I want to say something bearish but I cant think of anything at the moment.
The number of disastrously incorrect calls you’ve continuously made should be making you consider keeping your mouth shut for the foreseeable future.
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 15188. (Read 26713795 times)
January 03, 2018, 03:10:38 AM
The number of disastrously incorrect calls you’ve continuously made should be making you consider keeping your mouth shut for the foreseeable future.
January 03, 2018, 02:46:14 AM
Returning from the holiday breaks I see what had some "turbulence" but are on the right track, when can I see a new ath, please? What's the updated weather forecast?
#godblessthehodl
#godblessthehodl
January 03, 2018, 02:44:15 AM
Returning from the holiday breaks I see what had some "turbulence" but are on the right track, when can I see a new ath, please? What's the updated weather forecast?
#godblessthehodl
#godblessthehodl
January 03, 2018, 02:40:41 AM
I want to say something bearish but I cant think of anything at the moment.
When the time is right, you will.
January 03, 2018, 02:40:10 AM
I want to say something bearish but I cant think of anything at the moment.
RSK
smart contracts
January 03, 2018, 02:37:37 AM
I want to say something bearish but I cant think of anything at the moment.
January 03, 2018, 02:35:28 AM
For more about SBTC see the Yobituary.
https://yobit.net/en/trade/SBTC/BTC
Currently trading at 1% of a Bitcoin.
https://yobit.net/en/trade/SBTC/BTC
Currently trading at 1% of a Bitcoin.
January 03, 2018, 02:31:17 AM
The white papers look ok to my untrained eye. Basically, Bitcoin holders do not have to do anything; the RSK protocol will simply be released and available for anyone to use.
The thing I do not fully understand is whether locking in a Bitcoin to the RSK sidechain and taking it out again comes with Bitcoin fees. If that’s the case, the RSK Network would seem similar to a token not connected to the Bitcoin protocol but pegged price-wise to the Bitcoin price on a 1:1 basis.
The proposed ticker SBTC has already been ursurped by Super Bitcoin (SBTC).
For more about RSK see: http://www.rsk.co/
Exciting times.
The thing I do not fully understand is whether locking in a Bitcoin to the RSK sidechain and taking it out again comes with Bitcoin fees. If that’s the case, the RSK Network would seem similar to a token not connected to the Bitcoin protocol but pegged price-wise to the Bitcoin price on a 1:1 basis.
The proposed ticker SBTC has already been ursurped by Super Bitcoin (SBTC).
For more about RSK see: http://www.rsk.co/
Exciting times.
January 03, 2018, 02:28:07 AM
If anyone has any insights into conversion of BTC to sBTC (RSK token) and vice versa please share. The white paper says it will be value pegged but I am not so sure of that.
January 03, 2018, 02:02:47 AM
RSK announcement coming tomorrow. RSK is a sidechain of Bitcoin (convert Bitcoins to RSK tokens and vice versa).
Holy mother of god: 100 tps (scalable to 1,000 tps).
Currently Bitcoin is only about 7tps. This is like Bitcoin getting Segwit 14x.
VERY BULLISH
White paper: https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/ec5278f8-218c-407a-af3c-ab71a910246d/RSK%20White%20Paper%20-%20Overview.pdf
Holy mother of god: 100 tps (scalable to 1,000 tps).
Currently Bitcoin is only about 7tps. This is like Bitcoin getting Segwit 14x.
VERY BULLISH
White paper: https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/ec5278f8-218c-407a-af3c-ab71a910246d/RSK%20White%20Paper%20-%20Overview.pdf
Now this is how to create a bitcoin evolution
January 03, 2018, 01:58:35 AM
Steal might be the wrong word. Let me think of a less emotively charged verb.
Edited:
Edited:
January 03, 2018, 01:55:39 AM
well now
January 03, 2018, 01:52:12 AM
UB's modus operandi is to steal God-mode inactive wallet balances like Satoshi's to fund 'worthy' developments like Ethereum with it. Stealing God-swalloping us is small potatos.
January 03, 2018, 01:50:51 AM
RSK announcement coming tomorrow. RSK is a sidechain of Bitcoin (convert Bitcoins to RSK tokens and vice versa).
Holy mother of god: 100 tps (scalable to 1,000 tps).
Currently Bitcoin is only about 7tps. This is like Bitcoin getting Segwit 14x.
VERY BULLISH
White paper: https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/ec5278f8-218c-407a-af3c-ab71a910246d/RSK%20White%20Paper%20-%20Overview.pdf
Holy mother of god: 100 tps (scalable to 1,000 tps).
Currently Bitcoin is only about 7tps. This is like Bitcoin getting Segwit 14x.
VERY BULLISH
White paper: https://uploads.strikinglycdn.com/files/ec5278f8-218c-407a-af3c-ab71a910246d/RSK%20White%20Paper%20-%20Overview.pdf
January 03, 2018, 01:44:40 AM
So United Bitcoin requires you to have sent a transaction in order to be credited with fork coins. Any address which has not sent coins is counted as “inactive”.
But of course most wallet software sending BTC simply splits the funds into two transactions - the sum being sent and a change transaction to a new address.
Which of course means that your sending address can’t be credited with UB coins because it’s now empty and your change address can’t be credited with coins because it’s “inactive” because it has never sent a transaction.
Which basically means Garzik keeps all the coins but gets to claim a market cap based on a Bitcoin airdrop. Garzik is so clever....
But of course most wallet software sending BTC simply splits the funds into two transactions - the sum being sent and a change transaction to a new address.
Which of course means that your sending address can’t be credited with UB coins because it’s now empty and your change address can’t be credited with coins because it’s “inactive” because it has never sent a transaction.
Which basically means Garzik keeps all the coins but gets to claim a market cap based on a Bitcoin airdrop. Garzik is so clever....
No, I don't think it works like that. They took a snap shot on December the 12th or something like that so even if those addresses have no coins I think they will be credited with how many coins were on them when the snapshot took place. Even if all coins were sent it should still be good.
The UB block explorer is showing my addresses as empty. Maybe the Phase 2 distribution has not been carried out even though Phase 2 is now over.
Mine is too at the moment, so maybe too early. Wait and see I guess, or maybe I was wrong about the process
I suspect phase 2 will need to be sent over the chain to the addresses that satisfy the criteria. They stole all the coins in the first round, so they would need to redistribute these coins in second round.
January 03, 2018, 01:30:53 AM
So United Bitcoin requires you to have sent a transaction in order to be credited with fork coins. Any address which has not sent coins is counted as “inactive”.
But of course most wallet software sending BTC simply splits the funds into two transactions - the sum being sent and a change transaction to a new address.
Which of course means that your sending address can’t be credited with UB coins because it’s now empty and your change address can’t be credited with coins because it’s “inactive” because it has never sent a transaction.
Which basically means Garzik keeps all the coins but gets to claim a market cap based on a Bitcoin airdrop. Garzik is so clever....
But of course most wallet software sending BTC simply splits the funds into two transactions - the sum being sent and a change transaction to a new address.
Which of course means that your sending address can’t be credited with UB coins because it’s now empty and your change address can’t be credited with coins because it’s “inactive” because it has never sent a transaction.
Which basically means Garzik keeps all the coins but gets to claim a market cap based on a Bitcoin airdrop. Garzik is so clever....
No, I don't think it works like that. They took a snap shot on December the 12th or something like that so even if those addresses have no coins I think they will be credited with how many coins were on them when the snapshot took place. Even if all coins were sent it should still be good.
The UB block explorer is showing my addresses as empty. Maybe the Phase 2 distribution has not been carried out even though Phase 2 is now over.
January 03, 2018, 01:21:58 AM
Exter died before he could properly update it. I have PMs too, so I'm not a hater, nor am I a shill for BTC. I also hodl alts. I'm just a hodler for hire.
January 03, 2018, 01:13:00 AM
So United Bitcoin requires you to have sent a transaction in order to be credited with fork coins. Any address which has not sent coins is counted as “inactive”.
But of course most wallet software sending BTC simply splits the funds into two transactions - the sum being sent and a change transaction to a new address.
Which of course means that your sending address can’t be credited with UB coins because it’s now empty and your change address can’t be credited with coins because it’s “inactive” because it has never sent a transaction.
Which basically means Garzik keeps all the coins but gets to claim a market cap based on a Bitcoin airdrop. Garzik is so clever....
But of course most wallet software sending BTC simply splits the funds into two transactions - the sum being sent and a change transaction to a new address.
Which of course means that your sending address can’t be credited with UB coins because it’s now empty and your change address can’t be credited with coins because it’s “inactive” because it has never sent a transaction.
Which basically means Garzik keeps all the coins but gets to claim a market cap based on a Bitcoin airdrop. Garzik is so clever....
Don't worry, in Q1 both Bitcoin Atom and Bitcoin God will be available in your Coinomi wallet. And they are both giving 1:1.
I don't bother with anything less, unless they for some reason should take of.
January 03, 2018, 01:09:07 AM
So United Bitcoin requires you to have sent a transaction in order to be credited with fork coins. Any address which has not sent coins is counted as “inactive”.
But of course most wallet software sending BTC simply splits the funds into two transactions - the sum being sent and a change transaction to a new address.
Which of course means that your sending address can’t be credited with UB coins because it’s now empty and your change address can’t be credited with coins because it’s “inactive” because it has never sent a transaction.
Which basically means Garzik keeps all the coins but gets to claim a market cap based on a Bitcoin airdrop. Garzik is so clever....
But of course most wallet software sending BTC simply splits the funds into two transactions - the sum being sent and a change transaction to a new address.
Which of course means that your sending address can’t be credited with UB coins because it’s now empty and your change address can’t be credited with coins because it’s “inactive” because it has never sent a transaction.
Which basically means Garzik keeps all the coins but gets to claim a market cap based on a Bitcoin airdrop. Garzik is so clever....
No, I don't think it works like that. They took a snap shot on December the 12th or something like that so even if those addresses have no coins I think they will be credited with how many coins were on them when the snapshot took place. Even if all coins were sent it should still be good.
January 03, 2018, 12:59:48 AM
So United Bitcoin requires you to have sent a transaction in order to be credited with fork coins. Any address which has not sent coins is counted as “inactive”.
But of course most wallet software sending BTC simply splits the funds into two transactions - the sum being sent and a change transaction to a new address.
Which of course means that your sending address can’t be credited with UB coins because it’s now empty and your change address can’t be credited with coins because it’s “inactive” because it has never sent a transaction.
Which basically means Garzik keeps all the coins but gets to claim a market cap based on a Bitcoin airdrop. Garzik is so clever....
But of course most wallet software sending BTC simply splits the funds into two transactions - the sum being sent and a change transaction to a new address.
Which of course means that your sending address can’t be credited with UB coins because it’s now empty and your change address can’t be credited with coins because it’s “inactive” because it has never sent a transaction.
Which basically means Garzik keeps all the coins but gets to claim a market cap based on a Bitcoin airdrop. Garzik is so clever....
Jump to: