TL;DR: You got nothing. You make up "facts," and, when called on it, retort with "don't seem to be arguing in good faith."
Why not warn people about our uppity negro Obama letting filthy wetbacks put money in the same banks where white folks keep theirs? Or is aztecminer doing a good job? Why not warn them about 9/11 too, just to be an all-in-one libertard cliche? Oh wait, BitChick's financial adviser from the nuthouse, rptiela or whatever his name, already got that covered. Okay then, everything seems to be in order...
Have I missed anything ugaise?
I have a friend who is the CEO of a local bank and we were talking over Christmas Dinner about it. He complained that his FDIC premiums went up even though it's a very conservative bank with high lending standards but he was getting effectively punished because of misbehavior by other banks. The bank had to pay for the premiums by either taking it out of their profit margin or by increasing fees such as NSF charges.
Wait, you expect me to feel sorry for you friend, the bank CEO, rly? Because his profits are down & he might take out his rage on his account holders? Do you realize how insane that is?
What next, should I feel sorry for serial killers when prices of ammo go up? Because they might get angry & shittier than they already are, thus doing more damage to mankind?
You are poisoning the well by lumping in real problems with conspiracy theories that I have never even mentioned and are completely irrelevant anyway. That's what I mean by arguing in bad faith.
No, I'm pointing out that a typical libertard is a delightful grab bag of paranoia, and that crazy comes here to lay eggs.
Inb4: "Ad hominem!!!1!" Yes, exactly that. I don't give the same credence to the economic assertions of paranoid schizophrenics as to those of folks who don't claim to be "a little tea pot, short and stout." Call me crazy.
P.S. My friend, who is the CEO of the world, tells me things are going glowingly. Checkmate
