Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 16208. (Read 26725292 times)

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
Spoken like a true r.

You buy this stuff, Bob? Should I look into it? What _does_ the scientific community have to say about it? I haven't done much reading lately.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
I have 34 of those that I bought back in 2014 or something. Might have to go thru the effort of selling them

Better to keep them while we keep forking a few more years.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
BTG could have had "some potential" had they not been so secret about it and didn't premine it. That alone makes it a non-starter.

BCH is a non-starter, didn't stop anybody from hucking money at it.

BCH didn't have a premine and was better organized...

Well whoever has that premine should be hucking money at it.  Angry

I'll wait.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
BTG could have had "some potential" had they not been so secret about it and didn't premine it. That alone makes it a non-starter.

BCH is a non-starter, didn't stop anybody from hucking money at it.

BCH didn't have a premine and was better organized...
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
BTG could have had "some potential" had they not been so secret about it and didn't premine it. That alone makes it a non-starter.

BCH is a non-starter, didn't stop anybody from hucking money at it.
legendary
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
BTG could have had "some potential" had they not been so secret about it and didn't premine it. That alone makes it a non-starter.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
On a totally unrelated note, alt gold is down to 1% and I haven't even seen any yet. Not the candied apple windfall some of us had hoped for. Embarrassed
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
^If you really want to bash your head against the wall, you might want to jump right into the Flat Earth thread. But I should warn you...
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 254
There is no reason to think that genetic differences within the human species can significantly affect reproductive strategy or political belief.

There's that lack of introspection I was referring to...

Your daily reading:

A surprising turn of events comes your way, but it could be just what the doctor ordered. You could sulk and pout and complain that this isn't what you expected -- and refuse to deal with the situation. On the other hand, you could acknowledge the disappointment, make the best of what you've got and then end up enjoying the recent circumstances, which could turn out to be quite beneficial.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
(nonsense)

Ignored.
But it's interesting how Vertcoin is pumping lately. It must be a coincidence. It can't be related to the ASICs politics b/s in BTC.



I have 34 of those that I bought back in 2014 or something. Might have to go thru the effort of selling them
hero member
Activity: 1876
Merit: 612
Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
(nonsense)

Ignored.
But it's interesting how Vertcoin is pumping lately. It must be a coincidence. It can't be related to the ASICs politics b/s in BTC.

hero member
Activity: 1848
Merit: 640
*Brute force will solve any Bitcoin problem*
Quote
*Unless a change in POW helps to equalize mining power by making costs harder to scale.
...Your apparent belief that a change in PoW will make any difference in centralization is unpersuasive. No matter the technology, mining power will coalesce to those that possess the financial resources, the BizOps acumen, and most importantly the persistence and pain tolerance needed for entrepreneurship on a grand scale.

I don't believe this is true. If somehow PoW can be tied to a smartphone for "one phone one vote", those who have financial resources can screw themselves against the brute force of several billion smartphone users.

Just No. Those that have the resources will run hundreds of android emulator VMs on each of hundreds of servers, and we'll be right back with the same centralization problem we have today.
We won't, if we switch to to a RAM and RAM-access intensive PoW algo. Let them try to emulate terabytes of RAM in a time efficient way. No eh? Just as I thought.

there is some really ASIC-resistant PoW, used by Vertcoin and maybe others. If the PoW has to be changed I'd like that to bring back the VGAs.

china asics are a serious threat to democracy and mr robot knows this Wink lol

legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 2053
Free spirit
Quote
*Unless a change in POW helps to equalize mining power by making costs harder to scale.
...Your apparent belief that a change in PoW will make any difference in centralization is unpersuasive. No matter the technology, mining power will coalesce to those that possess the financial resources, the BizOps acumen, and most importantly the persistence and pain tolerance needed for entrepreneurship on a grand scale.

I don't believe this is true. If somehow PoW can be tied to a smartphone for "one phone one vote", those who have financial resources can screw themselves against the brute force of several billion smartphone users.

Just No. Those that have the resources will run hundreds of android emulator VMs on each of hundreds of servers, and we'll be right back with the same centralization problem we have today.
We won't, if we switch to to a RAM and RAM-access intensive PoW algo. Let them try to emulate terabytes of RAM in a time efficient way. No eh? Just as I thought.

there is some really ASIC-resistant PoW, used by Vertcoin and maybe others. If the PoW has to be changed I'd like that to bring back the VGAs.

Or ideally a regular change (2 yr?) is baked in so its a regular reset.

How about that? limit the return for custom hardware
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
Quote
*Unless a change in POW helps to equalize mining power by making costs harder to scale.
...Your apparent belief that a change in PoW will make any difference in centralization is unpersuasive. No matter the technology, mining power will coalesce to those that possess the financial resources, the BizOps acumen, and most importantly the persistence and pain tolerance needed for entrepreneurship on a grand scale.

I don't believe this is true. If somehow PoW can be tied to a smartphone for "one phone one vote", those who have financial resources can screw themselves against the brute force of several billion smartphone users.

Just No. Those that have the resources will run hundreds of android emulator VMs on each of hundreds of servers, and we'll be right back with the same centralization problem we have today.
We won't, if we switch to to a RAM and RAM-access intensive PoW algo. Let them try to emulate terabytes of RAM in a time efficient way. No eh? Just as I thought.

there is some really ASIC-resistant PoW, used by Vertcoin and maybe others. If the PoW has to be changed I'd like that to bring back the VGAs.
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3038
Quote
*Unless a change in POW helps to equalize mining power by making costs harder to scale.
...Your apparent belief that a change in PoW will make any difference in centralization is unpersuasive. No matter the technology, mining power will coalesce to those that possess the financial resources, the BizOps acumen, and most importantly the persistence and pain tolerance needed for entrepreneurship on a grand scale.

I don't believe this is true. If somehow PoW can be tied to a smartphone for "one phone one vote", those who have financial resources can screw themselves against the brute force of several billion smartphone users.

Just No. Those that have the resources will run hundreds of android emulator VMs on each of hundreds of servers, and we'll be right back with the same centralization problem we have today.
We won't, if we switch to to a RAM and RAM-access intensive PoW algo. Let them try to emulate terabytes of RAM in a time efficient way. No eh? Just as I thought.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
Would you like to list some, er... non-pseudo objections, shall we say? Or is it enough for you to throw around ad homs?

legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Every single person I've come across using r/K selection theory to describe human affairs has been defining themselves as a "K".

Then every single person that has likely labeled themselves as K is being dishonest with themselves and have not exercised introspection.

I agree with the general premise that most apex organisms will transition from an r to K (or even to Super K in rare cases).

It's possible to vacillate between r and K states throughout a lifetime.

I myself, can introspectively see my own development from r to K, back to r, then to K again, to (possibly) a Super K ? (supporting/leading a larger familial genetic pool/community, at the expense of failing to pass on my own genetics...)

Speaking to your point, however, I do believe that, ultimately, most apex organisms do aspire towards K status, but perhaps view themselves that way through a warped lense or lack of cognition.

And yes, I can see how some could argue this post is ironic and filled with flawed-logic.

Debate.

The pseudo-science claptrap du jour. Why bother Huh
Once again, nothing pseudo about it. Just science.

Would you like to list some, er... non-pseudo objections, shall we say? Or is it enough for you to throw around ad homs?
legendary
Activity: 1891
Merit: 3096
All good things to those who wait
Everytime AltCash pumps follows a dump on Bitcoin. Hmm... JihaD Wu and his moron puppet R. Ver are delusional if they think users will follow their scam. Cool
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 4839
Addicted to HoDLing!
There we go again... [5-minute candles, values are in EUR]

Jump to: