Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 1935. (Read 26709486 times)

It's not cancelled, what you talking about? It was picked up by Netflix after Channel 4 ditched it in favour for all the crap they usually show years ago.

It's relatively successful from what I've seen so I'm sure they will continue with a season 7. They're just very slow in making it all the time as Charlie Brooker writes almost all the stories.

Season 6 is ok. Some of it is meh, some of it is pretty good. The photographer episode was far too short and jumped around too much at the start. I fail to see the reason for the 5 minute Czech Republic setting. The Loch Henry episode felt incomplete and not really Black Mirror material. Some strange choices at times.
The Demon '79 episode is my favourite (still a few things could have been better but almost really great). I'd like to see more of that type of stuff (a specific time setting - it had excellent music/song choices that helped to create the believable atmosphere).

It's definitely not as good as the likes of Twilight Zone used to be (the original series).

But definitely a better than average watch I would say.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

gotta keep people occupied with stupid shit... deep thinking not wanted

Yeah, it was great not sure why got cancelled.

Everything I like gets cancelled and pure unadulterated garbage gets put in its place.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

O/T.
Anyone been watching the black mirror series?
Just caught up on season 6.
This sort of stuff is right up my street.
Love it.
First episode of season 6 even has Selma Hayak in it!

Love it!

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Not sure why they are in such situation with EU being right there and positive demographics.
Could be temporary, i dunno. All "strategists" are saying that Turkey would be a significant "player" going forward.

"250K median, with 180K-320K being the range for the next ATH"....a super-bot whispered in my ear.
True story.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Turkish lira vs USD is down 81% since Jan 2019 and 5% since yesterday. Bitcoin solves this, unless you are mindrust 

wanna bet ?   

Haha, I forgot about that. I don’t think he cares though after catching the Binance scam pump. Congrats on that by the way JJG.


Observing $30,068!
Back over $30,000 after J Powell said they will increase rates another 2 times this year (I dunno why that still causes a reaction in the market btw).

I’m looking for us to make a new yearly high before declaring the beginning of a new bull market. I think it stands at $30,800? I could be wrong!

Would be great to head into 2024 as we reach the halving at $40,000 to $45,000. Anything over $35,000 puts us in the driving seat for the bull run we were promised and robbed of in 2021 due to CHY-NAH banning bitcoin and COVID fall out. I really think $180,000 or more in 2025 is a lock in. Could go much higher with Blackrock and Fidelity plus others involved but $180,000 seems like a good target.

Look forward to the rocket gifs & memes

@JJG...sooner or later...developers would have to address concerns like mine.
Some others state that the loss rate is maybe even 4% a year now, which is kind of high (https://blog.trezor.io/what-happens-to-lost-bitcoin-71eb5a80cc74).
I think that it is inevitable that some solution would be advanced (once we find out the actual rate of loss).
Could some solutions cause a fork? Hopefully not, but we shall see.

However I see most of bitcoiners solidly supporting the idea of no more than 21 mil btc, but maybe not the idea of a constant decrease in that number (or what is actually available).
To me, personally, the idea of supply shriveling to a few bitcoins and then dealing with fractions of satoshi to buy houses sounds positively Kafkaesque.
EDIT: btw, that hisslyness post you fondly refer to does not 'work' if we lose a set number of bitcoins per year (around 286K or 1.36% of the whole supply). He actually made a distinction between 75 years (in his calculation) counting as a fixed number lost/year OR 1231 years if a fixed % of current supply is lost for a year. I was talking about the former, but it flew over your head somehow. Sometimes you just need to read stuff more carefully.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

I thought that Hisslyness's post already pretty clearly pointed out the maths in terms of taking more than 1,200 years to get down to less than 1 BTC.. so the BTC does not disappear, even if you presume a constant loss rate of 1.36% per year (which is also not realistic)... and you seem crazy to suggest that all of a sudden bitcoin's supply would go to zero when we should be working with your presumption of a 1.36% loss rate.. which may or may not be realistic... which also was addressed by hissleyness's post.


Maybe you are on some kind of a weird mental exercise that really is not seeming to be very well connected to real facts or even realistic speculations regarding what is happening and what might happen down the road, if things were to remain constant based on the current speculated BTC loss rate.


Oh thank you so muchie.



I was starting to think that I was going to lose my day.

 

Do you expect this here boi to beg?




Fuck crypto.


Yes.. Not financial advice; however, are you prepared for either BTC price direction?  And are you prepared for $34k-$35k not being an actual top? 

How are you playing this whole matter?  For some reason, you sound a bit like a no coiner or a low coiner.

Do you have enough coin, or are you waiting for a BTC price dip in order to buy some?  Or are you just cheering for the BTC price to go down, because if you don't have any BTC plan, then you are likely NOT in very good shape when it comes to personal finances.

Since you are such a smartie panties, you do realize that the 200-week moving average is currently $26,548? 

Does the 200-week moving average play into how likely you consider certain BTC price dips to be in the coming weeks/months or otherwise? and the likelihood that there would be "gradual" downity that actually brings us back below the 200-week moving average, if such a thing were to happen.

I have my doubts about the soundness of logic for people who are considering current BTC prices to be toppy in any kind of significant/meaningful kind of way...except maybe if they are considering possible corrections back down to the 200-week moving average.. but still temporary corrections?  Longer term corrections?  We don't exactly seem to be in a consolidation location currently, especially since we have already been here for quite a long time..maybe even a few years if we want to consider the 2017 $19,666 top (but it does not really seem to be a good idea to be assessing bitcoin's price from the 2017 top, but instead to be looking at the last few years, at least since 2020.. even though some people believe that we need to look at 2019 in terms of a pattern of where we might be currently.. .. and it does seem to be problematic to get caught up too much on the patterns even though they can help to inform us regarding bitcoin dynamics and bitcoin seeming to be a quite larger (maybe even 10x, 20x or more large?) than it was in 2019.


Oh?  Does anyone got time for that?  #askingforafriend


That is be called:  NOT!!!!!


Well?  Isn't it true that you are a troll?  You seem to have had admitted it, right there........pppphhhhhhhhiiiiiiiiiillllllliiiiiiiipppppppmmmmmmmaaaaaaa11111199 99995555577777.



How about you refer to me as bubble boy?  Would that make uie-pooies ffffeeelwws  MOAR betters?

Checks what day it is...

FUCK YOU JJG!