Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 22341. (Read 26610659 times)

legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_righting_reflex#Terminal_velocity

I suggest many of you should be open to learning new things. I might be proven wrong, but for now my provided link clearly states:
- cats do not land on their feet after falling from great height.
- real data (~130 cats from NY) is available on falling cats and mortality/injury rate.
- height > 7 stories does increase survival rate based on data

"In a 1987 study, published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, of 132 cats that were brought into the New York Animal Medical Center after having fallen from buildings, it was found that the injuries per cat increased depending on the height fallen up to seven stories, but decreased above seven stories.[8] The study authors speculated that after falling five stories the cats reached terminal velocity and thereafter relaxed and spread their bodies to increase drag."

I'll probably be lurking again after this one. The forums have gone pretty rotten the last couple of years.

yeah... this is correct... but it is only correct up to a certain height, there is a sweet spot, and anything over that, and the cat gets it.

so go up to the 102 floor of the empire state building and throw the cat off, then it dies.. there is nothing that can stop the mass of the cats head from hitting the ground.

"Terminal velocity" is the maximum velocity of a body as it falls through air.   Mathematically, the velocity at ground increases with the starting height, but beyond a certain height the increase is negligible.

The article says that (1) the terminal velocity for a cat is 100 km/h and (2) that velocity is pretty much attained when falling from 5-6 stories.  One of these must be wrong, since a cat falling from 18 meters (6 generous stories) in vacuum would hit the ground at ~70 km/h only.

I would go with 8-10 stories.

hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cat_righting_reflex#Terminal_velocity

I suggest many of you should be open to learning new things. I might be proven wrong, but for now my provided link clearly states:
- cats do not land on their feet after falling from great height.
- real data (~130 cats from NY) is available on falling cats and mortality/injury rate.
- height > 7 stories does increase survival rate based on data

"In a 1987 study, published in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, of 132 cats that were brought into the New York Animal Medical Center after having fallen from buildings, it was found that the injuries per cat increased depending on the height fallen up to seven stories, but decreased above seven stories.[8] The study authors speculated that after falling five stories the cats reached terminal velocity and thereafter relaxed and spread their bodies to increase drag."

I'll probably be lurking again after this one. The forums have gone pretty rotten the last couple of years.

yeah... this is correct... but it is only correct up to a certain height, there is a sweet spot, and anything over that, and the cat gets it.

so go up to the 102 floor of the empire state building and throw the cat off, then it dies.. there is nothing that can stop the mass of the cats head from hitting the ground.

"Terminal velocity" is the maximum velocity of a body as it falls through air.   Mathematically, the velocity at ground increases with the starting height, but beyond a certain height the increase is negligible.

The article says that (1) the terminal velocity for a cat is 100 km/h and (2) that velocity is pretty much attained when falling from 5-6 stories.  One of these must be wrong, since a cat falling from 18 meters (6 generous stories) in vacuum would hit the ground at ~70 km/h only.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
Shame we can't ban his IP..
Aren't you libertarian bitcoiners against censorship?

Nobody is insulting anybody here. Nobody is breaking the rules of the forum.


Censorship? Really? Cheesy



This isn't about insults or censorship.

This is about creating endless sockpuppet accounts to spam FUD, which I believe is against forum rules.

http://i664.photobucket.com/albums/vv10/JimboToronto/Spam-Can1.jpghttp://i664.photobucket.com/albums/vv10/JimboToronto/fud3.jpg
Who decides what is "spam FUD" and what is not? You? Cheesy
What about the endless "to the moon! buy!" posts before crashes? should those be considered "SPAM FUD" too?

Creating a new account breaks the rules of the forum?

You are not making sense  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 737
Merit: 500
Add another dollar or two, just to prove wrong the majority of the poll voters  Grin
legendary
Activity: 4200
Merit: 4887
You're never too old to think young.
Shame we can't ban his IP..
Aren't you libertarian bitcoiners against censorship?

Nobody is insulting anybody here. Nobody is breaking the rules of the forum.


Censorship? Really? Cheesy



This isn't about insults or censorship.

This is about creating endless sockpuppet accounts to spam FUD, which I believe is against forum rules.

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
If mods really gave a shit they would ban his other accounts and reinstitute newbie jail. The tone would improve immediately.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
Shame we can't ban his IP..

Bitcoiners don't know how to work computers is why Sad

The sock accounts are annoying.
They should just unban his/her NLC account & be done with it.

Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, and strength, and honour, and glory, and blessing.
hero member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 597
The level of this thread was always very low, but today it has reached a new all time low. Even me, a so called troll is feeling embarrassed for other peoples statements here.

Gn8 bear and bulltrolls.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
The trolls are out in force today
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Checking my post history?!  Op sec in this place is pretty tight.  Right on!

You registered within two days of NLC..who you clearly are.

Edit: Ignored. Just in case you try and respond.

You aren't paranoid at all, no sirree!
Come on, even Jimbo, World's Smartest Bitcoiner, gave him them me a pass Angry
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
we may as well keep that ignore finger sharpened.
You are still too slow.
legendary
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3015
Welt Am Draht
I assume its posts makes someone in command of this joint want to move their cock around with increasing excitement, so we may as well keep that ignore finger sharpened.
legendary
Activity: 3556
Merit: 9709
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
The sock accounts are annoying.



They should just unban his/her NLC account & be done with it.
hero member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 597
Shame we can't ban his IP..

Oh, looks like the bitcoinish liberalism has strong boundaries.

Will you also beg for a government intervention if the price falls below your pain threshold?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
[old people shit]

You only read what you like to read?
...

Don't argue with Jimbo now, not when he's all fucked up on Cialis the way he is.
D00d's pretty core, boots that shit right into his spine--uses one of them bigass 50cc rigs with a bent point... then greases himself up with bacon lard & hangs in preteen chatrooms.  That's how he nailed that chick NLC.
Best to just let him alone.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
Lol good grief, this trolling activity is not very healthy. I'm starting to think this individual needs to be committed to a mental facility.

Shall we host an intervention, and by intervention I mean smack the nutter around the head with a large salmon.
Bitcoiners are starting to get violent.

Na that was comedy, not violence... violence looks a lot different than a slap around the head with a fish.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
Checking my post history?!  Op sec in this place is pretty tight.  Right on!

You registered within two days of NLC..who you clearly are.

Edit: Ignored. Just in case you try and respond.

I can confirm its nlc.  This account was aimed back at Ken Slaugheter as well back in the actm days.

All his sock accounts he used to troll ken with are now in this thread
newbie
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
Shame we can't ban his IP..
Aren't you libertarian bitcoiners against censorship?

Nobody is insulting anybody here. Nobody is breaking the rules of the forum.


Censorship? Really? Cheesy

legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1001
Lol good grief, this trolling activity is not very healthy. I'm starting to think this individual needs to be committed to a mental facility.

Shall we host an intervention, and by intervention I mean smack the nutter around the head with a large salmon.
At this point, I think it's a lost cause. This mental patient needs to be on heavy doses of medication for some time to come, perhaps permanently. I mean, this isn't normal behavior. You get your main account closed down and then you start a half dozen others, bizarre.
Jump to: