Well, that's where he's completely wrong because no cryptocurrency is a store of value.
And that's where you are completely wrong, because almost anything is a "store of value". Gold is, silver is, currencies are, marble is, copper is, steel is, FIAT is, collectibles are, wood is.... everything.
Cryptocurrency is definitely not. To be a store of value, you have to be able to put up some type of fight against time and entropy itself - transferring a fungible, unchangeable unit of account from past to future regardless of any externalities. Bitcoin is not even fungible for fucks sake, nor is it durable since the system is designed to be molded by the entropy process and can transform into something completely different at the drop of a hat. Or things like rough consensus attack, cryptography failures, poorly structured incentives, etc, can implode it.
So in real, technical terms, bitcoin is the EXACT OPPOSITE of money and the exact opposite of what a store of value is. It's like I said 5000 times before, just a currency. It does not matter if late night infomercial guy Antonopolous told you it's a store of value or money. It's clearly not. Just because it's more difficult (but not impossible) to cause inflation doesn't mean it's not a currency or that it's the same thing as gold and silver.
Bitcoin is way undervalued in comparison to altcoins. That's what changed.
It's really not. I said months ago bitcoin was probably going to hit a wall once transaction fees got to around $1-2, and it got pretty damn close to that already. This is why alts are getting such action and why LTC with segwit passing will probably outperform btc gains for the time being if people are going to let bitcoin sit at 4 TPS forever. It requies scaling and probably needs a critical threshold of at least 50 TPS to survive at all.
