Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 22324. (Read 26619966 times)

hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Warning: Confrmed Gavinista
begin on start side of the river with wolf, goat , and cabbage - go across the river with the goat , leaving the cabbage and wolf behind (wolf won't eat the cabbage) , leave the goat on the target side , go back to the beginning side of the river (leaving the goat on the target side) , bring the wolf back with you and leave it on the target side , bring the goat back with you to the beginning side (leaving the wolf on the target side) , then , leave the goat behind on the beginning side of the river and bring the cabbage with you to the target side of the river , come back with empty boat , leaving cabbage and wolf on the target side of the river , return to the beginning side of the river to retrieve the goat , and then return to the target side of the river with goat, cabbage , and wolf , all intact ... easy Smiley

Correct, but there's a shorter solution. Click here: http://brainden.com/crossing-river.htm there is a lot more where the riddle came from. Beautiful puzzles and - BTW: you're hired! Tongue

Smiley


Why do we bitcoiners over complicate everything?

First step is to slaughter both the wolf and the goat on the shore. Now, the order of carriage is of no relevence. Where in the original requirements did it state that the wolf and the goat had to be alive on the other side? Was he starting a japanese petting zoo?   Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Warning: Confrmed Gavinista
Looks like the majority have it regarding the poll.

Well below 270, and its 9am here in London.

lol

The high so far today on finex was 270.8

"Monday the 23rd price" is a bit ambiguous. I would interpret it as the average price of coins traded for USD during 23 March GMT.

"Well below 270" is less ambiguous. One could just check what coindesk puts as average price when the day is over.

Average for the 36hr day didnt get much better (was about 266). Is that still worth a LOL, or is it well below 270?
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1031
Here's another bit of deduction that's even vaguely on topic. This is why I think satoshi's coins will never move: https://bitscan.com/articles/satoshis-millions-gone-for-good
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
oooo sorry incorrect - cannot split into 6 and 6 - one of the people is lighter *OR* heavier , splitting 6 and 6 cannot reveal whether the heavy/light person is on either side ... Wink ... (the heavy side of 6 could reveal that those 3 vs 3 of them are equal on the 2nd weighing , and leave you with an inability to determine who's the odd duck out of the 6 who weren't on the heavy side of the 1st weighing) ... it's a tricky one ... 6v6 was my first inclination as well , but the key is 1 of 12 is lighter OR heavier ...

*haha i'd hire ya anyway you seem clever enough

*the answer involves first doing 4vs4 , then eliminating either 8 or 4 from the 1st weighing , next you switch up the teams a little bit , assuming the 8 are NOT eliminated , in order to eliminate a few more , eventually you get to 3 or 2 that can be weighed , of course if 8 are eliminated , then figuring out who's the odd duck out of 4 with 2 weighings isn't terrible difficult at all Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
Quote
oooo sorry incorrect - cannot split into 6 and 6 - one of the people is lighter *OR* heavier , splitting 6 and 6 cannot reveal whether the heavy/light person is on either side ... Wink ... (the heavy side of 6 could reveal that those 3 vs 3 of them are equal on the 2nd weighing , and leave you with an inability to determine who's the odd duck out of the 6 who weren't on the heavy side of the 1st weighing) ... it's a tricky one ... 6v6 was my first inclination as well , but the key is 1 of 12 is lighter OR heavier ...

In this case you will have to split the odds:

Heavier person case:
1. You split them in half (six persons per side)
2. Take the heaviest side and split them once more (3 persons per side)
3. Take the heaviest side and you end up with 3 persons.
4. Choose randomly the 2 of them and weight them.

If they're equal, you found the one outside. Otherwise the heavier one will be revealed by the balance.

Thinner person case:
Then you have to repeat the process for the case the person is thinner than the others.

1. You split them in half (six persons per side)
2. Take the lightest side and split them once more (3 persons per side)
3. Take the lightest side and you end up with 3 persons.
4. Choose randomly the 2 of them and weight them.

If they're equal, you found the one outside. Otherwise the thinner one will be revealed by the balance.

There is another way by dividing the weight of the persons you weighted and find if they're of the same weight every time, (ie: first time total weight/6, second time total weight/3 etc), but... I prefer simpler solutions Tongue

PS: It seems I missed the job then Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Took profits on yesterday's long trade off the nasdaq news. Waiting mode activated.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
oh and here's a fun one back for you all - was on brooklyn 99 last week or two - you've got 12 people on an island , 11 of which are the same weight , and only a balance beam to tell them apart , and you can only use the balance beam 3 times total to tell them apart - which one of the 12 people is the heavy or light one ?
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
haha yeah ... bonus points for being the first person to answer a logic problem whilst blotto ! ... if only being a genius would get me a job and not sitting in my pj's trading bitcoin all day ! ... though i guess in a way i've achieved total independence and self employment , i'm still underutilized as far as making a meaningful contribution to society given ability ... and making less than i'd like Wink
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
begin on start side of the river with wolf, goat , and cabbage - go across the river with the goat , leaving the cabbage and wolf behind (wolf won't eat the cabbage) , leave the goat on the target side , go back to the beginning side of the river (leaving the goat on the target side) , bring the wolf back with you and leave it on the target side , bring the goat back with you to the beginning side (leaving the wolf on the target side) , then , leave the goat behind on the beginning side of the river and bring the cabbage with you to the target side of the river , come back with empty boat , leaving cabbage and wolf on the target side of the river , return to the beginning side of the river to retrieve the goat , and then return to the target side of the river with goat, cabbage , and wolf , all intact ... easy Smiley

Correct, but there's a shorter solution. Click here: http://brainden.com/crossing-river.htm there is a lot more where the riddle came from. Beautiful puzzles and - BTW: you're hired! Tongue

Smiley


yeah just sortof banged that out without thinking (6 beers in) - i'm sure there's a step or two in the middle where you could double-up and increase efficiency - *i'm an expert level chess player (semi-professional) with a genius mind geared towards pattern recognition / math - puzzles = simple , though occasionally i take the long way around Tongue

I'm impressed! I'm nowhere near your level... Smiley BTW: It doesn't matter if you take the long road; since the destination is reached. It was a nice call from you (especially after 6 beers). I couldn't even read after a 6-pack!! Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
begin on start side of the river with wolf, goat , and cabbage - go across the river with the goat , leaving the cabbage and wolf behind (wolf won't eat the cabbage) , leave the goat on the target side , go back to the beginning side of the river (leaving the goat on the target side) , bring the wolf back with you and leave it on the target side , bring the goat back with you to the beginning side (leaving the wolf on the target side) , then , leave the goat behind on the beginning side of the river and bring the cabbage with you to the target side of the river , come back with empty boat , leaving cabbage and wolf on the target side of the river , return to the beginning side of the river to retrieve the goat , and then return to the target side of the river with goat, cabbage , and wolf , all intact ... easy Smiley

Correct, but there's a shorter solution. Click here: http://brainden.com/crossing-river.htm there is a lot more where the riddle came from. Beautiful puzzles and - BTW: you're hired! Tongue

Smiley


yeah just sortof banged that out without thinking (6 beers in) - i'm sure there's a step or two in the middle where you could double-up and increase efficiency - *i'm an expert level chess player (semi-professional) with a genius mind geared towards pattern recognition / math - puzzles = simple , though occasionally i take the long way around Tongue
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
begin on start side of the river with wolf, goat , and cabbage - go across the river with the goat , leaving the cabbage and wolf behind (wolf won't eat the cabbage) , leave the goat on the target side , go back to the beginning side of the river (leaving the goat on the target side) , bring the wolf back with you and leave it on the target side , bring the goat back with you to the beginning side (leaving the wolf on the target side) , then , leave the goat behind on the beginning side of the river and bring the cabbage with you to the target side of the river , come back with empty boat , leaving cabbage and wolf on the target side of the river , return to the beginning side of the river to retrieve the goat , and then return to the target side of the river with goat, cabbage , and wolf , all intact ... easy Smiley

Correct, but there's a shorter solution. Click here: http://brainden.com/crossing-river.htm there is a lot more where the riddle came from. Beautiful puzzles and - BTW: you're hired! Tongue

Smiley
POM
sr. member
Activity: 547
Merit: 254
Im optimistic about the NASDAQ news, i hope the rally to $300 is upon us soon Smiley
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
begin on start side of the river with wolf, goat , and cabbage - go across the river with the goat , leaving the cabbage and wolf behind (wolf won't eat the cabbage) , leave the goat on the target side , go back to the beginning side of the river (leaving the goat on the target side) , bring the wolf back with you and leave it on the target side , bring the goat back with you to the beginning side (leaving the wolf on the target side) , then , leave the goat behind on the beginning side of the river and bring the cabbage with you to the target side of the river , come back with empty boat , leaving cabbage and wolf on the target side of the river , return to the beginning side of the river to retrieve the goat , and then return to the target side of the river with goat, cabbage , and wolf , all intact ... easy Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
Quote
Nice gravure you got there btw. You have a nice hand. You drew it on 11.2013? I *think* I'm getting the point, (I may not, you don't think that I'm actually smart do you?) and I assume you tried to figure it out no? Smiley
Thanks. But that cartoon was not related to bitcoin, it was for lecture notes of a course on math for CS.  Posted it here just because of the "Greeks and logic" topic.

I figured out it wasn't bitcoin related, that's why I posted the (2) answers... Wink
Seriously; messing around with random data and trying to find the logic in between was something that always excited me. The rarest "human" ability nowadays (and the centuries before) is/was the combinational knowledge (ie: how do you make sense from -phenomenally- random data). I believe this should be a mandatory test in every HR department of EVERY ''high tech'' company (computer/medical/pharmaceutical etc).

You see, it's not enough to possess the information (ie: studies), you must also be able to solve the puzzle! Now I'm typing this, I remembered that the "social myth" says, there is a test that every employee should pass in order to get hired in certain companies in Japan.

Here it goes:  Smiley
Code:
A farmer returns from the market, where he bought a she-goat, a cabbage and a wolf (what a crazy market :-).
On the way home he must cross a river. His boat is small and won't fit more than one of his purchases.
He cannot leave the she-goat alone with the cabbage (because the she-goat would eat it), nor he can
leave the she-goat alone with the wolf (because the she-goat would be eaten).
How can the farmer get everything on the other side in this river crossing puzzle?
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1046
So sad to see this. They were acting so bullish after those "Nasdaq Technology" release news.

People were supposed to give a shit about this  Huh




sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
hmmm .. wait ... what ? ... stroked out there for a second ... pancakes ?
Jump to: