I'd feel much more bullish if segwit was getting activated
... member when one coin was 15 cents ?
oooooh, I member!
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 18105. (Read 26608343 times)
November 30, 2016, 07:12:32 AM
... member when one coin was 15 cents ?
oooooh, I member!
November 30, 2016, 05:29:56 AM
I'd feel much more bullish if segwit was getting activated
... member when one coin was 15 cents ?
... And you where probably looking at it like dog poop in the middle of the sidewalk before dog poop became organic fertilizer for "vegan AF" organic farmers in California?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndI9vkgw_1Y
November 30, 2016, 05:17:44 AM
I'd feel much more bullish if segwit was getting activated
November 30, 2016, 04:51:11 AM
Sorry guys cos my prediction cocern the hike in price of bitcoin last weekend fail but with the current price of bitcoin, bitcoin is gaining some lil strength
I spoke a week ago with my shaman & with my bruja sisterhood coven secretary and they clearly stated that the beaver blue moon of November predicted good fortune for my gambling habits!
But now that I see the pressure that is being accumulated ... And the thing that comes to mind is just "blunt force trauma", and the markets are raging like an angry beast that says : "I will smash you hard! Don't F* with me!"
And from that you should understand that dealing with "uncertainty BS" for now is just nonsense for anything trader under 1200$.
November 30, 2016, 03:47:33 AM
Sorry guys cos my prediction cocern the hike in price of bitcoin last weekend fail but with the current price of bitcoin, bitcoin is gaining some lil strength
November 30, 2016, 03:37:41 AM
at the moment seg wit is on the table, and those who are working towards [other solutions] don't have feasible code that has gone through the vetting process.
Well, no. BU has been running on the main chain several times longer than has The SegWit Omnibus Changeset.
I repeat ... the BU code that's actually running on main net at the moment (and therefore being 'tested' on main net) is mostly the old 0.12 core code.
None of the new block size related code is being exercised.
Bugs in the old core stuff are most unlikely since it already ran for so long (and had it's bugs fixed way back when).
Thank you Harrymmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm for pointing that out, because frequently some of these seg wit naysayers are putting out misinformation regarding the supposed "vettedness" of inadequate and likely dangerous competing code.
November 30, 2016, 03:34:46 AM
Just 'cause you incessantly do this to others...
^^^ show your work.
Once we get passed the mid $800's, the most likely price range would end up in the $3k to $5k territory
^^^ show your work.
You seem like you are trolling, butt hurt and/or feeling sorry for bitcoin deniers, big blockers and FUD spreaders, and my view of bitcoin's future is based on a combination hunches, probabilities, based on bitcoin's past performance of overshooting possibilities including rhyming.. and not necessarily repeating, also based on networking effects (including considerations of Metcalfe's law that could cause additional exponential growth periods) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metcalfe's_law
Mine is also a working hypothesis that I have had for a while (longer than a year, if I recall correctly), but I would be more than willing to tweak it or to give up upon it, if it appeared that any of the material bitcoin fundamentals were to change and justify such a giving up upon.
November 30, 2016, 03:21:40 AM
Mr Bear Dolphin is back on finex ? BTC618 ask @ $730
BTC618 is a wall for finex nowadays right?
BTC618 is a wall for finex nowadays right?
I think it is mostly just uncertainty ... Who knows... this looks like it might blow today or 3 days from now... But from what I see.. China is pretty bored, so I guess they might blow it up today!
Speaking of the devil... The China wall is rising!!!
November 30, 2016, 02:15:13 AM
Mr Bear Dolphin is back on finex ? BTC618 ask @ $730
BTC618 is a wall for finex nowadays right?
BTC618 is a wall for finex nowadays right?
I think it is mostly just uncertainty ... Who knows... this looks like it might blow today or 3 days from now... But from what I see.. China is pretty bored, so I guess they might blow it up today!
November 30, 2016, 02:14:04 AM
Mr Bear Dolphin is back on finex ? BTC618 ask @ $730
BTC618 is a wall for finex nowadays right?
BTC618 is a wall for finex nowadays right?
*Poof* and it's gone. Well he moved it up to $735
November 30, 2016, 02:09:32 AM
Mr Bear Dolphin is back on finex ? BTC618 ask @ $730
BTC618 is a wall for finex nowadays right?
BTC618 is a wall for finex nowadays right?
November 30, 2016, 01:19:06 AM
We are good at waiting 
I calculated that the peak of this bubble will be somewhere at 3400$ - 3800$ ... so 3.4k - 3.8k USD ... if they don't destroy the financial system before it will reach that point based on the actual value of the US dollar... and that meaning if they try to bury it in to the ground (the US dollar) ... we would probably see that 3.4k$ - 3.8k$ be 20-30x ... so that might be 70k$ - 90k$.
Meaning... yes... I just said that... the dollar may be devalued between 2000% and 3000% ... And the sad sheeple muricans will become a 3rd world country owned partially by China!
*edit: Venezuela 2.0!
November 30, 2016, 12:42:52 AM
at the moment seg wit is on the table, and those who are working towards [other solutions] don't have feasible code that has gone through the vetting process.
Well, no. BU has been running on the main chain several times longer than has The SegWit Omnibus Changeset.
I repeat ... the BU code that's actually running on main net at the moment (and therefore being 'tested' on main net) is mostly the old 0.12 core code.
None of the new block size related code is being exercised.
Bugs in the old core stuff are most unlikely since it already ran for so long (and had it's bugs fixed way back when).
November 30, 2016, 12:16:23 AM
at the moment seg wit is on the table, and those who are working towards [other solutions] don't have feasible code that has gone through the vetting process.
Well, no. BU has been running on the main chain several times longer than has The SegWit Omnibus Changeset.
November 30, 2016, 12:10:54 AM
Just 'cause you incessantly do this to others...
^^^ show your work.
Once we get passed the mid $800's, the most likely price range would end up in the $3k to $5k territory
^^^ show your work.
November 29, 2016, 10:30:30 PM
id like to remind everyone that
SegWit is great for Bitcoin. It brings more transaction throughput, fixes malleability, defrags the UTXO set, makes hardware wallets more secure and most importantly, it enables Lightning which will bring instant low cost Bitcoin transactions to the world. The team at BTCC have been working hard at making their exchange and mining pool services SegWit ready, and everyone else should do the same.
SegWit is great for Bitcoin. It brings more transaction throughput, fixes malleability, defrags the UTXO set, makes hardware wallets more secure and most importantly, it enables Lightning which will bring instant low cost Bitcoin transactions to the world. The team at BTCC have been working hard at making their exchange and mining pool services SegWit ready, and everyone else should do the same.
You are correct but people are forgetting one major thing; Bitcoin cannot go mainstream with just bigger blocks. You need something like 1gig blocks to make a shot for it, the internet cant even handle that. Hardforking from 1mb all the way up to 1gig is just a no-go zone, Lightning will fulfill that job because you really want to have high capacity when ''monkey see monkey do'' situation arrives.
This is correct, but: why stop natural growth at 1 MB? It's not like we'll be at 1 MB for 10 years and then BOOOOM, we scale to global level overnight.
There is nothing wrong with bigger blocks, but we need extra layers to make Bitcoin mainstream.
I agree.
Increasing blocks will be much smoother when the community, dev, miners are on the same side.
What side? The side that wants to keep the 1 MB blocksize limit? You're saying we should all agree to that in order to remove that limit? What twisted logic is used here?
You are right, i'm starting to get exhausted from this block-size debate i'll leave it for what it is for now.
November 29, 2016, 10:08:19 PM
If you are summarizing what I said in ways other than what I said, then I said what I am trying to say. On the other hand, if you are asking me to clarify or to go into more detail, then sure, I am stating my opinion based on a variety of factors, probabilities, known unknowns and unknown unknowns. And yes, more or less what I am saying, at this time, is that there is likely to be decent BTC price momentum at the point of getting passed the mid $800s... not 100% but decent likelihood.
I am not saying that anything is certain, but I am saying that it makes less sense, to me, when posters are asserting theories at this particular time and based on probabilities and various knowns and unknowns about BTC price sticking points that are seeming to be less logical than my own.. hahahahaha...
, especially if in our current price point, they are asserting BTC price sticking points in the $900 to $2000 range without providing some kind of explanation or context.. .. and therefore, $2,400 also makes little sense to me, if there is not some kind of context that would justify such an explanation (as I had attempted to provide in my earlier post on the topic).
So, to repeat, my view is not set in stone, and after matters unravel, they can begin to unravel in ways that cause my own theory to no longer make sense because matters may unravel in ways that change the theory and probabilities..
In other words, I have my theories, at this point, that I will revise under changing circumstances and as justified by the happening knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns.. and known unknowns are more probable to take place than unknown unknowns, and unknown unknowns can throw monkey wrenches in the tentative theories. So, yeah, seriously, there are various working ideas that help to plan - even though there is justification that all of the eggs would NOT be put into that basket.
Sure is a lot of words, when you could have simply stated "no."
I used as many words as I decided was adequate to respond to the issue.
Heheh.
If you just said 'nuanced no', that would do it.
But then we'd feel like we were cheated.
I don't think so. The more I think about it, the more I conclude that every single word that I used was completely and absolutely necessary.
November 29, 2016, 09:37:43 PM
If you are summarizing what I said in ways other than what I said, then I said what I am trying to say. On the other hand, if you are asking me to clarify or to go into more detail, then sure, I am stating my opinion based on a variety of factors, probabilities, known unknowns and unknown unknowns. And yes, more or less what I am saying, at this time, is that there is likely to be decent BTC price momentum at the point of getting passed the mid $800s... not 100% but decent likelihood.
I am not saying that anything is certain, but I am saying that it makes less sense, to me, when posters are asserting theories at this particular time and based on probabilities and various knowns and unknowns about BTC price sticking points that are seeming to be less logical than my own.. hahahahaha...
, especially if in our current price point, they are asserting BTC price sticking points in the $900 to $2000 range without providing some kind of explanation or context.. .. and therefore, $2,400 also makes little sense to me, if there is not some kind of context that would justify such an explanation (as I had attempted to provide in my earlier post on the topic).
So, to repeat, my view is not set in stone, and after matters unravel, they can begin to unravel in ways that cause my own theory to no longer make sense because matters may unravel in ways that change the theory and probabilities..
In other words, I have my theories, at this point, that I will revise under changing circumstances and as justified by the happening knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns.. and known unknowns are more probable to take place than unknown unknowns, and unknown unknowns can throw monkey wrenches in the tentative theories. So, yeah, seriously, there are various working ideas that help to plan - even though there is justification that all of the eggs would NOT be put into that basket.
Sure is a lot of words, when you could have simply stated "no."
I used as many words as I decided was adequate to respond to the issue.
Heheh.
If you just said 'nuanced no', that would do it.
But then we'd feel like we were cheated.
November 29, 2016, 09:33:51 PM
If you are summarizing what I said in ways other than what I said, then I said what I am trying to say. On the other hand, if you are asking me to clarify or to go into more detail, then sure, I am stating my opinion based on a variety of factors, probabilities, known unknowns and unknown unknowns. And yes, more or less what I am saying, at this time, is that there is likely to be decent BTC price momentum at the point of getting passed the mid $800s... not 100% but decent likelihood.
I am not saying that anything is certain, but I am saying that it makes less sense, to me, when posters are asserting theories at this particular time and based on probabilities and various knowns and unknowns about BTC price sticking points that are seeming to be less logical than my own.. hahahahaha...
, especially if in our current price point, they are asserting BTC price sticking points in the $900 to $2000 range without providing some kind of explanation or context.. .. and therefore, $2,400 also makes little sense to me, if there is not some kind of context that would justify such an explanation (as I had attempted to provide in my earlier post on the topic).
So, to repeat, my view is not set in stone, and after matters unravel, they can begin to unravel in ways that cause my own theory to no longer make sense because matters may unravel in ways that change the theory and probabilities..
In other words, I have my theories, at this point, that I will revise under changing circumstances and as justified by the happening knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns.. and known unknowns are more probable to take place than unknown unknowns, and unknown unknowns can throw monkey wrenches in the tentative theories. So, yeah, seriously, there are various working ideas that help to plan - even though there is justification that all of the eggs would NOT be put into that basket.
Sure is a lot of words, when you could have simply stated "no."
I used as many words as I decided was adequate to respond to the issue.
November 29, 2016, 08:31:23 PM
We may wait forever and become rich cent by cent with daytrading
No need to worry and rise any time soon
No need to worry and rise any time soon
Jump to: