Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 20098. (Read 26710193 times)

legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3948
Merit: 11416
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
Think it through again champ. Mark was missing 600k btc. Closed banking channels meant that no one could withdraw via wire transfer, but they could withdraw btc. He was buying real btc with fake and/or customer money to keep btc withdrawals working. This having a negative effect on exchange rate is ridiculous... until the scam came crashing down of course.

If Gox coins really were stolen, and the thief dumped coins for cash, then how is Karpeles pumping by buying a smaller amount of coins with customer funds to enable withdrawal?  It would be a wash or probably negative movement from him not buying as many as were stolen.  The only way Karpeles is pumping in that scenario is if the "thief" didn't sell any.  Who would steal $200 million dollars in goods and not sell any?

We have no idea really when the theft occurred, it could have happened as early as 2011. It could have been liquidated at much lower prices. One thing we know for sure, a criminal clever enough to waltz off with 100's of thousands of btc, would not be trying to sell them on mtgox in the late 2013 bubble when there was no way to get the fiat out.

People frequently will assert that Gox shenanigans caused the BTC market to go in one direction or another, yet neither is really clear and unambiguous.

In the end, it appears pretty clear that Gox did increasingly engage in a kind of fractional reserve banking of bitcoins to be trading coins that it did not in fact have in its possession.

So a bot created pumping is one thing to cause the price to go up, but a flooding of the market with non-existing coins, is another thing that causes the real price to go down....
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Think it through again champ. Mark was missing 600k btc. Closed banking channels meant that no one could withdraw via wire transfer, but they could withdraw btc. He was buying real btc with fake and/or customer money to keep btc withdrawals working. This having a negative effect on exchange rate is ridiculous... until the scam came crashing down of course.

If Gox coins really were stolen, and the thief dumped coins for cash, then how is Karpeles pumping by buying a smaller amount of coins with customer funds to enable withdrawal?  It would be a wash or probably negative movement from him not buying as many as were stolen.  The only way Karpeles is pumping in that scenario is if the "thief" didn't sell any.  Who would steal $200 million dollars in goods and not sell any?

We have no idea really when the theft occurred, it could have happened as early as 2011. It could have been liquidated at much lower prices. One thing we know for sure, a criminal clever enough to waltz off with 100's of thousands of btc, would not be trying to sell them on mtgox in the late 2013 bubble when there was no way to get the fiat out.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Think it through again champ. Mark was missing 600k btc. Closed banking channels meant that no one could withdraw via wire transfer, but they could withdraw btc. He was buying real btc with fake and/or customer money to keep btc withdrawals working. This having a negative effect on exchange rate is ridiculous... until the scam came crashing down of course.

If Gox coins really were stolen, and the thief dumped coins for cash, then how is Karpeles pumping by buying a smaller amount of coins with customer funds to enable withdrawal?  It would be a wash or probably negative movement from him not buying as many as were stolen.  The only way Karpeles is pumping in that scenario is if the "thief" didn't sell any.  Who would steal $200 million dollars in goods and not sell any?

One of the few pump situations is if Karpeles stole the coins himself, hid them, didn't spend any, then uses customer funds to fund withdrawal with the intent of letting the business collapse and run off with the hidden coins later.  Gox is a mystery to me because he was already making lots of money and doing something like that would be lots of risk for not much of a lifestyle improvement over what you already have.  He could already buy gold toilets.

There's also always the chance a govt entity shows up making threats or saying they'll set him up for prison time if he doesn't help them get control of the keys or implode the market.

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
Two years ago today when we crossed into 1k territory. Unfortunately, as we were later to find out, that was 1k GoxBux

Since nobody seems to know how many Bitcoins Gox actually had, it's still possible that instead of pumping, Gox might instead have had a negative effect on the market by selling more coins than they owned (shorting).  Yea, they're buying and selling with customer funds, but that doesn't mean they're pumping if they have 600k coins in liability on the books and only had 200k coins.  They would be naked shorting like Blythe Masters and silver.  I haven't really seen any good summary of Gox liabilities vs assets over time, but if there's always more liabilities than assets, they're naked shorting!

Think it through again champ. Mark was missing 600k btc. Closed banking channels meant that no one could withdraw via wire transfer, but they could withdraw btc. He was buying real btc with fake and/or customer money to keep btc withdrawals working. This having a negative effect on exchange rate is ridiculous... until the scam came crashing down of course.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
The big surge in volume is in the Chinese exchanges, especially Huobi and OKCoin.  

This is wrong.  Bitfinex was leading price the majority of the time in the rise.  This is not a China pump, China just also wants to go up.

Two years ago today when we crossed into 1k territory. Unfortunately, as we were later to find out, that was 1k GoxBux

Since nobody seems to know how many Bitcoins Gox actually had, it's still possible that instead of pumping, Gox might instead have had a negative effect on the market by selling more coins than they owned (shorting).  Yea, they're buying and selling with customer funds, but that doesn't mean they're pumping if they have 600k coins in liability on the books and only had 200k coins.  They would be naked shorting like Blythe Masters and silver.  I haven't really seen any good summary of Gox liabilities vs assets over time, but if there's always more liabilities than assets, they're doing internal naked shorts!

If Gox coins were actually stolen, and the thief dumped his coins while Gox is increasing sell side liquidity with coins they don't even have, then you have even more shorting!  In other words, nobody knows what the hell kind of influence Gox had on the market.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
price going to dump soon




It is happening already and I thought it would be soon the trading day for it to go down. Was $357 last I checked around ten minutes ago thought it broke 360 barely two hours ago. Up to $366 and down to almost $10 is not very promising end of the month tally.

 Cry
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
price going to dump soon




It is happening already and I thought it would be soon the trading day for it to go down. Was $357 last I checked around ten minutes ago thought it broke 360 barely two hours ago. Up to $366 and down to almost $10 is not very promising end of the month tally.


Yes, we are crashing uncontrollably. Except...we aren't.

Zoom out a little bit on your charts and stop trying to be cute with little moves. Look at the pattern, not the pattern within the pattern, within the pattern.
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
TRUMP IS DOING THE BEST! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
price going to dump soon




It is happening already and I thought it would be soon the trading day for it to go down. Was $357 last I checked around ten minutes ago thought it broke 360 barely two hours ago. Up to $366 and down to almost $10 is not very promising end of the month tally.
sr. member
Activity: 327
Merit: 250
Two years ago today when we crossed into 1k territory. Unfortunately, as we were later to find out, that was 1k GoxBux

I believe we're starting to see some more flakiness from the Gox server here returning old data. The cause of this was never really addressed but I have my suspicions that the Gox order book was almost entirely imaginary.



I remember Gox used to snottily claim it had its own custom wallet software, and didn't use the bog standard wallets everyone else used. Its statements gave the impression that flakiness from the Gox server was impossible due to its superior technology and genius developers. Considering it had its own superior custom wallet software it's funny how it lost 200k coins in an old "forgotten" wallet.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Never thought becoming a HODLER would be such a rewarding experience.

The 1 year chart looks incredible. I love it

Because you only lost $20/BTC since a year ago? I mean, sure, it's a helovalot less than you lost the year before, but still...


You can always adjust your time horizon to support your argument. I could also say it has gone up about 140% since its bottom in January.

As a HODLER and a believer in the Bitcoin ecosystem...I have continuously bought a couple coins here and there if and only if it brought my average down. This has proven to be a profitable strategy.

If the "bottom in January" was a year ago, you'd have am excellent point, and I'd be dead wrong. Wait til the middle of Jan. 2016, and, if BTC price is above 166, you get a fist bump Smiley

Sounds like a deal. I'm pretty confident we will be well above 166 in January, but you never know with Bitcoin. HODL only works if the price tends to rise in the long run.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
the network still seems to be doing okay -- although it likely will reach a point where it won't relatively soon.

economics is all about TANSTAAFL. So just let the free fee market do its magic.

ImI
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019

In memoriam of Willy.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2373
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
Two years ago today when we crossed into 1k territory. Unfortunately, as we were later to find out, that was 1k GoxBux

I believe we're starting to see some more flakiness from the Gox server here returning old data. The cause of this was never really addressed but I have my suspicions that the Gox order book was almost entirely imaginary.

legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Never thought becoming a HODLER would be such a rewarding experience.

The 1 year chart looks incredible. I love it

Because you only lost $20/BTC since a year ago? I mean, sure, it's a helovalot less than you lost the year before, but still...


You can always adjust your time horizon to support your argument. I could also say it has gone up about 140% since its bottom in January.

As a HODLER and a believer in the Bitcoin ecosystem...I have continuously bought a couple coins here and there if and only if it brought my average down. This has proven to be a profitable strategy.

sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
Never thought becoming a HODLER would be such a rewarding experience.

The 1 year chart looks incredible. I love it
legendary
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
TRUMP IS DOING THE BEST! MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!
Just broke through 360, a major psychological resistance. Now my only worry is that we'll overshoot the moon and end up on Jupiter.
$410 by next Wednesday. OMG, is that o-ring thingy leaking?

We keep breaking my psychological barrier again and again. There's a small chance I was a bit optimistic Sad
That barrier at 360 was tough one but if that holds then the way is paved in gold from here on in.
$400 should be the next hurdle to cross but I see why you say $410 because we have seen it almost get passed $500 to just touch and then fall face first in mere seconds to $495.
Jump to: