Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 1826. (Read 26608384 times)

legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3038

I hate to pull a JJG on you but...

King Daddy (aka dee cornz) dont give a ratt's ass what uie-pooie wants.

(It can't be a true JJG without some small random text.)

But I have a buy the dip set at 23.5k  Embarrassed

Apparently, you're set up for DOWNity. But are you also pee-pared for UPpity?


#nobot
#captcha_me
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 4417
Top-tier crypto casino and sportsbook
legendary
Activity: 4326
Merit: 8950
'The right to privacy matters'

I hate to pull a JJG on you but...

King Daddy (aka dee cornz) dont give a ratt's ass what uie-pooie wants.

(It can't be a true JJG without some small random text.)

But I have a buy the dip set at 23.5k  Embarrassed
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3038

I hate to pull a JJG on you but...

King Daddy (aka dee cornz) dont give a ratt's ass what uie-pooie wants.

(It can't be a true JJG without some small random text.)
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
legendary
Activity: 4326
Merit: 8950
'The right to privacy matters'
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1891
bitcoin retard
I am not sure negative or positive impact EFTs but some news come with continues, Cointelegraph published news few hours ago caption is "Bitcoin ETFs: Even worse for crypto than central exchanges",

Your link gives a 404. Here's a working link:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-etfs-even-worse-for-crypto-than-central-exchanges


TL;DR: Spot ETF is bad because paper bitcoin.

There might be some truth in that point of view, but there are relatively simple solutions.

- Make the ETF redeemable in kind (btc)

- Stake the ETF's collateral (btc) in publicly auditable addresses

However,  I doubt the current SEC administration is going to enforce or even suggest any of that.

I think that article was more on the FUD side than anything else!..

and the TL;DR is #NYKNYC

simple answers to seemingly complicated problems.  Bitcoin is an engineer's dream
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 1843
I am not sure negative or positive impact EFTs but some news come with continues, Cointelegraph published news few hours ago caption is "Bitcoin ETFs: Even worse for crypto than central exchanges",

Your link gives a 404. Here's a working link:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-etfs-even-worse-for-crypto-than-central-exchanges


TL;DR: Spot ETF is bad because paper bitcoin.

There might be some truth in that point of view, but there are relatively simple solutions.

- Make the ETF redeemable in kind (btc)

- Stake the ETF's collateral (btc) in publicly auditable addresses

However,  I doubt the current SEC administration is going to enforce or even suggest any of that.

I think that article was more on the FUD side than anything else!..

and the TL;DR is #NYKNYC
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
full member
Activity: 476
Merit: 141
sr. member
Activity: 658
Merit: 321
I like to treat everyone as a friend 🔹
BitcoinBTC is an age-old idea whose time has come. It is not new. It's just ready! May I introduce to you Nikola Tesla and Henry Ford, the pioneering giants responsible for the original idea for Bitcoin.
source
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 288
Moving does not seem to be practical advice.  How to fix from within?  How to subvert?  Of course, no one is advocating breaking laws, and so we can sometimes have tensions between speech and action of individuals and what some other individuals might want you to do or not do... Are they really representing the interests and needs of the people?  These are likely not easy decisions for any of us who might be in jurisdictions in which we do not always agree with what kinds of rules are in place that may well restrict certain important aspects of our lives, liberties, properties.... interactions and transactions of value.

If the bitcoin ban is imposed, we can already see that the interests of the people were hardly taken into account there. And if the ban is not lifted long enough for someone to accumulate enough funds, it is difficult to expect that after this will be able to somehow really affect the situation. And an attempt to use bitcoins where it is prohibited by law can lead to both the loss of all funds and criminal prosecution.

The world has become quite global in recent decades, so moving to another country, with sufficient capital for this, does not seem to be something so radical in our time. And it is much safer to live where you can legally operate your capital in bitcoins than where you have to fear persecution in anticipation of the liberalization of legislation.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
legendary
Activity: 2520
Merit: 3038
I am not sure negative or positive impact EFTs but some news come with continues, Cointelegraph published news few hours ago caption is "Bitcoin ETFs: Even worse for crypto than central exchanges",

Your link gives a 404. Here's a working link:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/bitcoin-etfs-even-worse-for-crypto-than-central-exchanges


TL;DR: Spot ETF is bad because paper bitcoin.

There might be some truth in that point of view, but there are relatively simple solutions.

- Make the ETF redeemable in kind (btc)

- Stake the ETF's collateral (btc) in publicly auditable addresses

However,  I doubt the current SEC administration is going to enforce or even suggest any of that.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
Jump to: