Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 16599. (Read 26610030 times)

legendary
Activity: 2242
Merit: 3523
Flippin' burgers since 1163.
[...] I predict a lot of resistance at $6666.

Had a bit of a déjà vu:
Is it my imagination or does Bitcoin tend to gravitate towards $666

Someone is a big believer in the bible and the reference to 666.

They are pushing their belief in Christianity through a Bitcoin price trying to link Bitcoin and Christianity.

Some huge religious fanatic with a lot of bitcoins is really going out of their way to spread God's word.

Wonder if Luke has any coins left.
legendary
Activity: 3920
Merit: 11299
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

it's called trolling, and shows a bit of click-bait desperation to attempt some kind of non-topical discussion - NOT that this thread has any meaningful ability to stay on topic... but this three links click bait goes a bit over board in the "off-topicness" arena... hahahahaha... but can be kind of funny because you can see a kind of desperation ... let't talk about this, or this, or this or this... in order to not talk about the great things going on in bitcoin right now, including the fact that we seem to be in the midst (or possibly the beginning stages) of an s-curve adoption phase (could be a bubble that takes us to $20k before we experience any significant correction?)
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1075
they will tax the network,
increase fees, charge for wallets or something else ...but hey its ok, cause blockstream are sending up satellites lol..more like lining their pockets  Wink
ok 5yr ltr, we now sending a node to the moon, we need to raise fees again...10yr ltr , we sending a node to mars, ..guess what..higher fees lol
but its all gd...who wouldnt want nodes in space eh

I don't see anything preventing altcoins to do exactly the same.
I agree, but happening to Bitcoin..really? no thanks
hero member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 961
fly or die
they will tax the network,
increase fees, charge for wallets or something else ...but hey its ok, cause blockstream are sending up satellites lol..more like lining their pockets  Wink
ok 5yr ltr, we now sending a node to the moon, we need to raise fees again...10yr ltr , we sending a node to mars, ..guess what..higher fees lol
but its all gd...who wouldnt want nodes in space eh

I don't see anything preventing altcoins to do exactly the same.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1530
Self made HODLER ✓
Hi bitserve,

How is a paper wallet not protected if a pc is compromised?

Paper wallets are vulnerable at any of the following moments:

- When created: Private key generation vulnerability or PC compromised.
- When redeemed: PC compromised.

They are also vulnerable in case of physical compromise during storing.

It seems the security vuln in Trezor firmware would also require physical access plus a not so simple firmware update with a hacked firmware to get access to private key.

Anyone concerned about potential physical exploits should go Ledger way. The secure element is a great enhacement in that aspect.


Armory talks about lots of security issues in their glacier protocol
link to Glacier from https://www.bitcoinarmory.com

I have a clean laptop that never sees the internet or wifi, it's got  Amory installed, and creates transactions offline, these are broadcast from an online machine that I use for everyday things and it doesn't really matter if its compromised. (transfer transactions between machines using a USB stick)
You can create and redeem paper wallets with very nearly 100% safety,


Well, that is somewhat safe. But I still don't see the advantage in security over a hardware wallet while I see the less convenience in usage.

hero member
Activity: 750
Merit: 601
Hi bitserve,

How is a paper wallet not protected if a pc is compromised?

Paper wallets are vulnerable at any of the following moments:

- When created: Private key generation vulnerability or PC compromised.
- When redeemed: PC compromised.

They are also vulnerable in case of physical compromise during storing.

It seems the security vuln in Trezor firmware would also require physical access plus a not so simple firmware update with a hacked firmware to get access to private key.

Anyone concerned about potential physical exploits should go Ledger way. The secure element is a great enhacement in that aspect.


Armory talks about lots of security issues in their glacier protocol
link to Glacier from https://www.bitcoinarmory.com

I have a clean laptop that never sees the internet or wifi, it's got  Amory installed, and creates transactions offline, these are broadcast from an online machine that I use for everyday things and it doesn't really matter if its compromised. (transfer transactions between machines using a USB stick)
You can create and redeem paper wallets with very nearly 100% safety,
legendary
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
Whoever thinks bitcoin can't be destroyed with ease when it's network traffic isn't even obfuscated should take a look at the case of The Daily Stormer, who big corporations have essentially censored it from the internet in a time span of two days:

https://blog.cloudflare.com/why-we-terminated-daily-stormer/

https://www.rferl.org/a/u-s-neo-nazi-website-russian-domain-daily-stormer/28680409.html

First they came for the nazis, but I didn't speak out, because I was not a nazi.

You understand the technical differences between a server-based Hosting and DDoS Protection and a decentralized peer-to-peer Network?

It also highlights why Bitcoin is so important. Imagine if the jews had bitcoin during WWII.
hero member
Activity: 569
Merit: 505
Whoever thinks bitcoin can't be destroyed with ease when it's network traffic isn't even obfuscated should take a look at the case of The Daily Stormer, who big corporations have essentially censored it from the internet in a time span of two days:

https://blog.cloudflare.com/why-we-terminated-daily-stormer/

https://www.rferl.org/a/u-s-neo-nazi-website-russian-domain-daily-stormer/28680409.html

First they came for the nazis, but I didn't speak out, because I was not a nazi.

You understand the technical differences between a server-based Hosting and DDoS Protection and a decentralized peer-to-peer Network?
legendary
Activity: 2758
Merit: 1075
lols, no need for big text, i dont wear glasses.
WOA...did i touch a nerve or something....chill out and go learn about satellites, you'll be surprised at what you may find out  Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 3780
Merit: 5429

was it you that was happy about blockstream satellites? ,lols , if not ..sorry lol

a few yr down the rd when 3rd party segwitcoin needs funds for this (fake) idea...they will tax the network,
increase fees, charge for wallets or something else ...but hey its ok, cause blockstream are sending up satellites lol..more like lining their pockets  Wink
ok 5yr ltr, we now sending a node to the moon, we need to raise fees again...10yr ltr , we sending a node to mars, ..guess what..higher fees lol
but its all gd...who wouldnt want nodes in space eh


Ok pal. So if you are so unhappy about it:

Instead of of bitching and crying about it here, why don't you get the fk off this sub forum, go to some BCash forum, and enjoy your crappie shitcoin clone with the 10 other shitcoin fanboys and b happy with your life?

Oh that's right, because trolls gotta troll. You guys just can't stand the thought of Bitcoin succeeding, can you? It's must really be burning you guys up. BCash is DOA, and your silly BCash forums are dead dead dead. No one cares.


Welcome to /ignore
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Whoever thinks bitcoin can't be destroyed with ease when it's network traffic isn't even obfuscated should take a look at the case of The Daily Stormer, who big corporations have essentially censored it from the internet in a time span of two days:

https://blog.cloudflare.com/why-we-terminated-daily-stormer/

https://www.rferl.org/a/u-s-neo-nazi-website-russian-domain-daily-stormer/28680409.html

First they came for the nazis, but I didn't speak out, because I was not a nazi.
legendary
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1530
Self made HODLER ✓
Hi bitserve,

How is a paper wallet not protected if a pc is compromised?

Paper wallets are vulnerable at any of the following moments:

- When created: Private key generation vulnerability or PC compromised.
- When redeemed: PC compromised.

They are also vulnerable in case of physical compromise during storing.

It seems the security vuln in Trezor firmware would also require physical access plus a not so simple firmware update with a hacked firmware to get access to private key.

Anyone concerned about potential physical exploits should go Ledger way. The secure element is a great enhacement in that aspect.
legendary
Activity: 3780
Merit: 5429
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4393
Be a bank
hmm theymos' organ went down

it used to when they wanted to crash the price

now it seems they attack it when they want a little ath action
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 512
30000 CNY lots of resistance
Jump to: