Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 21000. (Read 26630526 times)

hero member
Activity: 691
Merit: 500
Would absolutely love for the core dev team to get on-board with bigger blocks and I'm sure most other people would too. Now that their bluff has been called, maybe we'll see them implement something.
There is no need for bigger block size. There is no need to increase the size of blocks every time we get near the limit. There is no need for free money transfers for everyone. Everything that is free for the users but not free for the manufacturers will be abused in every possible way. That is a basic rule for every economy!!! Blockchain will be cluttered with spam and bitcoin will become worthless. Everyone should get accustomed to the idea that they have to compete with higher fees to get included in a block. XT altcoin gives no solution to this at all. It just kicks the can down the road in the most irresponsible way!

So want a bitcoin only for those rich enough to be able to get their tx's on the chain? How libertarian. Such altruism.

You are a perfect fit for the blockstream dream of a bitcoin solely accessible from a private sidechain. No direct access to the non-monied proletariat. I think that is a seismic shift from satoshis original plan. How do you reconcile that?

it's to early to decide a grow of the blocklimit. in the future the block reward will decrease and the fees have to increase. thats the vision of satoshi. but we have to handle it with calm.

What do you think will happen to the millions of lost bitcoins ?



You're wrong

https://blockchain.info/address/1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
it's to early to decide a grow of the blocklimit.

Right on.  Should wait until there's a catastrophic backlog, and then start thinking about what to do about it & trying to reach a consensus.

go ahead to increase the backlog.  Grin

https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/coinwallet-plans-stress-test-bitcoin-make-case-larger-block-size/
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 250
3200 BTC on Stamp to get through to get back to 250.

Just a little more consolidation in the 230s before an explosion higher once people realize the crash has happened so it's time to load back up.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Would absolutely love for the core dev team to get on-board with bigger blocks and I'm sure most other people would too. Now that their bluff has been called, maybe we'll see them implement something.
There is no need for bigger block size. There is no need to increase the size of blocks every time we get near the limit. There is no need for free money transfers for everyone. Everything that is free for the users but not free for the manufacturers will be abused in every possible way. That is a basic rule for every economy!!! Blockchain will be cluttered with spam and bitcoin will become worthless. Everyone should get accustomed to the idea that they have to compete with higher fees to get included in a block. XT altcoin gives no solution to this at all. It just kicks the can down the road in the most irresponsible way!

BitcoinBlockstream Edition AKA Bitcoin Core will have to rely on the lightening network of some sorts, which will

1) centralize massively
2) take away miners fee, so no incentive for miners

Eventual dead of BitcoinBlockstream Edition AKA Bitcoin Core

Dev's powered by Blockstream are the ones out for self enrichment, slowly killing Bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
Would absolutely love for the core dev team to get on-board with bigger blocks and I'm sure most other people would too. Now that their bluff has been called, maybe we'll see them implement something.
There is no need for bigger block size. There is no need to increase the size of blocks every time we get near the limit. There is no need for free money transfers for everyone. Everything that is free for the users but not free for the manufacturers will be abused in every possible way. That is a basic rule for every economy!!! Blockchain will be cluttered with spam and bitcoin will become worthless. Everyone should get accustomed to the idea that they have to compete with higher fees to get included in a block. XT altcoin gives no solution to this at all. It just kicks the can down the road in the most irresponsible way!

So want a bitcoin only for those rich enough to be able to get their tx's on the chain? How libertarian. Such altruism.

You are a perfect fit for the blockstream dream of a bitcoin solely accessible from a private sidechain. No direct access to the non-monied proletariat. I think that is a seismic shift from satoshis original plan. How do you reconcile that?

it's to early to decide a grow of the blocklimit. in the future the block reward will decrease and the fees have to increase. thats the vision of satoshi. but we have to handle it with calm.

What do you think will happen to the millions of lost bitcoins ?

hero member
Activity: 691
Merit: 500
Would absolutely love for the core dev team to get on-board with bigger blocks and I'm sure most other people would too. Now that their bluff has been called, maybe we'll see them implement something.
There is no need for bigger block size. There is no need to increase the size of blocks every time we get near the limit. There is no need for free money transfers for everyone. Everything that is free for the users but not free for the manufacturers will be abused in every possible way. That is a basic rule for every economy!!! Blockchain will be cluttered with spam and bitcoin will become worthless. Everyone should get accustomed to the idea that they have to compete with higher fees to get included in a block. XT altcoin gives no solution to this at all. It just kicks the can down the road in the most irresponsible way!

So want a bitcoin only for those rich enough to be able to get their tx's on the chain? How libertarian. Such altruism.

You are a perfect fit for the blockstream dream of a bitcoin solely accessible from a private sidechain. No direct access to the non-monied proletariat. I think that is a seismic shift from satoshis original plan. How do you reconcile that?

it's to early to decide a grow of the blocklimit. in the future the block reward will decrease and the fees have to increase. thats the vision of satoshi. but we have to handle it with calm.

What do you think will happen to the millions of lost bitcoins ?
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
Would absolutely love for the core dev team to get on-board with bigger blocks and I'm sure most other people would too. Now that their bluff has been called, maybe we'll see them implement something.
There is no need for bigger block size. There is no need to increase the size of blocks every time we get near the limit. There is no need for free money transfers for everyone. Everything that is free for the users but not free for the manufacturers will be abused in every possible way. That is a basic rule for every economy!!! Blockchain will be cluttered with spam and bitcoin will become worthless. Everyone should get accustomed to the idea that they have to compete with higher fees to get included in a block. XT altcoin gives no solution to this at all. It just kicks the can down the road in the most irresponsible way!

So want a bitcoin only for those rich enough to be able to get their tx's on the chain? How libertarian. Such altruism.

You are a perfect fit for the blockstream dream of a bitcoin solely accessible from a private sidechain. No direct access to the non-monied proletariat. I think that is a seismic shift from satoshis original plan. How do you reconcile that?

it's to early to decide a grow of the blocklimit. in the future the block reward will decrease and the fees have to increase. thats the vision of satoshi. but we have to handle it with calm.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Warning: Confrmed Gavinista
Would absolutely love for the core dev team to get on-board with bigger blocks and I'm sure most other people would too. Now that their bluff has been called, maybe we'll see them implement something.
There is no need for bigger block size. There is no need to increase the size of blocks every time we get near the limit. There is no need for free money transfers for everyone. Everything that is free for the users but not free for the manufacturers will be abused in every possible way. That is a basic rule for every economy!!! Blockchain will be cluttered with spam and bitcoin will become worthless. Everyone should get accustomed to the idea that they have to compete with higher fees to get included in a block. XT altcoin gives no solution to this at all. It just kicks the can down the road in the most irresponsible way!

So want a bitcoin only for those rich enough to be able to get their tx's on the chain? How libertarian. Such altruism.

You are a perfect fit for the blockstream dream of a bitcoin solely accessible from a private sidechain. No direct access to the non-monied proletariat. I think that is a seismic shift from satoshis original plan. How do you reconcile that?
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
the FUD is strong today
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
I ❤ www.LuckyB.it!
If something goes wrong, ALL YOUR MONEY COULD BE LOST.

The most general statement in the world and it applies to everything.

Money in a bank? If something goes wrong, ALL YOUR MONEY COULD BE LOST.
Money in Bitcoin? If something goes wrong, ALL YOUR MONEY COULD BE LOST.
Money in Gold? If something goes wrong, ALL YOUR MONEY COULD BE LOST.
Money in houses? If something goes wrong, ALL YOUR MONEY COULD BE LOST.

agree and....  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy%27s_law
legendary
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
Would absolutely love for the core dev team to get on-board with bigger blocks and I'm sure most other people would too. Now that their bluff has been called, maybe we'll see them implement something.
There is no need for bigger block size. There is no need to increase the size of blocks every time we get near the limit. There is no need for free money transfers for everyone. Everything that is free for the users but not free for the manufacturers will be abused in every possible way. That is a basic rule for every economy!!! Blockchain will be cluttered with spam and bitcoin will become worthless. Everyone should get accustomed to the idea that they have to compete with higher fees to get included in a block. XT altcoin gives no solution to this at all. It just kicks the can down the road in the most irresponsible way!

true and have my support.
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049
┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴
If something goes wrong, ALL YOUR MONEY COULD BE LOST.

The most general statement in the world and it applies to everything.

Money in a bank? If something goes wrong, ALL YOUR MONEY COULD BE LOST.
Money in Bitcoin? If something goes wrong, ALL YOUR MONEY COULD BE LOST.
Money in Gold? If something goes wrong, ALL YOUR MONEY COULD BE LOST.
Money in houses? If something goes wrong, ALL YOUR MONEY COULD BE LOST.
hero member
Activity: 691
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
Would absolutely love for the core dev team to get on-board with bigger blocks and I'm sure most other people would too. Now that their bluff has been called, maybe we'll see them implement something.
There is no need for bigger block size. There is no need to increase the size of blocks every time we get near the limit. There is no need for free money transfers for everyone. Everything that is free for the users but not free for the manufacturers will be abused in every possible way. That is a basic rule for every economy!!! Blockchain will be cluttered with spam and bitcoin will become worthless. Everyone should get accustomed to the idea that they have to compete with higher fees to get included in a block. XT altcoin gives no solution to this at all. It just kicks the can down the road in the most irresponsible way!
full member
Activity: 364
Merit: 102
I told you all since the start of 2014 that bitcoin was over. Nobody is interested in it anymore as an investment.. that means GAME OVER for all of you trying to make it rich. Sorry, but it just isn't going to happen. Here's why:

1. China is out. Their govt cracked down on it, which was a wake up call for investors around the world that bitcoin CAN be controlled by governments, and rather easily, at that.

2. There are no developers! There is a very small team of men working on the bitcoin project part time. And they hardly receive anything for their troubles. There's no accountability behind any of it and nobody to turn to when there are software issues and bugs uncovered. And this isn't just a new version of Windows which could have a bug like a sound driver issue. If something goes wrong, ALL YOUR MONEY COULD BE LOST. Nobody aside from maniacs is willing to take on those risks.

3. There is simply no momentum anymore. From 2009 until 2013, some interesting things were happening. Bitcoin went from nothing essentially, to something that was being talked about on the news, and even a few stores were willing to accept it. More stores followed, but very few actually accept bitcoins. They actually take them and instantly convert to cash, so it's a gimmick more than anything. Now many of these stores aren't accepting at all anymore, because nobody uses it!
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Warning: Confrmed Gavinista


log everyone's IPs, blacklist and block tor?

thank to let me know, I will never use XT and will always fight it

No.
Optional
No.

If used behind a proxy it doesn't do anything.

Seriously, though, if you are going to be a core crusader you might start by checking a few of the facts first.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 2267
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k

log everyone's IPs, blacklist and block tor?

thank to let me know, I will never use XT and will always fight it

Please take the time to educate yourself. That is almost a total misrepresentation of the facts.
Jump to: