sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
No it isn't...
"soon" is an estimate of time.
2300 > soon
He said 2300 (greater than) some time in the near future.
His explination of 2300 > x. does not work because soon is not a unit of measurement for bitcoin price.
soon is not unit, so therefore there is no way a greater than symbol can be used here.
He meant to say < 2300 soon.
Regardless, the price was 2308. So making such a massive prediction hardly makes him the Oracle of Delphi!
) 
