Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 1981. (Read 26709943 times)

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Feels like although there are still plenty of market risks ahead like mtgox, government auctions, more regulatory battles, investors have priced that in and are filling their bags in preparation of the run up to the halving. I’d feel pretty good about scooping some up at this time and at these levels. I think you’re facing a potential 20% risk while having a very large upside.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

...

Recently we were visiting London.  I had read somewhere that the UK authorities had banned BTC ATMs because, well, reasons.  coinatmradar.com did (and still does) show some +/- 10 such BTMs in greater London.  So, being the sort I am (I did not want to hang around my wife and her friend doing boring tourist stuff) went to check one out.

Well, it turns out that I found one that would sell me BTC without asking for ID or even an SMS by cellphone.  Just put your money in, and get BTC out.  Worked just fine.

BTM located in a market with an ethnic name close to the Angel subway station ("Northern Line").

When I travel to other countries, I like to buy BTC as a souvenir, smile.  It also gets me to visit places I otherwise would likely not visit.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

It's Sunday already somewhere (like Japan)...

bitcoin opens your mind
is this singularity?
maybe, maybe not

#haiku

It’s almost Bitcoin Haiku Season again.

You KNOW that Bitcoin Haiku Season started the last bull run.

So be prepared!

5-7-5

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

“The S&P is underperforming the inflation rate… investing consists of losing your money fast, or losing your money slow.
https://twitter.com/WalkerAmerica/status/1667457251865505792?t=hz2b8x4kvzT7x_MrblqM8w&s=19

I think you are overthinking in this regard because new users are also eligible to post on this thread and if a new user posts some valuable information then nothing is wrong with that. The sendable merits are in the hands of the user who possess those and they have the power and right to send those merits to even newbies.

The scams and scammers are everywhere and they aren't part of a local board, but even join those local boards for the same purpose. Do you think that such users are honest with their respected local board threads?

I don't think that those scammers are even generous with those local threads and they join those threads only for the same purpose as for which they post here. And, it's literally impossible to consider someone scammer until their scamming activity is found and reported by users.

So basically this guys are the only ones who are happy about the war no? They have 000000000000000000000000000000 chances of get deported to the USA, also maybe they can acces to a medal from russia goverment.

yawn... the last two months feel like a year long bear market...

Oh? whatever.. .. fine

Publicly lambast me!   

I admit that I did not realize that there are three options.   fml


Yeah..

that's right it is not an easy task


easier said than done.


What kinds of due diligence or otherwise changes to the merit distribution policies/practices are you proposing?

Are we going to make a list of the problematic members who are receiving?  well I am not going to necessarily concede that I am going to change my current practices of sending smerits absent some kind of agreeable proposal.. or maybe some of the restrictions on smerit sending would have to be forced upon some of us (including yours truly) who are sending smerits.. because some of us might not necessarily volunteer to it.. or even consider the problem to be as BIG as other members perceive the problem to be...and it is not even a new problem.. even though yeah the merit system has ONLY been in place since early 2018.. so 5.5 years, so far.

highlighting abusive members (whether receivers or senders) seems somewhat feasible but not really feasible at the same time in terms of necessarily causing some of us (whether myself or anyone else) from actually sending smerits if we might come to different conclusions in regards to whether a smerit(s) might be sent to such perceived to be "undeserving" member, and I am not even sure if the harm is as great as you seem to be suggesting it to be.. .but hey.. there are other members in these here parts who also agree with your "concerns" about the merit farmers and believe that newbies should not be eligible to receive merits absent some higher bar levels.....and surely we might realize that this is no exclusive or elite thread, even if it is already known as the most prolific thread and also the most merit receiving thread.. and that has been known for many years (but maybe the word is getting out, right?.. right? right?) ..

...and I have reservations regarding the practicality of any of the suggestions that have been made so far.... and even suggestions that members must have a certain number of merits to post in this here thread sounds all fine and dandy in theory.. but surely problematic in practice and even problematic if any of us think about the matter beyond some kind of concerns that undeserving people (or bots) are receiving merits because they "know how to work the system," and I have my doubts that theymos would be agreeable to proposals that may well cause more costs than benefits --- in terms of stifling forum participation.. .. if some form of merit threshold or exclusivity might be what you might be considering as a possible way of dealing with the matter... because some of us who send smerits are not likely going to appreciate micro-managing attempts at our discretion, even if proposed with decently good intentions.

Another thing that members do is to publicly shame some of the posters, and sometimes that might cause them to go away or to refrain from posting or at least the level of their seeming abuse is highlighted but still does not mean that those same perceived to be abusive members might not still end up receiving merits.

Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com

Why suddenly we find a new user start posting on this thread?

I did a few checks and I found those sudden members either belong to the Pakistan local board or the Bangladesh. IMO this thread is getting hacked by these guys.

Because of multiple scams from users associated with the new local boards, I think those who are active on this board should check before giving any merits. I am aware it is not an easy task.

My only intention was to prevent scammers from getting merits as this thread is one of the easiest way to gain merits.

Good point
Philip
ma
1957

what's better

or what is worser

being a rich poor guy?

or

being a poor rich guy?

 


Relatively speaking, many of us likely realize that just being able to live with food, lodging and perhaps a few other conveniences without too many burdens is a kind of richness.. and so in that regard, sometimes we might consider from which basket of value are we going to spend in order that we can pay for our food, lodging and other conveniences? 

Are we going to run out?

is there fear of running out?

I will concede that probably many times there are going to be some fears.. even if we might feel that our basic needs are currently being met and there seem to exist ongoingly good likelihoods of continuing to be able to meet those.

Russian hackers have been charged for laundering 647,000 #Bitcoin from Mt. Gox



Details : Click

Poor is okay.  But frankly I am not rich which does not mean I am poor.

@philipma1957 do understand you failure and your frustration. You being a legendary should understand that no one follows you principal of being poor.


Your experience proves how much you have a sense of dignity. I assume none, as you discuss about a shit coin. May be you are bluffing or this event is a sarcastic approach.

If not then you will get fcuk everytime when a shitshotcoin is involved.