Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 19934. (Read 26607973 times)

legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
Good morning Bitcoinland.

Still over $400. Let's see if it holds until the next leg up.

Up $30 and down $10 ain't a bad day.

Day's just begun, Jimbo.

Depends on where you live

Pretty sure it's morning in Toronto. While Chinaman sleeps the white devil dumps.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
Good morning Bitcoinland.

Still over $400. Let's see if it holds until the next leg up.

Up $30 and down $10 ain't a bad day.

Day's just begun, Jimbo.

Depends on where you live

Edit: Ouch! I guess it doesn't.

Edit 2: @chesthing sry for bad joke. The premise is that you're posting on a forum and not PM. I know. It's shit.
legendary
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1000
Good morning Bitcoinland.

Still over $400. Let's see if it holds until the next leg up.

Up $30 and down $10 ain't a bad day.

Day's just begun, Jimbo.
legendary
Activity: 4200
Merit: 4887
You're never too old to think young.
Good morning Bitcoinland.

Still over $400. Let's see if it holds until the next leg up.

Up $30 and down $10 ain't a bad day.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Craig wants to start a bitcoin bank.  The opposite of what satoshi created bitcoin for.  This is why satoshi will never come out.  The police raided this guys house hours after it was said he might be SN.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
The Craig Wright thing doesn't add up. There's supposed to be a tx of 1.1m BTC. Where is it on the blockchain and why are Satoshi's coins still where they always were?

https://bitscan.com/articles/something-about-the-new-satoshi-isnt-wright

I'm trying to find another explanation and the only ones I can come up with are
1) Someone else has 1m BTC
2) The doc is fake

It seems sort of odd that Satoshi would have penned a defense of PayPal.

https://theconversation.com/are-anonymous-and-lulzsec-about-to-hack-paypal-for-wikileaks-2582

Idk
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007
Hide your women
The Craig Wright thing doesn't add up. There's supposed to be a tx of 1.1m BTC. Where is it on the blockchain and why are Satoshi's coins still where they always were?

https://bitscan.com/articles/something-about-the-new-satoshi-isnt-wright

I'm trying to find another explanation and the only ones I can come up with are
1) Someone else has 1m BTC
2) The doc is fake

Yeah, this reminds me of the fake Mormon will of Howard Hughes.  He knows he can't access the coins, but if he gets anyone to believe he can, he could pledge them for collateral to a loan.  This is really strange because Bitcoin is probably the easiest asset to prove you truly control. Just sign something with your private key. Frauds are so easily sniffed out with just the minimum amount of due diligence. You almost have to WANT to be fooled in order to get defrauded.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 348
Merit: 250
[...]

My impression is that Wright (may he or may he not be SN) wanted to be found.
clap clap good read butters

Snark aside, that line is, in my opinion, our take-home message so far.

By itself, it doesn't exclude the possibility that Wright is Satoshi, but it does add additional requirements on what counts as proof -- and what we've seen so far doesn't constitute that, imo.

Does he still have any github privileges? Maybe one of those fancy crypto-sig thingys?

If he takes the limelight and admits to being satoshi I'll want some confirmation in that direction.

If not, he either wants to be ignored or deserves to be ignored.

There's an alert function built into the Bitcoin core wallet for telling people about vital updates to the wallet. Alerts can only be made by signing them by a specific ECDSA key. Only a few people hold that key, and they include Satoshi Nakamoto, Gavin Andresen and theymos.

If Satoshi signed a message with that key, and both Gavin Andresen and theymos confirmed it wasn't them it would give confirmation  of who he is.


https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Alert_system


Quote
Alert message

Alerts are broadcast using the same TCP relay system as block and tx messages. They are not encoded in a special transaction. Unlike block and tx relaying, alerts are sent at the start of every new connection for as long as the alert is in effect. This ensures that everyone receives the alert.

Alerts contain this information:

How long to relay the alert.
How long to consider the alert valid.
An alert ID number.
A list of alerts that should be canceled upon receipt of this alert.
Exactly which versions of Bitcoin are affected by the alert. Unaffected versions still relay the alert for the benefit of older versions.
Alert priority.
The alert text.
Only alerts that are signed by a specific ECDSA public key are considered valid. The known private key holders are Satoshi Nakamoto, Gavin Andresen and theymos. There are other people able to issue alerts in the event of the incapacitation of the aforementioned.
sr. member
Activity: 439
Merit: 250
Hassan Al-Kebab
I placed my order around 320.
legendary
Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278
Signed keys or a fake.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
Thank you, it just gets complicated for me if i was to switch wallets.  I wasn't even able to just move blocks to my laptop from pc as it messed up so i'll wait.  So i could send the bitcoins and then it just wont update till whenever but the guy on the other side would get them immediately?

Thanks Smiley

That would work as long as there has been no spending on the addresses in question in the meantime.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031
The Craig Wright thing doesn't add up. There's supposed to be a tx of 1.1m BTC. Where is it on the blockchain and why are Satoshi's coins still where they always were?

https://bitscan.com/articles/something-about-the-new-satoshi-isnt-wright

I'm trying to find another explanation and the only ones I can come up with are
1) Someone else has 1m BTC
2) The doc is fake

possible offline transaction. just hand over the key.

In which case, they were never 'transferred' and no control has been given up. Or, if they were moved afterwards, slowly, then who owns the 1m unmoved coins?!
ImI
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
The Craig Wright thing doesn't add up. There's supposed to be a tx of 1.1m BTC. Where is it on the blockchain and why are Satoshi's coins still where they always were?

https://bitscan.com/articles/something-about-the-new-satoshi-isnt-wright

I'm trying to find another explanation and the only ones I can come up with are
1) Someone else has 1m BTC
2) The doc is fake

possible offline transaction. just hand over the key.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031
The Craig Wright thing doesn't add up. There's supposed to be a tx of 1.1m BTC. Where is it on the blockchain and why are Satoshi's coins still where they always were?

https://bitscan.com/articles/something-about-the-new-satoshi-isnt-wright

I'm trying to find another explanation and the only ones I can come up with are
1) Someone else has 1m BTC
2) The doc is fake
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 531
Crypto is King.
sr. member
Activity: 276
Merit: 250
Question: Could i sell my bitcoin in wallet while being 1 year behind?
How large is 1 year 20 weeks to download?

i would guess 8h
thanks, 30 mins later its down by 2 weeks Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 276
Merit: 250
Question: Could i sell my bitcoin in wallet while being 1 year behind?
How large is 1 year 20 weeks to download?

As long as you have the wallet and password, of course you could spend your money

It may take hours and days. If you don't want to wait, you may switch to a lite client such as Electrum
Thank you, it just gets complicated for me if i was to switch wallets.  I wasn't even able to just move blocks to my laptop from pc as it messed up so i'll wait.  So i could send the bitcoins and then it just wont update till whenever but the guy on the other side would get them immediately?

Thanks Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
[...]

My impression is that Wright (may he or may he not be SN) wanted to be found.
clap clap good read butters

Snark aside, that line is, in my opinion, our take-home message so far.

By itself, it doesn't exclude the possibility that Wright is Satoshi, but it does add additional requirements on what counts as proof -- and what we've seen so far doesn't constitute that, imo.

Does he still have any github privileges? Maybe one of those fancy crypto-sig thingys?

If he takes the limelight and admits to being satoshi I'll want some confirmation in that direction.

If not, he either wants to be ignored or deserves to be ignored.
Jump to: