Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 24021. (Read 26632641 times)
December 15, 2014, 10:39:33 PM
ripple fucks bitcoin, that's what's happening here imo.
December 15, 2014, 10:36:27 PM
this really doesn't look good.
Always darkest before the dawn.
Yeah this is either the last shakeout or last chance to jump ship for a while...
I guess no one really knows until we break either way
this could be a really good entry point, but it doesn't feeeeel right, feels like we could get a really good panic in the next 24 hours...
the next 24hour are really un-fucking-believably critical!!!
December 15, 2014, 10:34:06 PM
I dont understand this argument
daily volume is nothing...a handful of altcoins have more volume than XRP
poloniex is just a small exchange for ripple
have a look. ripple does 3 mio a day. thats enough to hurt bitcoin. it sucks liquidity out of bitcoin.
nobody really cared about ripple but as it stands it could get a real threat imo.
http://coinmarketcap.com/
December 15, 2014, 10:31:54 PM
It's the only type of people I've known to use the term. If what I said offends you, perhaps the shoe fits more than you'd care to admit?
Offend me? You wish you could. All I'm feeling right now is a mild sense of amusement.
If an observation that many women tend to carry way to much shit around in handbags is enough to get you going, I think I which of us needs to be contemplating thinness of skin.
When you said this, I was like "wait what the fuck, handbags? WTF is this guy talking about there was no mention of handbags in that article" and NOW I realize that you were responding to ANOTHER post, when I had ASSUMED you were responding to the post (and link) directly above your original comment. EDIT: I thought you were saying "I disagree with this person, must have been a woman" and in reality you were talking about handbags.
Well golly gee don't I have egg on my face? I shall leave my previous posts for my own maximum embarrassment (unless you'd prefer I delete them since I am coming at you pretty hard in them, for what now appears to be no fucking reason).
In short: My bad, I apologize.
Are you going to go so far as to apologize to me too? Or NOT?
December 15, 2014, 10:29:56 PM
I dont understand this argument
daily volume is nothing...a handful of altcoins have more volume than XRP
December 15, 2014, 10:29:14 PM
When you said this, I was like "wait what the fuck, handbags? WTF is this guy talking about there was no mention of handbags in that article" and NOW I realize that you were responding to ANOTHER post, when I had ASSUMED you were responding to the post (and link) directly above your original comment. EDIT: I thought you were saying "I disagree with this person, must have been a woman" and in reality you were talking about handbags.
Well golly gee don't I have egg on my face? I shall leave my previous posts for my own maximum embarrassment (unless you'd prefer I delete them since I am coming at you pretty hard in them, for what now appears to be no fucking reason).
In short: My bad, I apologize.
It's all good. But I don't remember enough about the context to correct you or not on what I was replying to. It was more about the article itself though where the author (who was a woman) was talking about streamlining stuff. Which men typically do anyway (Though I have known women who do and men who don't so there is some stereotyping I admit). Though it is interesting that she picked on messenger bags (which many men eschew) when the more typical and more gender-normal-acceptable version would be the backpack which serves much the same purpose but is viewed in a different light. But it's late and I'm waffling so I'll shut up now.
Don't worry, I looked back, corrected myself, and it's all good.
If you're curious, it appears you were replying to a post quoting someone talking about putting away the handbags and messenger bags (not exact wording, and I think they were themselves quoting the opening to an article) from two pages before your post, and by complete coincidence your reply happened to be right under a link to an entirely different article that does not at all mention handbags.
December 15, 2014, 10:27:49 PM
December 15, 2014, 10:24:28 PM
this really doesn't look good.
Always darkest before the dawn.
Yeah this is either the last shakeout or last chance to jump ship for a while...
I guess no one really knows until we break either way
December 15, 2014, 10:23:30 PM
this really doesn't look good.
Always darkest before the dawn.
December 15, 2014, 10:22:27 PM
December 15, 2014, 10:17:53 PM
this really doesn't look good.
Always darkest before the dawn.
December 15, 2014, 10:15:00 PM
When you said this, I was like "wait what the fuck, handbags? WTF is this guy talking about there was no mention of handbags in that article" and NOW I realize that you were responding to ANOTHER post, when I had ASSUMED you were responding to the post (and link) directly above your original comment. EDIT: I thought you were saying "I disagree with this person, must have been a woman" and in reality you were talking about handbags.
Well golly gee don't I have egg on my face? I shall leave my previous posts for my own maximum embarrassment (unless you'd prefer I delete them since I am coming at you pretty hard in them, for what now appears to be no fucking reason).
In short: My bad, I apologize.
It's all good. But I don't remember enough about the context to correct you or not on what I was replying to. It was more about the article itself though where the author (who was a woman) was talking about streamlining stuff. Which men typically do anyway (Though I have known women who do and men who don't so there is some stereotyping I admit). Though it is interesting that she picked on messenger bags (which many men eschew) when the more typical and more gender-normal-acceptable version would be the backpack which serves much the same purpose but is viewed in a different light. But it's late and I'm waffling so I'll shut up now.
December 15, 2014, 10:14:25 PM
this really doesn't look good.
December 15, 2014, 10:12:30 PM
Does China look strong or is that just me?
edit: the walls
BFX is in panic mode however
edit: the walls
BFX is in panic mode however
If that 340 wall on stamp gets broken, things might finally get interesting.
December 15, 2014, 10:09:42 PM
Is it that time again???
December 15, 2014, 10:05:15 PM
Ouch.
December 15, 2014, 10:00:39 PM
December 15, 2014, 09:57:05 PM
Does China look strong or is that just me?
edit: the walls
BFX is in panic mode however
edit: the walls
BFX is in panic mode however
December 15, 2014, 09:57:01 PM
It's the only type of people I've known to use the term. If what I said offends you, perhaps the shoe fits more than you'd care to admit?
Offend me? You wish you could. All I'm feeling right now is a mild sense of amusement.
If an observation that many women tend to carry way to much shit around in handbags is enough to get you going, I think I which of us needs to be contemplating thinness of skin.
When you said this, I was like "wait what the fuck, handbags? WTF is this guy talking about there was no mention of handbags in that article" and NOW I realize that you were responding to ANOTHER post, when I had ASSUMED you were responding to the post (and link) directly above your original comment. EDIT: I thought you were saying "I disagree with this person, must have been a woman" and in reality you were talking about handbags.
Well golly gee don't I have egg on my face? I shall leave my previous posts for my own maximum embarrassment (unless you'd prefer I delete them since I am coming at you pretty hard in them, for what now appears to be no fucking reason).
In short: My bad, I apologize.
December 15, 2014, 09:55:59 PM
Shes really dumping now
Jump to: