Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 2059. (Read 26619975 times)

I felt the responsibility to respond to OutOfMemory's graphic, as it seemed the most important part to him.
After that I added what I find the most important thing with regards to the topic.

I think trying to answer to aspects that are most important for your dialogue partner is necessary for a cordial conversation. Don't you think?

Oh?  Thanks for pointing out that portfolio management section of the article, and the various ways that the author (Tuur Demeester) outlines considering attempts to justify both risks and reasons for choosing bitcoin allocation levels.  He does really flesh out a lot of those kinds of considerations and also he leads off by fleshing out the investment thesis for bitcoin.. and largely proclaiming a stronger fuck shitcoins stance - even though he did not use those exact words, including that the investment thesis for bitcoin is getting stronger and stronger.. and surely unlike @bitebits summary - he did not not proclaim lump sum investing to be superior to the employment of a DCA strategy - though of course, he gives some rationale for each of those strategies and also pointing out that a combination of both may well be individually suitable... including describing some possible tradeoffs that may well come from a variety of levels of investment aggressiveness.....including higher levels of initial allocation than I am wiling to recommend with his up to 50% "early retirement" bet that tends to be more than what I would want to suggest on a general audience approach.. since I leave my own general audience starting out much broader, but still lower with a 1% to 25% range for starting considerations.. and surely he had pointed out that it is likely better that no matter which strategy(ies) that we might end up choosing to employ that we are keeping in mind bitcoin as valuable asset in the long term (and likely increasingly uncorrelated in the long run, even though in correlation and even liquidation risks in the short run.. that likely adds to bitcoin's ongoing likely inevitable short-term volatility).

Then why post it bro?

as I wrote "all that is totally not the point".  But of course feel free to focus solely on that part of my post and cut out the rest...

dyor and check your sources. I don't need to tell you the internet is like ...oh idk,  75 percent nonsense?
Having said that, there is also a huge swath of really good info out there. You just gotta sort the wheat from the chaff if you will.

Well REAL science is not fucked up and never has been. (emphasis on real)
going by its name?  ok, maybe it does with you. It makes no difference to me. But thats just me. You do you.

Oh man....Well I'm not gonna get into a climate debate on this here famous thread because I know it won't end well. And that's not what I do anyway. And I'm not an expert on the subject.
All I will tell you is the last place I go to research and get opinions on real science is bitcointalk.org. (Or most anything ftm, except bitcoin chit-chat). Hopefully you do the same ...nuff said.

Lots of volatility in the Bitcoin market this week. Seems like people are a bit at odds with each other over whether or not the market is going to continue rising. This is probably a good thing as too much bullishness usually leads to ugly corrections. The traders are having their moment the last week or two it seems. Lots of back and forth to profit from.

Yeah @OutOfMemory #HODLing 

Explanation

What is that?

A moonboot for ants?

In udder wurds, "where's dee feets?"


You are too logical.   

Snap out of it, vapourminer!!!!!



The real world no doesn't work like dat.

great movie....

Peter Kills Interview with Bobs - Office Space (1999)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_1lIFRdnhA

result:
https://youtu.be/zqjQDP9KX6E?t=58

How do a retard like me knows if the raw data, the synopses and the calculations are even correct.  Science is so fucked up nowadays.  
Going by its name this institute makes the impression of having a financial incentive to get a kind of climate hysteria going for its own funding.

But anyways, I actually don't even fear earth getting warmer.  It will cause CO2 to rise and this will increase plant life.  We had hotter temps 1000 years ago, at least in Europe.

But all that is totally not the point.  I think everyone is free to fear whatever he wants.  Be it Corona, Climate or whatever "crisis" or fear porn gets pushed onto society.

I just don't wanna join every time.  I don't have to take part in every "crisis" or whatever you wanna call it.  Life is short and I'm not going to waste it being constantly scared or worried about frightening future stories.

It's not good for your health.  And especially, if you have children, fear and worry is the last thing you should teach them.


But hey, anyone feel free to fear any "crisis"...   I will be watching what crisis is next on the program.  And if I need some thrill that time, I might join again for the next "current thing"...  

Explanation

Here's a better visualization of the data:

https://climatereanalyzer.org/clim/sst_daily/

Mouseover year/date and highlited lines.

Man made global warming? I don't know.
But certainly global warming, and it's gaining momentum.

#GN
#HODL
#30K

Explanation

Fuck all the crises. It's just a mainstream term, a label. I'm sick of it, too.
"Crisis" is implying that it's possible to solve the situation.
But this is something different. Look at the charts. You know how to read charts, don't you?


Sad to hear. I hope all goes well, bro.
I watched my dad slowly dying in an ICU (not Covid), i wouldn't want you to experience this, too.
Carpe diem.

EDIT: Would you sell if you had to (save your father's life)? Honest question. I think i would.
EDIT2: I wasn't asking to read an answer, but for asking this yourself.

Maybe he works in an office like this guy.

Explanation

Good lord!
Youie-pooie actually have a job on top of posting boatloads of text here??!
When do you ever sleep?