Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 18858. (Read 26708765 times)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
2 steps up 1.99 3 steps down

welcome to bitcoin!

Fixed Cool

i guess its time for 2 steps up again  Cool


legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
thunder isn't useful for buying 1 cup of coffee
its useful for buying 100 speate cups of coffees instantly.

Open Channel for standard bitcoin fee
send 100 payments for each cup of coffee
Close Channel for standard bitcoin fee

cool huh?

I don't get why people are worked up about this, or why this Lightning is taking such a long time to develop.
Here's a way to solve the coffee problem that's both simpler, more secure, and more elegant than Thunder Cats:
1. Walk into Starbucks.
2. Buy a gift card for 100 cups of coffee, with BTC or USD.
3. Use gift card each time you need to buy stuff from Starbucks. Functionally identical to Lightning/thunder,
4. Profit!
i agree for coffee like TX, thats the way to go.

but for things like coinbase accounts sending 1000's of payments to bitpay... lighting and or thunder is a big deal.






I'm o.k. with sticking with starbucks as an example.  We are not talking about 1 user buying several cups of coffee, but instead possibly 100 users or 1,000 users buying coffee through the day or the week or whatever period of time that the vender chooses before finally resolving with the blockchain .. and then at the end of the day,  week or month, all of the transactions are resolved that are within that channel for $.10 or whatever is the applicable fee for the whole bundle of transactions.

Each one of the "1,000 users buying coffee through the day" will have to buy a gift card open a payment channel with Starbucks. The only difference is Starbucks would have access to all the "gift card" money if sold gift cards, while no one would have access to BTC with Lightning.
So not sure what you're trying to say.

Yep... so I will concede that maybe Starbucks is not the greatest in the world example for how this may be deployed and what kinds of advantages will come through it.

Many of us already realize that bitcoin provides a lot of utility in many different ways, so frequently it is not detrimental to bitcoin merely because at this time it does not provide all of the same benefits of some other technology, such as a gift card.  As a user, we have a choice regarding which one to use for which purpose, and to decide the extent to which either or the possible avenues will benefit us, and to what extent.

Currently, none of us are going out and buying into Thunder because it remains somewhat theoretical, as compared to your example of a gift card that I can go out and buy right now, if I were to chose to do so.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
Any reason for this dump?

I felt pretty confident we would keep moving up Undecided
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
seeing a downtick -  GBTC telegraphing a move down


We have not seen the whole price movement play out yet; however, it is a bit strange to see GBTC depreciate 10% during the same period that BTC depreciates less than 1%... whether that is a telegraph or not, it remains interesting to see how these various BTC related "markets" play out during volatility periods.
legendary
Activity: 1284
Merit: 1042
Volume is getting smaller and smaller. Everybody is holding his coins it seems.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
thunder isn't useful for buying 1 cup of coffee
its useful for buying 100 speate cups of coffees instantly.

Open Channel for standard bitcoin fee
send 100 payments for each cup of coffee
Close Channel for standard bitcoin fee

cool huh?

I don't get why people are worked up about this, or why this Lightning is taking such a long time to develop.
Here's a way to solve the coffee problem that's both simpler, more secure, and more elegant than Thunder Cats:
1. Walk into Starbucks.
2. Buy a gift card for 100 cups of coffee, with BTC or USD.
3. Use gift card each time you need to buy stuff from Starbucks. Functionally identical to Lightning/thunder,
4. Profit!
i agree for coffee like TX, thats the way to go.

but for things like coinbase accounts sending 1000's of payments to bitpay... lighting and or thunder is a big deal.
I'm o.k. with sticking with starbucks as an example.  We are not talking about 1 user buying several cups of coffee, but instead possibly 100 users or 1,000 users buying coffee through the day or the week or whatever period of time that the vender chooses before finally resolving with the blockchain .. and then at the end of the day,  week or month, all of the transactions are resolved that are within that channel for $.10 or whatever is the applicable fee for the whole bundle of transactions.
i can't be sure if it actually will work out like that.
i know for sure you can open a channel make 1000's of payments and then close it.
but AFAIK a channel is open between 2 poeple and only 2 poeple.
IDK...

its very unclear how LN will play out,
and thats why i dont like it.


o.k.... that's fair enough that channels are only open through 2 people (I guess bitcoin addresses).. so application of such, would not be nearly as pie in the sky as I am speculating towards...
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 503
Bear with me
Bitcoin Block Reward Halving Countdown:
Only 55 more days!
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
I'm getting an itch to buy some coins  Tongue

Last chance to by over 450. Buy now and cry later.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
I'm getting an itch to buy some coins  Tongue
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
thunder isn't useful for buying 1 cup of coffee
its useful for buying 100 speate cups of coffees instantly.

Open Channel for standard bitcoin fee
send 100 payments for each cup of coffee
Close Channel for standard bitcoin fee

cool huh?

I don't get why people are worked up about this, or why this Lightning is taking such a long time to develop.
Here's a way to solve the coffee problem that's both simpler, more secure, and more elegant than Thunder Cats:
1. Walk into Starbucks.
2. Buy a gift card for 100 cups of coffee, with BTC or USD.
3. Use gift card each time you need to buy stuff from Starbucks. Functionally identical to Lightning/thunder,
4. Profit!
i agree for coffee like TX, thats the way to go.

but for things like coinbase accounts sending 1000's of payments to bitpay... lighting and or thunder is a big deal.






I'm o.k. with sticking with starbucks as an example.  We are not talking about 1 user buying several cups of coffee, but instead possibly 100 users or 1,000 users buying coffee through the day or the week or whatever period of time that the vender chooses before finally resolving with the blockchain .. and then at the end of the day,  week or month, all of the transactions are resolved that are within that channel for $.10 or whatever is the applicable fee for the whole bundle of transactions.

Each one of the "1,000 users buying coffee through the day" will have to buy a gift card open a payment channel with Starbucks. The only difference is Starbucks would have access to all the "gift card" money if sold gift cards, while no one would have access to BTC with Lightning.
So not sure what you're trying to say.
full member
Activity: 219
Merit: 100
seeing a downtick -  GBTC telegraphing a move down
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
thunder isn't useful for buying 1 cup of coffee
its useful for buying 100 speate cups of coffees instantly.

Open Channel for standard bitcoin fee
send 100 payments for each cup of coffee
Close Channel for standard bitcoin fee

cool huh?

I don't get why people are worked up about this, or why this Lightning is taking such a long time to develop.
Here's a way to solve the coffee problem that's both simpler, more secure, and more elegant than Thunder Cats:
1. Walk into Starbucks.
2. Buy a gift card for 100 cups of coffee, with BTC or USD.
3. Use gift card each time you need to buy stuff from Starbucks. Functionally identical to Lightning/thunder,
4. Profit!
i agree for coffee like TX, thats the way to go.

but for things like coinbase accounts sending 1000's of payments to bitpay... lighting and or thunder is a big deal.
I'm o.k. with sticking with starbucks as an example.  We are not talking about 1 user buying several cups of coffee, but instead possibly 100 users or 1,000 users buying coffee through the day or the week or whatever period of time that the vender chooses before finally resolving with the blockchain .. and then at the end of the day,  week or month, all of the transactions are resolved that are within that channel for $.10 or whatever is the applicable fee for the whole bundle of transactions.
i can't be sure if it actually will work out like that.
i know for sure you can open a channel make 1000's of payments and then close it.
but AFAIK a channel is open between 2 poeple and only 2 poeple.
IDK...

its very unclear how LN will play out,
and thats why i dont like it.
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
thunder isn't useful for buying 1 cup of coffee
its useful for buying 100 speate cups of coffees instantly.

Open Channel for standard bitcoin fee
send 100 payments for each cup of coffee
Close Channel for standard bitcoin fee

cool huh?

I don't get why people are worked up about this, or why this Lightning is taking such a long time to develop.
Here's a way to solve the coffee problem that's both simpler, more secure, and more elegant than Thunder Cats:
1. Walk into Starbucks.
2. Buy a gift card for 100 cups of coffee, with BTC or USD.
3. Use gift card each time you need to buy stuff from Starbucks. Functionally identical to Lightning/thunder,
4. Profit!
i agree for coffee like TX, thats the way to go.

but for things like coinbase accounts sending 1000's of payments to bitpay... lighting and or thunder is a big deal.






I'm o.k. with sticking with starbucks as an example.  We are not talking about 1 user buying several cups of coffee, but instead possibly 100 users or 1,000 users buying coffee through the day or the week or whatever period of time that the vender chooses before finally resolving with the blockchain .. and then at the end of the day,  week or month, all of the transactions are resolved that are within that channel for $.10 or whatever is the applicable fee for the whole bundle of transactions.


sr. member
Activity: 295
Merit: 250
yes its good that there will be at least 2 teams competing for the best second layer solution.

I'm still not sure i like second layers scaling, but at least there's a good chance this health competition results in a strong second layer.

Will thunder go from alpha to beta, then to release faster than it takes lightning to go to release? The one with the first mover advantage will probably win the competition. All the publicity I read was about lightning, and now it seems thunder might beat lightning to market.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
yes its good that there will be at least 2 teams competing for the best second layer solution.

I'm still not sure i like second layers scaling, but at least there's a good chance this health competition results in a strong second layer.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
thunder isn't useful for buying 1 cup of coffee
its useful for buying 100 speate cups of coffees instantly.

Open Channel for standard bitcoin fee
send 100 payments for each cup of coffee
Close Channel for standard bitcoin fee

cool huh?

I don't get why people are worked up about this, or why this Lightning is taking such a long time to develop.
Here's a way to solve the coffee problem that's both simpler, more secure, and more elegant than Thunder Cats:
1. Walk into Starbucks.
2. Buy a gift card for 100 cups of coffee, with BTC or USD.
3. Use gift card each time you need to buy stuff from Starbucks. Functionally identical to Lightning/thunder,
4. Profit!
i agree for coffee like TX, thats the way to go.

but for things like coinbase accounts sending 1000's of payments to bitpay... lighting and or thunder is a big deal.
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
thunder isn't useful for buying 1 cup of coffee
its useful for buying 100 speate cups of coffees instantly.

Open Channel for standard bitcoin fee
send 100 payments for each cup of coffee
Close Channel for standard bitcoin fee

cool huh?

I don't get why people are worked up about this, or why this Lightning is taking such a long time to develop.
Here's a way to solve the coffee problem that's both simpler, more secure, and more elegant than Thunder Cats:
1. Walk into Starbucks.
2. Buy a gift card for 100 cups of coffee, with BTC or USD.
3. Use gift card each time you need to buy stuff from Starbucks. Functionally identical to Lightning/thunder,
4. Profit!
legendary
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000
☑ ♟ ☐ ♚
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
Preliminary testing on the thunder network

Releves promising results
Jump to: