Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19886. (Read 26608922 times)

hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
PS. Apparently the recent price movements were not related to the news about Craig Wright.  

The guy has been established to be a fraudster who planted lots of false evidence about other things, and his knowledge of computer science seems to be very limited.  Therefore, the evidence that he is Satoshi is likely to be faked as well.

It seems that the main target of his scams was the Australian government.  He created a tangled web of companies that closed various "research" contracts with each other, amounting to more than 100 M AUD; and then he used those contracts to get maybe 50 M AUD or more from government research incentive programs.  He may have defrauded private investors as well.  

He claimed that many of those multimillion contracts were paid in bitcoin; which may have been just an excuse for the lack of bank records proving that the companies had that money to begin with, and that the payments were real.  That may help explain why he started to plant clues that he was Satoshi, including backdated blog posts and a supposedly leaked contract with a deceased American colleague that established an offshore trust fund with 1.1 M BTC, to be locked up until 2020. (But there are several other possible explanations for why he wanted to be identified with Satoshi.)

In particular, he claimed to own the 15th largest supercomputer in the world, the largest privately held one.  He even gave (totally hilarious) masters-level lectures on supercomputer programming at his university, which included lab exercises with remote access to an "access node" of his supercomputer.  He also posted a video on YouTube where he discused his supercomputer and showed an intern working on some visual node management software.  However no one has seen that machine, not even a photograph of it.  On his company's website there was a letter from SGI that boasted the use of SGI hardware in his supercomputer; however, SGI denied ever having any contact with him or his company, and knew of no such supercomputer.

The final leak of "evidence" seems to have happened when the Australian Tax Office had finally realized the extent of the scam and was about to squash him.  It seems that he fled the country just in the nick or time.  Recently he somehow got himself invited to a panel on cryptocurrencies witn Nick Szabo, Trace Mayer, and other guys.  He spoke via Skype, claiming to be in London with his family.  Like the last emails by Danny Brewster of Neo&Bee, that may have been an attempt to divert the ATO investigations to the wrong place...
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.

Alchemy at its modern day finest. Cool Thanks for this link. It's a good read. Now if they could add some of this to the pump strings. Wink



moon?

I'm telling ya! I've been interested in the elevator to space idea since Google was discussing it.
legendary
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511
Jorge, I would suggest you read this:

Because he's never heard of that before...
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.

Alchemy at its modern day finest. Cool Thanks for this link. It's a good read. Now if they could add some of this to the pump strings. Wink
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1126
It's all mathematics...!

And you're debating with an unrepenting troll  Undecided

He may well be - but I have to say that       a) stuff like this is good entertainment ( in a slightly bored and listless kind of way) on an early Saturday evening whilst I'm preparing a curry, and            
      b) I've got to agree with the troll in this particular case. I've been following this thread long enough to know that the only ones to have made real gains are holders. Calculated risk ? In a rigged market ?

BTW - my Dad was the only Heavyweight Champion of the World to receive the Noble Prize for Physics. Where does that put my argument, relative to yours ?


Anyhow, on with the curry.

As you were.

Well enjoy making your curry...
Obviously a stoner Jap.
Father was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takaaki_Kajita eh?
Curry at 3AM eh?

I bet when you ask your dad why he won the Nobel Prize, he'll tell you he did it for the lulz.

You might be on to something... Cheesy

Now my Dad just twists fatties and does volunteer work as a botanist in Arizona...

The funny thing is when I discussed BTC with him years ago he looked at me as if I had two heads. Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.

And you're debating with an unrepenting troll  Undecided

He may well be - but I have to say that       a) stuff like this is good entertainment ( in a slightly bored and listless kind of way) on an early Saturday evening whilst I'm preparing a curry, and            
      b) I've got to agree with the troll in this particular case. I've been following this thread long enough to know that the only ones to have made real gains are holders. Calculated risk ? In a rigged market ?

BTW - my Dad was the only Heavyweight Champion of the World to receive the Noble Prize for Physics. Where does that put my argument, relative to yours ?


Anyhow, on with the curry.

As you were.

Well enjoy making your curry...
Obviously a stoner Jap.
Father is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takaaki_Kajita eh?
Curry at 3AM eh?

I bet when you ask your dad why he won the Nobel Prize, he'll tell you he did it for the lulz.



Jorge, I would suggest you read this:

http://www.coindesk.com/bot-named-willy-did-mt-goxs-automated-trading-pump-bitcoin-price/

Also, this:

http://willyreport.wordpress.com/

Someone is sticking their Willy all up in Huobi. She's so happy to have him. Especially when the massive swings don't match the volume. That's when you really feel the Willy up in her.
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
I have an immensely important question I want to ask since I was just told something, why does the price move the way it does?it goes up by 10-20$s then completely stops. And how much does it take to make it to 10$s plus?

Looking at the daily price and volume at Huobi, OKCoin, and other exchanges, I can see

(1) A gradual "exponential" increase in volume and price from about 2015-09-20 to the peak (~3350 CNY) on 11-04;
(2) A tumbling price and volume drop between 11-04 and 11-24 (down to ~2050 CNY);
(3) A very sharp increase in volume to a record high value on 11-24, that persisted until now; and a corresponding rally in price, by a rapid steady rise broken by several large jumps (to ~3150 CNY).

There was a partial crash today, to ~2800 CNY, but it is not clear yet how it will end.

There seems to be no certain explanation for these moves.  (And it seems that no one wants to find out...)

My best candidate explanation for (1) is still the bitcoin-based MMM ponzi and copycats, mostly in China; amplified by day-trader speculation.  The dates seem to match, the ponzi can easily move that amount of money, and the gradual "exponential" growth is consistent with the demand for bitcoins spreading among a new population of  by "infection".

The crash (2) would then be the speculators dumping their coins when they realized that the primary demand had leveled off.   Perhaps the ponzi saturated by 11-04, or participants ("lucky victims" and organizers) started to sell the bitcoins that they received.  

The new rally (3) could be due to the same cause as (1); however, considering the much higher volume and the way it grew (suddenly rather than gradually), the cause is probably different.

Rally (3) may have been due to the crackdown by the Chinese government on the use of the Chinese state credit/debit card (UnionPay) to export cash for gambling and other purposes.  The abuse seemed to be pervasive in Macau, the Las Vegas of China, which has a somewhat independent economy (like Hong Kong). Reports say that Mainland gamblers would go to Macau, pretend to buy merchandise at local pawn shops with the card, then pretend to return it for a cash refund (minus the shop's commission).  That way they could bypass the card's limit on cash withdrawal.  If that loophole was suddenly closed, it seems possible that the gamblers switched en masse to bitcoin.  

A sudden jump in the price must be due to single person buying or selling a large amount of bitcoin in a short time interval.  If the above explanation is correct, those may be exceptionally wealthy people trying to move their money out, or perhaps clandestine money transmitters providing that service for many smaller clients.  Either way, the jumps seem to indicate that the price is determined by a relatively small number of players.

Your putting too much thought into this. People had a whole year to accumulate bitcoins in the $2xx range, whenever the price is in the mid $400s they can sell and double their money, and for every coin they sell they end up with a free one. It's gonna be a rough road to get past $500 because of this, but I think it will happen.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1126
It's all mathematics...!

And you're debating with an unrepenting troll  Undecided

He may well be - but I have to say that       a) stuff like this is good entertainment ( in a slightly bored and listless kind of way) on an early Saturday evening whilst I'm preparing a curry, and            
      b) I've got to agree with the troll in this particular case. I've been following this thread long enough to know that the only ones to have made real gains are holders. Calculated risk ? In a rigged market ?

BTW - my Dad was the only Heavyweight Champion of the World to receive the Noble Prize for Physics. Where does that put my argument, relative to yours ?


Anyhow, on with the curry.

As you were.

Well enjoy making your curry...
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
I have an immensely important question I want to ask since I was just told something, why does the price move the way it does?it goes up by 10-20$s then completely stops. And how much does it take to make it to 10$s plus?

Looking at the daily price and volume at Huobi, OKCoin, and other exchanges, I can see

(1) A gradual "exponential" increase in volume and price from about 2015-09-20 to the peak (~3350 CNY) on 11-04;
(2) A tumbling price and volume drop between 11-04 and 11-24 (down to ~2050 CNY);
(3) A very sharp increase in volume to a record high value on 11-24, that persisted until now; and a corresponding rally in price, by a rapid steady rise broken by several large jumps (to ~3150 CNY).

There was a partial crash today, to ~2800 CNY, but it is not clear yet how it will end.

There seems to be no certain explanation for these moves.  (And it seems that no one wants to find out...)

My best candidate explanation for (1) is still the bitcoin-based MMM ponzi and copycats, mostly in China; amplified by day-trader speculation.  The dates seem to match, the ponzi can easily move that amount of money, and the gradual "exponential" growth is consistent with the demand for bitcoins spreading among a new population of  by "infection".

The crash (2) would then be the speculators dumping their coins when they realized that the primary demand had leveled off.   Perhaps the ponzi saturated by 11-04, or participants ("lucky victims" and organizers) started to sell the bitcoins that they received.  

The new rally (3) could be due to the same cause as (1); however, considering the much higher volume and the way it grew (suddenly rather than gradually), the cause is probably different.

Rally (3) may have been due to the crackdown by the Chinese government on the use of the Chinese state credit/debit card (UnionPay) to export cash for gambling and other purposes.  The abuse seemed to be pervasive in Macau, the Las Vegas of China, which has a somewhat independent economy (like Hong Kong). Reports say that Mainland gamblers would go to Macau, pretend to buy merchandise at local pawn shops with the card, then pretend to return it for a cash refund (minus the shop's commission).  That way they could bypass the card's limit on cash withdrawal.  If that loophole was suddenly closed, it seems possible that the gamblers switched en masse to bitcoin.  

A sudden jump in the price must be due to single person buying or selling a large amount of bitcoin in a short time interval.  If the above explanation is correct, those may be exceptionally wealthy people trying to move their money out, or perhaps clandestine money transmitters providing that service for many smaller clients.  Either way, the jumps seem to indicate that the price is determined by a relatively small number of players.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 500

And you're debating with an unrepenting troll  Undecided

He may well be - but I have to say that       a) stuff like this is good entertainment ( in a slightly bored and listless kind of way) on an early Saturday evening whilst I'm preparing a curry, and            
      b) I've got to agree with the troll in this particular case. I've been following this thread long enough to know that the only ones to have made real gains are holders. Calculated risk ? In a rigged market ?

BTW - my Dad was the only Heavyweight Champion of the World to receive the Noble Prize for Physics. Where does that put my argument, relative to yours ?


Anyhow, on with the curry.

As you were.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.
Hyperjacked, remember. The ignore button is your friend. Don't feed the Lambies. Wink
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC

This is why I've given up on lambie
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1126
It's all mathematics...!

And you're debating with an unrepenting troll  Undecided
*unrepentant
Not trolling.
Just pointing out that trading the current BTC market is not 'calculating risks for a living.' And it's only gambling in inasmuch as being the mark in a game of Three Card Monte is gambling.


Dude...your a comedy show.

Please don't address me again.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0

And you're debating with an unrepenting troll  Undecided
*unrepentant
Not trolling.
Just pointing out that trading the current BTC market is not 'calculating risks for a living.' And it's only gambling in inasmuch as being the mark in a game of Three Card Monte is gambling.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.
Quote
You seem to have a clue

I am a speculator just as we all are. If I had access to control a trust fund for a percentage commission, I would be a much happier speculator.

With that said, I am rooting for a massive $600 attempt and testing. The $500-$600 correction in the middle (towards the top) will be more violent than the one between $400-$500. Weak hands will show. Strong hands will be hitting like fight club.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 504
Bitcoin replaces central, not commercial, banks
[quote author=Yrpapyrtersplooz

>Who do you think controls the stock market ? Not the retail investors...they are just pawns in the game!
It's a cat and mouse game between regulators and people finding ways to circumvent regulations. Been going on forever, both sides have great arsenals.
What you're seeing in BTC markets is, all of a sudden, the regulations are removed. And every scheme from the turn of the past century is suddenly new & fresh again, nothing to stop it.

That said, the retail [I'm guessing you mean 'small-time, Joe Average' investor is always at a disadvantage. That's why real markets have notions like 'accredited investor,' to save Joe Sixpack from his own ignorant greed, from having his ass handed to him.
This, BTW, is also the reason behind regulations against Three Card Monte games -- your Saurian Overlords don't want you to go broke 'calculating risks for a living,' & ending up on Welfare Smiley
The Original HyperJacked...

Your debating with someone who has been around the stock market since the 1970's..
[/quote]

And you're debating with an unrepenting troll  Undecided
Jump to: