Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 2200. (Read 26609024 times)

he got tired so he took a break.

What happened to buddy? Wheres the hourly post? Buddy? BUDDY!?  *hyperventilating*

I vaguely remember that you said you deleted that picture.
So I guess the only option to see it is hoping someone quoted it.
I wasn't able to find on your merited posts with merits>1.
But maybe I didn't dig it hard enough.

I believe that it is NOT very likely that we would be going up that fast.. but surely, you never really know.

Personally, I have my thoughts that it would be difficult to just go into "no man's land" without having some kind of a correction first, and I expect that "no man's land" is currently somewhere in the $55k to $92k price territory.. and sure perhaps the starting point for no man's territory could be a bit higher than $55k  - yet my point is that it seems that there are pretty decent odds for some kind of a decently and meaningful and perhaps somewhat time-consuming correction prior to getting into noman's land.

I hate for you not to be prepared.. and to be fucking around with various non-btc thingie-ma-jiggies... .. .. and yeah, of course, you have your reasons....

On the other hand, it may well be possible that we are just describing our various numbers including what is needed to be "prepared" differently, because if you have an investment portfolio that has a decent quantity in BTC.. even in the supra 25% levels (and you had already asserted that your BTC constitutes more than 60%, and I surely have my doubts given some of the other nonsense that you had been spouting), but whatever, various portfolio distributions (allocations) that are in the 25% plus territory should be sufficiently good for BTC prices to go up.. why does anyone need to have more?

On a personal level, I did suggest that my own BTC allocation is also more than 60% in BTC, which I had already admitted and outlined in the historical changes in allocations chart at the bottom of my June 2022 post, and surely each of us would be determining the extent to which we might be prepared for various changes in asset valuations (including the valuation of dee cornz compared with other assets that we might hold) based on aspects of our own history in terms of how we might have gotten to any allocation that we are "playing" and perhaps how much we might be tweaking around our various assets held in our investment portfolio rather than mostly just taking some positions and mostly just letting our positions and our approaches ride (perhaps within some kind of a systematic way of dealing with relative changes in values that might happen from time to time.. if we believe that the relative changes in values need to be addressed by some kind of change in our practices in some kind of an action-oriented way?  which I tend to limit the amount of my involvement.. but hey?  maybe I am doing this wrong?  hahahahaha).