Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 16057. (Read 26720782 times)

legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot
list of live right redacted

addendum, keep the intoxicants to a dull roar
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
tonnes of scope for Ver to scam people for the wrong bitcoin

There isn't a right bitcoin because nobody ever solved the problems of decentralization or scaling.  Not to mention decentralization is a problem that's not possible to solve in craptocurrency, rendering the entire exercise pointless and inferior to gold and silver as money which already existed beforehand.

The only way bitcoin could theoretically derive some type of value is from transaction flow and not stock, since it's mostly an imaginary idea/thing in the first place.  You can't store value in an imaginary asset.  It's value could only come from whatever possible utility it provides.  It doesn't have value just from existing (stock)...because it doesn't really even exist.  Gold and silver have actual scarcity.  Bitcoin is based on artificial scarcity.  This makes it similar to fiat from an economics point of view, in that any value over zero is technically a bubble, it's only a question of how long the bubble lasts.  But the market will eventually take the value back down to zero again.  It could come quick and painful like Venezeulan fiat, or longer and drawn out like USD fiat.

So, without trying to take sides on any dumb tertiary issues that I dont' care about between people like Roger Ver, Maxwell, and the Gavinator, the fact is that bitcoin is not decentralized and never will be decentralized, so whether your blocks are big or small doesn't really matter all too much.  From the economics point of view, the bitcoin value should be HIGHLY correlated to scaling (flow) and zero to do with stock because it's a fucking imaginary asset.  So if your goal is just to try and increase the value of your pump and dump (let's face it, that's all bitcoin is because without solving the problem of decentralization, it has zero fundamentals and it's not possible to solve), then you would want to raise scaling at all costs in an attempt to inflate the pump and dump before it inevitably impoldes and people park their money in non-imaginary assets instead.


I remember a time when Roach was posting meme's about his trading profits. I saw a happy Roach in that time.

Roach is not so happy these days, he loves shitting on Bitcoin...i know why!

Roach sold at the bottom Kiss

No, it's amusing to see the price of bitcoin rise when it's just some fringe thing, but not once you can see the endgame getting closer:  a federated digital only slave currency run by jewish money changers.  Fox just the other day was trying to float the idea of social security being issued by "blockchain", so you'd have your identity tied to the thing and they dole you out your stipend that way.  It's pretty fucking obvious they would also expand that to the entire monetary system and then you'd have your digital slave currency they've always wanted to implement where everyone would be forced to transact under the "social security blockchain".

Where does that leave bitcoin?  Bitcoin is almost entirely centralized so they can just attack the giant PoW farms or outlaw it and it's gone instantly and then they force everyone onto govt chain.  Anyone that values freedom should be boycotting anything remotely connected to digital currency at all.  Since it's not possible to solve decentralization, the only possible evolution of craptocurrency WILL BE federated chains run by govt and/or corporations.  Anything related to "blockchain" will be detrimental to humans in general while the only way to defeat the jewish money changers and their debt based slave systems is using physical gold and silver in native coin form.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 361
I would like to clarify my position regarding Mark Karpeles lest my last post be taken out of context.  While he does look eminently  punchable on that particular pic, I actually bear him no ill will.  It is my belief that Mark was simply in over his head, that when he got robbed he tried to find a workaround with the willy bot but events caught up with him.

My personal story is that I was able to get the lion's share of my modest holdings off of GOX without issue well after the alarm bells were sounding.  I believe that he set some sort of algorithm or threshold that locked large accounts near the end, while allowing smaller fish to escape, and for this noble act I applaud him.

I still think he was a dumbass who was in over his head, but I do not believe he ever meant to harm anyone.

I don't think any us took it as serious, but good on you for clarifying.

While we are on the topic of Mark - congrats to him for his amazing transformation.

If any of you reading this are out of shape - go and get your self sorted out - it's not hard.
-Diet
-Exercise
-Dress well
-Be excellent to other people, especially family
-Read
(I'm assuming you are already financially secure or will be soon)

No point being rich and in an early grave, lonely or hated.


sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 254
tonnes of scope for Ver to scam people for the wrong bitcoin

but...


I remember a time when Roach was posting meme's about his trading profits. I saw a happy Roach in that time.

Roach is not so happy these days, he loves shitting on Bitcoin...i know why!

Roach sold at the bottom Kiss

Is that why it's called 'being Roached' out of the market? No wonder he's so bitter. Cry
legendary
Activity: 3620
Merit: 4813
tonnes of scope for Ver to scam people for the wrong bitcoin

There isn't a right bitcoin because nobody ever solved the problems of decentralization or scaling.  Not to mention decentralization is a problem that's not possible to solve in craptocurrency, rendering the entire exercise pointless and inferior to gold and silver as money which already existed beforehand.

The only way bitcoin could theoretically derive some type of value is from transaction flow and not stock, since it's mostly an imaginary idea/thing in the first place.  You can't store value in an imaginary asset.  It's value could only come from whatever possible utility it provides.  It doesn't have value just from existing (stock)...because it doesn't really even exist.  Gold and silver have actual scarcity.  Bitcoin is based on artificial scarcity.  This makes it similar to fiat from an economics point of view, in that any value over zero is technically a bubble, it's only a question of how long the bubble lasts.  But the market will eventually take the value back down to zero again.  It could come quick and painful like Venezeulan fiat, or longer and drawn out like USD fiat.

So, without trying to take sides on any dumb tertiary issues that I dont' care about between people like Roger Ver, Maxwell, and the Gavinator, the fact is that bitcoin is not decentralized and never will be decentralized, so whether your blocks are big or small doesn't really matter all too much.  From the economics point of view, the bitcoin value should be HIGHLY correlated to scaling (flow) and zero to do with stock because it's a fucking imaginary asset.  So if your goal is just to try and increase the value of your pump and dump (let's face it, that's all bitcoin is because without solving the problem of decentralization, it has zero fundamentals and it's not possible to solve), then you would want to raise scaling at all costs in an attempt to inflate the pump and dump before it inevitably impoldes and people park their money in non-imaginary assets instead.


I remember a time when Roach was posting meme's about his trading profits. I saw a happy Roach in that time.

Roach is not so happy these days, he loves shitting on Bitcoin...i know why!

Roach sold at the bottom Kiss
sr. member
Activity: 924
Merit: 311
#TheGoyimKnow
tonnes of scope for Ver to scam people for the wrong bitcoin

There isn't a right bitcoin because nobody ever solved the problems of decentralization or scaling.  Not to mention decentralization is a problem that's not possible to solve in craptocurrency, rendering the entire exercise pointless and inferior to gold and silver as money which already existed beforehand.

The only way bitcoin could theoretically derive some type of value is from transaction flow and not stock, since it's mostly an imaginary idea/thing in the first place.  You can't store value in an imaginary asset.  It's value could only come from whatever possible utility it provides.  It doesn't have value just from existing (stock)...because it doesn't really even exist.  Gold and silver have actual scarcity.  Bitcoin is based on artificial scarcity.  This makes it similar to fiat from an economics point of view, in that any value over zero is technically a bubble, it's only a question of how long the bubble lasts.  But the market will eventually take the value back down to zero again.  It could come quick and painful like Venezeulan fiat, or longer and drawn out like USD fiat.

So, without trying to take sides on any dumb tertiary issues that I dont' care about between people like Roger Ver, Maxwell, and the Gavinator, the fact is that bitcoin is not decentralized and never will be decentralized, so whether your blocks are big or small doesn't really matter all too much.  From the economics point of view, the bitcoin value should be HIGHLY correlated to scaling (flow) and zero to do with stock because it's a fucking imaginary asset.  So if your goal is just to try and increase the value of your pump and dump (let's face it, that's all bitcoin is because without solving the problem of decentralization, it has zero fundamentals and it's not possible to solve), then you would want to raise scaling at all costs in an attempt to inflate the pump and dump before it inevitably impoldes and people park their money in non-imaginary assets instead.
hero member
Activity: 1848
Merit: 640
*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*
See, the altcoin pumpers are some of the stupidest people on earth.

They pump them all. Literally ALL OF THEM at the same time.

Then their troll army spams the Bitcoin forums with "This [ONE altcoin X] is going to take over Bitcoin!"

Yeah, that's real convincing work there.  They must all be special unicorns. If only we knew which one. /s Roll Eyes

true however "onecoin" takes it to a whole new plateau Cool bwhaha
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot
I would like to clarify my position regarding Mark Karpeles lest my last post be taken out of context.  While he does look eminently punchable in that particular pic, I actually bear him no ill will.  It is my belief that Mark was simply in over his head, that when he got robbed he tried to find a workaround with the willy bot but events caught up with him.

My personal story is that I was able to get the lion's share of my modest holdings off of GOX without issue well after the alarm bells were sounding.  I believe that he set some sort of algorithm or threshold that locked large accounts near the end, while allowing smaller fish to escape, and for this noble act I applaud him.

I still think he was a dumbass who was in over his head, but I do not believe he ever meant to harm anyone.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 361
Nice little pump underway.

The order book on stamp looks a little unbalanced - there is a sudden drop off of coins above $8k

legendary
Activity: 3794
Merit: 5474
See, the altcoin pumpers are some of the stupidest people on earth.

They pump them all. Literally ALL OF THEM at the same time.

Then their troll army spams the Bitcoin forums with "This [ONE altcoin X] is going to take over Bitcoin!"

Yeah, that's real convincing work there.  They must all be special unicorns. If only we knew which one. /s Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot
God damn, ol' magical tux looking pretty trim and smug there.

Whatever he's doing it agrees with him, hasn't looked so good in years...punchable...but good.
legendary
Activity: 3808
Merit: 7912
Although I never frequent reddit, I see shades of that here too.

HAHA ! Suck my dick, idiot !

Good luck !

DIE BitCH DIE !!!!

Just lost a mouthful of coke zero!
Lol
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 4839
Addicted to HoDLing!
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 254
I guess nobody reads the last sentence anymore. Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

looking at the 4 hour optamisum chart we should  hit $7400 in a few hours  Smiley

Jesus Christ, this guy and his magic 4 hour optamisum chart.


MOTHERFUCKING BUY BUY BUY!!!


Are we on our way? 


Must we bow to the deity?


 Cheesy Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 354
Merit: 250
Bitstamp is pumping again  Grin Grin
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 254
WSJ article is paywalled. Here's an imgur image.



That last sentence is about as bearish as fk.
legendary
Activity: 2101
Merit: 1061
As someone who bought their first Bitcoin in 2012 for $20,

Indeed, I can't help but laugh at all the thousands of newcomers who just read r/bitcoin and suddenly think they are scaling experts. That Bitcoin should be able to run a node on every Raspberry Pi in Afghanistan. Yada yada yada. This is psychologically manipulated groupthink. Let's face it - many of the people getting into Bitcoin today are "newbies" who weren't very smart or educated in the first place. But they all like to act like they are, ESPECIALLY when it comes to their opinions on the Blocksize debate - an opinion that was only formed through reddit. Oh boy do they love repeating those opinions, and screaming down anyone who disagrees, like a bunch of drunken fratboys who think they are about to lose their virginity. Only a very small minority are capable of using logic or reason.

It's both amusing and kind of sickening to watch happen.

Anyway, now that the dust has settled and the "1mb forever" crowd has won, Legacy Bitcoin will likely never scale in any meaningful kind of way - Meaning Legacy BTC will never be anything more than a speculator's toy to get rich, a gateway to altcoins and FIAT and a settlement layer.

However, I still fully expect the combined speculator and institutional investor money to take Legacy Bitcoin to 50 - 100K and beyond. However, it will become impossible to move coin at some point on the main chain , with $100+ fees, making a very large percentage of BTC wallets unspendable. At that point, the vast majority of Crypto users and commerce will have already moved to either Bitcoin Cash, Monero or Ethereum. In the long long run, 5+ years, I fully expect either Bitcoin Cash, Monero or Ethereum to become the #1 coin with the highest market cap. It's inevitable now that Bitcoin will never scale - and let's be honest, Lightning Network will either never exist or will never deliver as promised --- which means BTC is going to be stuck where it is now from the scaling perspective, with only a few band-aids thrown on top, likely forever -- unless the miners finally grow a pair, say enough is enough and stand up to the bought out Corporate shills at Blockstream, but I'm not holding out hope for that outcome at all.


I've also been around a long time and agree with your sentiments. The behavior on reddit is terrible - I can only assume they are just young and stupid? I try my best not to assume malice or conspiracy...

Maybe it's time we set up a real Rosewater Foundation where the elders can train a few of these future millionaires on the ways of being a virtuous person.

Exhibit A:




Although I never frequent reddit, I see shades of that here too.

 
hero member
Activity: 605
Merit: 634
WSJ article is paywalled. Here's an imgur image.

Jump to: