slingshot bitcoin crash ahead
Quote
Armstrong is definitely thinking a further crash of everything into a SLINGSHOT move to the upside.
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!
Maybe we should be prepared for a drop to $3500!
Shelby thinks we're not depressed enough
In fact, demeanor is a significant reason I don’t think we’ve bottomed yet. There’s far too much optimism still. A bottom comes when everyone becomes very pessimistic. The fact that the shitcoins are leading Bitcoin is very weird and perhaps very ominous because it means no one believes this crash is going to last very long or go very deep enough to turn away the flood of the masses and institutional investors coming into cryptocurrency.
Jump to: