This is a great example (even though it is sad and a bit depressing, too).
Historically, I have tended to lecture forum members about any kind of overly dependence on merely earning bitcoin rather than buying bitcoin.. because sometimes there can be ways to earn money (including fiat) that is going to allow you to buy way more bitcoin than you are able to from earning, whether we are referring to a signature campaign or other ways that you might be able to get paid for providing goods, services and/or labor...
Accumulating Bitcoin with slow pace is better then no accumulation at all. There are ways to get Bitcoin like p2p trading in Binance but the issue is you need to perform KYC with Binance and that expose you. So its better not to get exposed by such platforms.
You are right that I must look to buy Bitcoins from members here but for that I need to figure out how to settle transaction.
You cant say when one will make it to 1
BTC, no one can predict future price of Bitcoin.
I am surely not trying to disrespect any of your own personal discretion because each of us have to figure out the various kinds of balances that we are going to make, including the various ways in which we either get bitcoin exposure and/or the various ways that we might be able to hold our bitcoin in private ways and even categorize the various kinds of bitcoin stash that we have.
I am not even saying that any of these balances are easy, yet I still become somewhat uncomfortable when historically some people engaged in such whimpy bitcoin accumulation strategies and they had financial means in which they could have easily UPped their bitcoin accumulation game without even putting themselves at very much risk.. besides having to have some KYC bitcoin and also perhaps some temporary exchange (third party) risk depending on how much you might choose to keep on the various exchanges or if they may or may not allow for being able to withdraw the BTC.
I surely suggest NOT letting the perfect become the enemy of the good in terms of potentially unduly limiting your own BTC accumulations more than maybe your future self might have preferred you to do...and at the same time, you are totally in charge (and responsible) for your own ways of balancing these kinds of matters...
and I also realize that sometimes people will handicap themselves on purpose because they do not actually believe in bitcoin as much as they might claim to do.. (and there is nothing wrong with that). We surely have had some people who had regretted their earlier whimpier approach to BTC accumulation, and then they realize later in life (after the BTC price is 10x or 20x or some other multitudes/magnitudes higher that they need to become more aggressive in their BTC accumulation.. and again there is nothing wrong with any of that because each of us "get bitcoin" within our own timing .. which may well end up being at a higher price than our earlier times in bitcoin.
[...]
and for 1 Transaction it uses as much electricity as VW Factory uses in a day for its production..
You really don't know how bitcoin works.. and more likely you know, but you are just spouting out nonsense talking points from your handlers.[...]
Don't bet that s/he/it knows... This is a tough subject, you know... Most people don't quite get it, and I don't believe eXPCrap is the sharpest tool in the box.
That's true...
I had to LOL at this one..
[edited out]
If it moons from 5 to 32
he would sell around 10
all the rest would essentially be free.
And once he pays taxes on the 10 dropping back to 6. He has 6 cash to wait for a buy the dip move.
I doubt that Saylor thinks like that. You can listen to him and hear that he does not think like that.
In other words, there are no reasons to take profits in dollars.. or to trade or to get your investment capital back in order to lower your basis from $30k to zero.... if that is how you are thinking about it. No need to engage in that kind of selling currently or even if the BTC price goes up from here to $200k. . which results in Saylor's/MSTR's stash going from $5billion to $32billion.
You heard of the concept of letting your winners ride, haven't you? Saylor seems to be a "let your winners ride" kind of a guy... and he can spend bitcoin as business expenses and remember he has his own BTC stash around 17k BTC or so.. maybe he has more, but geez, he is not even close to desperate in terms of places upon which he could draw some value, if he felt that he needed to buy another yacht or whatever.
Sure, he can do whatever the fuck he wants and even change is mind and/or his practices, but I see no reason to lock him into some kind of a box (or to make a prediction about what he is going to do that is surely discretionary and is not even the "best" thing to do, if we can even consider what might be "the best" thing to do).
lets hope you are right. he lets it ride at 200k a coin in 2025. or late 2024