Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 22635. (Read 26706892 times)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
Hm... time to close the longs and take a really nice profit from 247$?  Grin

once we hit 310-320 we might only retrace to like 295 before going to 32,000$ per bitcoin, hope realize what you're doing by selling now.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa ... that's as close to singing as i can type ... was neat to see that 400k buy ... guess somebody thinks 300+ is near (and wants to make 10 grand while it does) ...
Why the heck are you singing Coldplay?
lmao
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa ... that's as close to singing as i can type ... was neat to see that 400k buy ... guess somebody thinks 300+ is near (and wants to make 10 grand while it does) ...
Why the heck are you singing Coldplay?
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
I told myself I would stop believing in the power of shorts covering to fuel more upside when the BTC swaps at finex hit 16K. No reason for that number except that they have bottomed out around that level so far in 2015. Doesn't mean much, of course more short may want to cover.

Going to wait and see how it shakes out before getting long again on a dip. May have left a couple dollars on the table, but what the hell, you're supposed to sell strength right?
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting

go ahead

I am surely taking profits now...

nothing to complain about

...and opened s amall short, just for the fun of it
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa la la la la laaaaaaa ... that's as close to singing as i can type ... was neat to see that 400k buy ... guess somebody thinks 300+ is near (and wants to make 10 grand while it does) ...
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
legendary
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1037
going to $ 300 and more nice..
ImI
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting

go ahead

I am surely taking profits now...

nothing to complain about
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting

go ahead

I am surely taking profits now...
sr. member
Activity: 361
Merit: 250
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting

Spoke to soon

I said start to... did not say that this is the top
ImI
legendary
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting

go ahead
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
Can a person that calls state a "stationary bandit" be dreaming of a state?
I'll start with the brief version: the sentiment communicated in the sentence I have marked with bold is illogical. It either means that you are an anarchist (left or right, one is dumber, both are illogical), or a liberal (don't start with faux inventive american term: libertarian) who can't grasp that the state plays a vital role in protecting those liberal rights, or you are someone who is anti-politics with strong political opinions.

Do you need more? Have I misunderstood something?
This one would do, thanks. However, I cannot see problem with logic. Person that calls the state "stationary bandit" obviously doesn't like the state. Right? While "dreaming of a ... state" means that the person likes some form of state. Right? So the bolded sentence can be translated to: "if I say that I don't like state, why you are making conclusion that I like state?". IMO, this is logical and reasonable question. While your conclusion is not logical. Your move Smiley

My claim was that based on my experience with you I cannot assume that there is a logical consistency behind what you are saying. What I was trying to show in the last post was why. Either you got lost trying to figure out what logic is, or you don't want to share with me which one of the three types of illogical political leanings you have. Or maybe there is a fourth that I haven't thought of. No moves, just curious.
So you are not using logic because you think that I don't use it either. And you think that I don't use logic because I don't share your political views. OK. Thanks for the discussion, it was really enlightening. Smiley

qe?

That was the weirdest cop out I've seen in a while.

Well, the best of luck to you!
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
Futures not keeping up though.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting

Spoke to soon
full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
buying volumes are declining. Over bought territory. I believe it is time for bulls to take profit and bears to start shorting

Yep, declining alright. Declining so much that I just saw a 1700 BTC green candle pop up.

legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
Holy Guacamole!!! $293 on finex
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
hero member
Activity: 569
Merit: 505
Jump to: