Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 16133. (Read 26732153 times)

legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile
Based on the evidence that I have right now, it seems that they were engaged in pretty evil conduct... but maybe I am missing a few details, and I doubt it is really worth a battle to go down this path, right?

we get to trust the math but not necessarily the various people?  


mathematically someone evil and hidden is trying to destroy bitcoin - this is true and correct

bitcoin is mathematical trust and transparent - this is true and correct

mathematically then to change the trust and transparency you expose the evil intentions against bitcoin

but not the person funding it, only the players being funded can do that

1. If they do know they wont 2. If they realize they being duped, they may be too scared


I think that we are on the same page here, mymenace...   Some posters here, seem to think that you just accept that these fucking attackers have been acting in good faith in order to "improve" bitcoin, which should be obvious, for the most part, that they are not acting in good faith because otherwise they would work within the system to make robust proposals and to argue them to death and provide evidence and attempt to garner support through those kinds of means, rather than engaging in what seems fairly obvious as destructive measures and lucky for us, there is a smart enough community of bitcoinners that recognize the bullshit of the attackers and a large number of strong (and seemingly smart) core developers to also develop robust code and strategies that protect capital punishment type death to bitcoin, which kind of seems to make bitcoin stronger - lucky for us BTC HODLers and accumulators.

right on

the amount of crap thrown at bitcoin over the last 12 months is phenomenal

yet the next week price goes boom again

luvin it


side note: if they have no answer, purposely refuse not to see their point of view, if then they become abusive or violent - you found a piece in the puzzle to all thats #happening at #aliceinwonderland just follow the #breadcrumbs +++



legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1130
Hilarious.

I think that was the BCH Launch  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 361
Are we ready for takeoff??

Everyone is onboard the Bitcoin plane! The pilot taxis to the very end of the runway, turns the plan around on a dime, adjusts his sunglasses and throttles up the engines.

It's a heavy load, the tanks are full of fuel - the cargo bay is full of champagne, gold bars and lambos - we will need every inch of the runway. Fasten your seat belts - we are going up goddammit!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZGXwbPfwQs

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
Just think of all the Idiots, who traded that shit on Hitbtc...
That Butt must hurt...

Why is this thing still being traded at 350 USD? Makes no sense? Who the fuck is buying?

rogue miners can still run the software, it could still happen

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/928308564208373761
Quote from: PeterTodd
_Not_ a guarantee that 2X won't happen - Belshe can't stop miners from running that software - but it's much less likely.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 502
waiting to explode
Just think of all the Idiots, who traded that shit on Hitbtc...
That Butt must hurt...

Why is this thing still being traded at 350 USD? Makes no sense? Who the fuck is buying?
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Based on the evidence that I have right now, it seems that they were engaged in pretty evil conduct... but maybe I am missing a few details, and I doubt it is really worth a battle to go down this path, right?

we get to trust the math but not necessarily the various people?  


mathematically someone evil and hidden is trying to destroy bitcoin - this is true and correct

bitcoin is mathematical trust and transparent - this is true and correct

mathematically then to change the trust and transparency you expose the evil intentions against bitcoin

but not the person funding it, only the players being funded can do that

1. If they do know they wont 2. If they realize they being duped, they may be too scared


I think that we are on the same page here, mymenace...   Some posters here, seem to think that you just accept that these fucking attackers have been acting in good faith in order to "improve" bitcoin, which should be obvious, for the most part, that they are not acting in good faith because otherwise they would work within the system to make robust proposals and to argue them to death and provide evidence and attempt to garner support through those kinds of means, rather than engaging in what seems fairly obvious as destructive measures and lucky for us, there is a smart enough community of bitcoinners that recognize the bullshit of the attackers and a large number of strong (and seemingly smart) core developers to also develop robust code and strategies that protect capital punishment type death to bitcoin, which kind of seems to make bitcoin stronger - lucky for us BTC HODLers and accumulators.
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
[edited out]

........Really, fuckface* ......

* stated in the most loving manner. Well, the most deserving of someone who randomly asserts false crap about me. Fuckface.

Hahahahaha.. you said it twice, and I really have some difficulties understanding how "fuckface" deserves a descriptive footnote, and at the end of the descriptive footnote, it is either signed by you as "fuckface" or you just cannot help to repeat "lovingly" calling it to Paashaas one more time?

I thought that I was using "fuck" a lot, but fuckface does not even seem to fit very well into any kind of descriptive context, even if used in a "most loving manner"   Tongue

Rather disingenuous for you to quote the invective, while not quoting the substance. One portion thereof to wit:

Quote
'Copy pasting'? I challenge you to find a handful of sentences I have copy pasted. Really, fuckface* - find the evidence and post it.

...which, of course, in response to an accusation by Paashass that I merely copy-paste my replies. In other words, a false assertion on his/her part, for which I am fully entitled to refute directly.

The careful reader will note that no such evidence has been proffered to support the specious accusation.


O.k.. thou dost protest too muchie.

How could I be disingenuous when I am not even talking substantively about the argument between you and paashaas, whether he actually merits the "fuckface" descriptor or not, and I was just having a little fun with you in regards to your choice of fuckface rather than some other kind of potentially better discriptor.  You disgruntled fat picnic food eating bear, you.

Have a little fun!!!!  I understand that your grumpy ass bear is likely feeling worse because your potentially newly spouted attack vector (namely segwit2x) has seemingly been put on a kind of tentative HODL status.. and even cancelled completely - yet I doubt that either you or your other nutjobber BIG blockers are going to give up on your whining about core, blah blah blah.. but I do recognize that it probably has not been a good day for you hoo.  So, to the extent that there is any genuiness in your BIG blocker nutjob position, which I highly doubt, I would therefore hypothetically have some sympathy to the extent that possibly, maybe and perhaps there could on the out chance be some actual kind of semblance of genuineness there.... so DONT  Angry be using my "genuiness" word against me, especially when it doesn't even seem to apply to this particular situation. Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061
Smile
Based on the evidence that I have right now, it seems that they were engaged in pretty evil conduct... but maybe I am missing a few details, and I doubt it is really worth a battle to go down this path, right?

we get to trust the math but not necessarily the various people?  


mathematically someone evil and hidden is trying to destroy bitcoin - this is true and correct

bitcoin is mathematical trust and transparent - this is true and correct

mathematically then to change the trust and transparency you expose the evil intentions against bitcoin

but not the person funding it, only the players being funded can do that

1. If they do know they wont 2. If they realize they being duped, they may be too scared

hero member
Activity: 894
Merit: 501
nice wee ascending triangle there
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 5565
Note the unconventional cAPITALIZATION!
TALKY MAN TALK TOO MUCH
Even though I have him on ignore I can still kind of hear the chatter from a distance.
Vin
legendary
Activity: 1166
Merit: 1015


Great one.

When does ist starts?  Tongue
legendary
Activity: 3080
Merit: 1688
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
[edited out]

........Really, fuckface* ......

* stated in the most loving manner. Well, the most deserving of someone who randomly asserts false crap about me. Fuckface.

Hahahahaha.. you said it twice, and I really have some difficulties understanding how "fuckface" deserves a descriptive footnote, and at the end of the descriptive footnote, it is either signed by you as "fuckface" or you just cannot help to repeat "lovingly" calling it to Paashaas one more time?

I thought that I was using "fuck" a lot, but fuckface does not even seem to fit very well into any kind of descriptive context, even if used in a "most loving manner"   Tongue

Rather disingenuous for you to quote the invective, while not quoting the substance. One portion thereof to wit:

Quote
'Copy pasting'? I challenge you to find a handful of sentences I have copy pasted. Really, fuckface* - find the evidence and post it.

...which, of course, in response to an accusation by Paashass that I merely copy-paste my replies. In other words, a false assertion on his/her part, for which I am fully entitled to refute directly.

The careful reader will note that no such evidence has been proffered to support the specious accusation.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 254
Now it has settled and we are back to where we started before all the 2x getting cancelled news.

Can we finally get back to getting to $8k already? Huh

Someone is still buying futures, the miners are still signalling. Seems premature..


the futures have gone from $186 to $220 while we've dropped. does this mean nothing?


Yeah, futures are now $340. Still no idea what's going on.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Actually that Quantum Computing article against Bitcoin can't even get its fact straight.  "Most mining is done by application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) made by companies such as Nvidia". 

Nvidia doesn't even have fabs and they miss the timeline by 5 years if they think that mining is still being done by GPUs.  It would be more correct to say that both Bitmain and Nvidia uses TSMC's foundry services (and so are most of FPGA/CPLD made back when it was still profitable to mine with them, before ASIC came along). 

Lastly, my condolence to the "SegWit by Miner Activated Soft-Fork with a 2MB Blocksize Increase DCG Consensus Agreement of 2017" dude who died in vain.  The S2X cabal now has innocent blood on their hand.


legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828

They don't need to run btc1. It's just a simple patch to core code.

They don't need to keep signaling anymore. If they keep doing it, it needs to be interpreted as their intention to follow on with the agreement. In this case with the 2x part of it.

It's not because they "signaled" it... it is because the keep signaling it now.

What other interpretation would be possible for their signaling now?



Trying to play chicken with the Core team to get them to agree to Segwit2x agreement even if no one from the Core team was there to be party to the agreement. I think the big blockers will be the ones to pull off to the side come early November.


So glad that I was right. Big blockers pulled away.  Cool
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 254
Now it has settled and we are back to where we started before all the 2x getting cancelled news.

Can we finally get back to getting to $8k already? Huh

Someone is still buying futures, the miners are still signalling. Seems premature..


the futures have gone from $186 to $220 while we've dropped. does this mean nothing?
legendary
Activity: 1806
Merit: 1828
Now it has settled and we are back to where we started before all the 2x getting cancelled news.

Can we finally get back to getting to $8k already? Huh

Someone is still buying futures, the miners are still signalling. Seems premature..
legendary
Activity: 3962
Merit: 11519
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Jump to: