Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19716. (Read 26609319 times)

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

the community is not represented by loud mouths on twitter and reddit you chump

if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off.

Nobody likes Bitcoin as it is. That's why everyone is screaming for more and better developers.

Did you volunteer yet?

Who's going to lead development of your new coin. Peter R?

Well Bitcoin Unlimited already has approaching 2% of the network in only a few days. Not a bad start. Keep your head in the sand old chap.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
Thank you

No problem.

That guy is more annoying than me. And that's too much.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Warning: Confrmed Gavinista
Meanwhile BankAmericoin, Applecoin, FBcoin and others are going to roll out their products and the first mover advantage will be squandered.

You seem to be missing the point of why we are here.

BTC is not first mover in the ...centralized payment systems or centralized currencies space. The systems you mention, if they are ever created, will compete with visa, paypal, etc: Centralized stuff.

Good point. Remember that bitcoin is actual value - all the others are just intermediaries for fiat. Paypal and Apple and the others never touch a red cent - they are just notification layers.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
Arguing that there is no valid reason to raise the block size limit now doesn't address the issue. The issue is that there is no condition known that will cause Core to raise the limit and no known process by which they would do so. So IF for example, every single block was full for a week and fees go up 100X what they are now, we still don't know how long it would take for the problem to be fixed or even if Core would consider that a problem worth fixing.

We don't even know if there is to be a permanent schedule of increases or a permanent sitting committee to determine such things so we can go through this whole damn thing again in a year or two.

What is the fair price for a transaction fee in the absence of a free market? There is no such thing, only the arbitrary judgement of fallible human controllers.

The philosophical issue boils down to Rule of Law vs. Rule of Man.  Is economic policy in the hands of impartial code or in the hands of corruptible, biased humans? 

Do we really need another monetary system held hostage to central planners? We need a hard-coded solution, not a goddamned committee. The blocksize limit doesn't just create a market for transaction fees. It creates a market for influence over the people controlling the cap.



hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Warning: Confrmed Gavinista
Bitcoin is not about community, it is about money.

+1

Romanian Gypsy turds usually roll around in threesomes, where's icebreaker?   Grin

legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015
Welt Am Draht
It looks like it's time to rent a barn in the boonies, dig a pit and throw the various block factions down it covered in olive oil and naked as the day they were born. The first one to emerge from it alive dictates where we're headed.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

the community is not represented by loud mouths on twitter and reddit you chump

if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off.

Nobody likes Bitcoin as it is. That's why everyone is screaming for more and better developers.

Seriously, if you want Bitcoin as it is you'll have to do a MaggieCoin fork where you arrest its development and take the rest of your inbred sect with you.

GMaxwell can be your leader.


Instead of coming up with an adequate response I'll just edit your post and write some nonsense.

I know. I'm a fucking loser.


Sorry to hear that.

But don't be too hard on yourself. Life can throw you a curveball from time to time. It's not the end of the world.
hero member
Activity: 748
Merit: 500
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

the community is not represented by loud mouths on twitter and reddit you chump

if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off.

Nobody likes Bitcoin as it is. That's why everyone is screaming for more and better developers.

Seriously, if you want Bitcoin as it is you'll have do a MaggieCoin fork where you arrest its development and take the rest of your inbred sect with you.

GMaxwell can be your leader.


Thank you
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 504
Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 504
Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

the community is not represented by loud mouths on twitter and reddit you chump

if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off.

Nobody likes Bitcoin as it is. That's why everyone is screaming for more and better developers.

Did you volunteer yet?

Who's going to lead development of your new coin. Peter R?
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

the community is not represented by loud mouths on twitter and reddit you chump

if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off.

Nobody likes Bitcoin as it is. That's why everyone is screaming for more and better developers.

Seriously, if you want Bitcoin as it is you'll have to do a MaggieCoin fork where you arrest its development and take the rest of your inbred sect with you.

GMaxwell can be your leader.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
Meanwhile BankAmericoin, Applecoin, FBcoin and others are going to roll out their products and the first mover advantage will be squandered.

You seem to be missing the point of why we are here.

BTC is not first mover in the ...centralized payment systems or centralized currencies space. The systems you mention, if they are ever created, will compete with visa, paypal, etc: Centralized stuff.
legendary
Activity: 861
Merit: 1010
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

the community is not represented by loud mouths on btctalk and reddit you chump

if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off.

Bitcoin is not about community, it is about money.
Bitcoin is not about money, it's about settlement layer (dixit Blockstream employees).
hero member
Activity: 748
Merit: 500
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

the community is not represented by loud mouths on twitter and reddit you chump

if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off.

And who decide what community is representing Bitcoin exactly? You? So when someone (most people or at least large group of people) is not happy with current development of Bitcoin you say him fuck off or fork off? How is that different from the goverments? Play by our rules or you go to jail...Play by our rules or fuck off....Well, we will see who will be right in the end but i am sure that if censoring ideas, discussions and arguments and people with closed mind like you will effect bitcoin in any way, we have lost the fight for freedom of finance and other uses, bitcoin could have
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

the community is not represented by loud mouths on btctalk and reddit you chump

if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off.

Bitcoin is not about community, it is about money.

hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 504
Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF

 Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

the community is not represented by loud mouths on btctalk and reddit you chump

if you don't like Bitcoin as it is, YOU fork off.
hero member
Activity: 748
Merit: 500
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF

lol 1MButthurt strong here.

I forgot i am in speculation thread, i don't know why i expected mature arguments from people like you  Grin
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
Block size increases, altcoin proposals like XT & Bitcoin Unlimited etc can be discussed here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1162684.4360

Segregated Witness will be carried out so can you guys discuss block sizes in the relevant thread.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
Conspicuously missing from the Blockstream roadmap are any specifics such as:

At X time, the block size limit will be increased by Y amount

When X% of blocks are full, the limit will be raised by Y amount

At X difficulty level, X transaction fee level, X number of nodes, etc...

Simple: there is no plan to increase the block size through a hard fork anytime soon seeing as there is no valid reasons to do so.

Fork off if that doesn't make you happy.

Why don't you, small blockers, fork off? Most people want raised block size...most people = bitcoin...if you don't hear the community, YOU FORK OFF

lol 1MButthurt strong here.
Jump to: