whats up with all those zeros in the second exchange?
Looks like Bitstamp changed the format they're sending the bid and ask back as. I'll throw in some code to compensate sometime. i'm not looking at this group very much at the moment.
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19041. (Read 26609929 times)
March 13, 2016, 02:34:36 PM
Looks like Bitstamp changed the format they're sending the bid and ask back as. I'll throw in some code to compensate sometime. i'm not looking at this group very much at the moment.
March 13, 2016, 02:13:26 PM
"Xapo President Ted Rogers Blasts Blockstream And Mentions Ethereum"
http://bitcoinist.net/xapo-president-ted-rogers-blasts-blockstream-and-mentions-ethereum/
VCs and banks drank the koolaid and actually believe eth can be a comercially viable product. It can't. They're taking Vitalik's word for it because somebody told them he was a genius. The entire purpose of eth is redundantly executed code, which means god awful scaling and low load capacity. For it to be used by more than a handful of people, they would have to use a partitioned network, but:
A) Partitioning defeats the entire purpose of redundantly executed code giving Eth no reason to exist
B) It's not actually possible for them to do so. There are limits to distributed systems like CAP theorem, just like the laws of physics, that don't allow you to do things without making huge tradeoffs.
C) Any recursive system without outside entropy is by definition a permissioned ledger and not anti-fragile. It's not a decentralized currency, just a company that likely illegaly sold shares for a non-viable product bypassing normal channels to do so. Same thing with garbage like Factcom.
March 13, 2016, 02:04:10 PM
btc-e working again
March 13, 2016, 02:01:20 PM
March 13, 2016, 01:57:54 PM
Wow, ETH is still performing...
When I come to this forum and see every other post mention ETH, it indicates to me that the fruit has fully ripened.
i am with you. on the other hand, the eth-fanatics seem to be not as assholish as i would expect after a 30-60 fold rise of their investment. man, just imagine how us bitcoiners would feel if bitcoin would do another 50 fold!?
imagine one bitcoin = $200 000,-
us bitcoiners would act like being the new kaisers of the universe. we would think we would own the world. (and we would, too
) March 13, 2016, 01:35:15 PM
"Xapo President Ted Rogers Blasts Blockstream And Mentions Ethereum"
http://bitcoinist.net/xapo-president-ted-rogers-blasts-blockstream-and-mentions-ethereum/
March 13, 2016, 01:31:16 PM
Of course, you have a right to post in response to whatever you like, and you certainly have plenty of companions in this same thread, in many other forum threads and in redit/bitcoin whining, exaggerating and spreading the same kinds of misinformation about the same topic.
In my thinking it rises to the level of whining because it appears to be deceptive in a variety of ways.
Many of you goofballs engage in all kinds of fancy dancing in order to describe various scares about technical issues that don't really exist because when push comes to shove, you are not really concerned about technical issues (at least those who really understand the matter) but instead just want to whine, whine and whine and you want to insist on a hardfork or some other governance matter, which is really about disrupting while at the same time blaming the other side rather than attempts at resolution of potential technicalities in a reasonable and responsible manner.
Possibly, half of you are paid shills, another 1/3 are misinformed or super emotional. If these supposed technical matters had been presented continuously, argued and evidence set forth as a technical issue, then possibly there may have been some attempt at resolution, but based on the much illogical insistence on hard forks and other blackmailing attempts, i get the sense that technicalities continue to be exaggerated, which seems to be the case whenever looking into any details or evidence in support of technical block limit problem matters.
Furthermore, the next move after seeing multiple flaws in the overall technical arguments, trolls like you tend to want to drag the topic into the weeds in order to distract and divert, when in the end all you seem to want is a hardfork (which gets us back to governance rather than real and concrete technical matters regarding possible problems with the current blocksize limits).
I didn't expect you to resort to name calling after running out of arguments. I guess I overestimated you.
Goodnight.
I don't really consider my comments to you as name calling. I believe that I am just describing the dynamic that causes me to wonder why people seem to be get so worked up in arms regarding this whole matter because it remains very deceptive in its appearance in the pushing of XT and Classic that are something other than they appear to be.
It's quite remarkable that a moderator deleted my "O really?" reply to this post (with the names I was being called marked bold in the above text) for being off-topic, but didn't remove this one I was replying to. Baffling.
I'm not sure what you find so remarkable (or baffling) to have your post removed when you provide a pretty much non-substantive response that merely write 1 or 2 words, a little styling emphasis and clutters the thread with repetition that a moderator may find such a post lacking in value added.
On the other hand, moderator(s) seem to have been quite gracious to you by not removing a lot of your other low quality posts in your line of interchanges with me in recent days (including your above stupid-ass post that seems to merely attempt to draw negative implications regarding moderating practices, and to whine about such and without good reason). Possibly, the moderators have been gracious to allow some of your repetitive posts because even though you have been generally going over the same thing over and over and in different words, at least there arguably had been some substance in some of the points of your earlier posts (I emphasize "arguably"), lame as such substance may have been.
March 13, 2016, 01:00:38 PM
March 13, 2016, 12:56:50 PM
"Xapo President Ted Rogers Blasts Blockstream And Mentions Ethereum"
http://bitcoinist.net/xapo-president-ted-rogers-blasts-blockstream-and-mentions-ethereum/
March 13, 2016, 12:36:08 PM
whats up with all those zeros in the second exchange?
the price seems to be growing slowly right now, but it does not show any signs of a fast growth, i hope it will return to all time high because im holding like never before
the price seems to be growing slowly right now, but it does not show any signs of a fast growth, i hope it will return to all time high because im holding like never before
March 13, 2016, 12:00:51 PM
March 13, 2016, 11:43:41 AM
plx ddos messing up my morning
March 13, 2016, 11:00:55 AM
March 13, 2016, 10:56:27 AM
Aaaaaand people are having withdrawal issues on Poloniex.
Gox 7: The Ethering
Link or get the FUD out
there was lag in the exchange, thats all...
I saw some people complaining about maxed out withdrawal limits without having made any withdrawals.
@Dotto polo trollbox, nothing firm. I guess a lot of people are pulling out of polo to jump on the finex train.
i just withdrawing my dash, there are terrible lag, but my coin was sent in few minute. no prob with withdrawal limit either.
March 13, 2016, 10:51:37 AM
Aaaaaand people are having withdrawal issues on Poloniex.
Gox 7: The Ethering
Link or get the FUD out
there was lag in the exchange, thats all...
I saw some people complaining about maxed out withdrawal limits without having made any withdrawals.
@Dotto polo trollbox, nothing firm. I guess a lot of people are pulling out of polo to jump on the finex train.
March 13, 2016, 10:32:59 AM
Aaaaaand people are having withdrawal issues on Poloniex.
Gox 7: The Ethering
Link or get the FUD out
there was lag in the exchange, thats all...
March 13, 2016, 10:31:51 AM
March 13, 2016, 10:21:50 AM
Aaaaaand people are having withdrawal issues on Poloniex.
Gox 7: The Ethering
March 13, 2016, 10:09:09 AM
Anyone knows wazzup with BTC-E?
March 13, 2016, 10:00:44 AM
Jump to: