Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 16822. (Read 26711355 times)
August 01, 2017, 03:55:26 AM
Shouldn't people be buying to get bitcoin cash in 3 hour and 25 min?
August 01, 2017, 03:54:15 AM
Looks like it's dump o'clock 
August 01, 2017, 03:53:40 AM
Here we go...
August 01, 2017, 03:53:30 AM
WTF is BIP148 Coin, Jihan is tweeting about it, and i'ts a pair on Viabtc.
Is it what comes into existence if >50% miners stops supporting BIP91, or Segwit fails to lock-in on Bip91?
Is it what comes into existence if >50% miners stops supporting BIP91, or Segwit fails to lock-in on Bip91?
Kind of sounds like a test balloon.
I am wondering why some of the folks, such as Jihan doesn't just take a bullet and begin to direct his mining power against seg wit in order that it does not lock in?
Maybe he wants others to do the dirty work for him? Maybe he realizes there would be a considerable backlash if he attempted such? Maybe he realizes that others would ramp up their hash power, and maybe even miners will leave his pools?
Maybe this is a sign that he is backing out of the stupid-ass fork of bitcoin cash? how likely would that be? less than 20% It is seeming pretty likely that the hardforker nutjobs are going to go through with the fork.., right? This is where the rubber hits the road, right? Shit or get off the pot, right?
My guess is that they lost their leverage when Bip91 locked and Segwit was coming shortly after. They still had the UAHF which was planned to counter UASF so they decided to go ahead with it and use it as a threat if the 2X part dosnt activate in November ish.
BTC dropping fast. Looks like the games have begun
August 01, 2017, 03:50:57 AM
Wow, what is going on...
August 01, 2017, 03:45:12 AM
WTF is BIP148 Coin, Jihan is tweeting about it, and i'ts a pair on Viabtc.
Is it what comes into existence if >50% miners stops supporting BIP91, or Segwit fails to lock-in on Bip91?
Is it what comes into existence if >50% miners stops supporting BIP91, or Segwit fails to lock-in on Bip91?
Kind of sounds like a test balloon.
I am wondering why some of the folks, such as Jihan doesn't just take a bullet and begin to direct his mining power against seg wit in order that it does not lock in?
Maybe he wants others to do the dirty work for him? Maybe he realizes there would be a considerable backlash if he attempted such? Maybe he realizes that others would ramp up their hash power, and maybe even miners will leave his pools?
Maybe this is a sign that he is backing out of the stupid-ass fork of bitcoin cash? how likely would that be? less than 20% It is seeming pretty likely that the hardforker nutjobs are going to go through with the fork.., right? This is where the rubber hits the road, right? Shit or get off the pot, right?
August 01, 2017, 03:36:40 AM
WTF is BIP148 Coin, Jihan is tweeting about it, and i'ts a pair on Viabtc.
Is it what comes into existence if >50% miners stops supporting BIP91, or Segwit fails to lock-in on Bip91?
Is it what comes into existence if >50% miners stops supporting BIP91, or Segwit fails to lock-in on Bip91?
After Bitcoin Cash Crash the name of the game is "saving face"!
New ATH is coming in couple of days!
August 01, 2017, 03:34:44 AM
Could be, could be.
After I read that post, I recalculated my odds of receiving my BTC-e funds back at about 20% - previously I had calculated it to be about 5%, so it is great that the odds of reimbursement are increasing a little bit.
August 01, 2017, 03:27:16 AM
You'll get many opportunities to play volatility today and following few days.
this is not it yet,
this is not it yet,
August 01, 2017, 03:24:29 AM
Too bad I woke up too late to play with it from the beginning
August 01, 2017, 03:10:51 AM
Hehe the panic started ore its a markt corrextion
August 01, 2017, 03:06:53 AM
On Polo, three, in words: three, bitcoin on lending, this moment.
Never saw that before.
Not even for five percent. Time to shit in my pants.
Never saw that before.
Not even for five percent. Time to shit in my pants.
August 01, 2017, 02:56:04 AM
WTF is BIP148 Coin, Jihan is tweeting about it, and i'ts a pair on Viabtc.
Is it what comes into existence if >50% miners stops supporting BIP91, or Segwit fails to lock-in on Bip91?
Is it what comes into existence if >50% miners stops supporting BIP91, or Segwit fails to lock-in on Bip91?
August 01, 2017, 02:51:46 AM
Could someone explain me, how people are already trading Bitcoin Cash BEFORE the fork? Do they only trade "virtual" BCCs on the exchanges (like, you got 10BTC, you will have 10BCC in the Future, let's trade!)? Because if i got this right: To this point there isn't existing a single Bitcoin Cash coin, right?
August 01, 2017, 02:50:30 AM
August 01, 2017, 02:35:25 AM
Someone has a bot on https://yobit.net/en/trade/BCC/BTC buying 0.00015BTC worth of BCC 2 or 3 times a second.
Pump and dumping virtual tokens for a fork coin that doesn't even exist yet.
August 01, 2017, 02:32:21 AM
Someone has a bot on https://yobit.net/en/trade/BCC/BTC buying 0.00015BTC worth of BCC 2 or 3 times a second.
August 01, 2017, 01:48:13 AM
dont worry guys.... fork is good trend, the last time eth got forked, it fly 20x of its price. moreover, Mcafee says btc will reach 500k usd in 3 years https://www.rt.com/viral/396791-mcafee-penis-bitcoin-price/
so in three years, either we all will own some lambo or we will see some action on national tv....
so in three years, either we all will own some lambo or we will see some action on national tv....
August 01, 2017, 01:36:10 AM
That moment of the day when I'm like:
Up! Up!! Up!!!
pUmP! pUmP!! pUmP!!!
August 01, 2017, 01:30:17 AM
[edited out]
The problem here is that you can and you will find flaws for all solutions, and you can just repeat same phrases from you against SW like this
A: SW is tested and safe lets do it
B :Sounds very speculative and hypothetical to me.
A: No things are different in production compared to testnets, because miners dont cheat there....
.....
This type of discussion will never end since there are just no proper assesments behind and mathematical logic applied, missing probabilities for the desasters to happen.
What process do we need to agree upon a final logical assesment that anyone accepts as a proof?
O.k. I will admit that I was being a bit flippant in my last post, but that is not merely because I am lacking in substance, but possibly the frustration (and maybe even humor) in the fact that a lot of you big blocker nutjobs want to continue to argue about a done deal. seg wit is going to lock in and to activate, so what fucking good does it do to keep complaining with a bunch of bullshit arguments that segwit does not work when it has not even gone live yet?
There is a process for getting these kinds of things passed. Segwit passed through the process and neither 2mb upgrade, nor hardfork nor changing governance passed. Yeah those others were proposed, but they did not get accepted through the process. So, now we are on the eve of activating segwit and a bunch of nonsensical specualtion about all the things that it supposedly cannot do.. blah blah blah.. and we have not even seen the first generation of applications built upon the thing and then going live on the thing.
I'm looking forward to finding out what kinds of things are going to be built upon segwit and therefore it looks like we are truly entering into exciting times in the coming year or two.
Jump to: