Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 24326. (Read 26715882 times)
November 25, 2014, 05:56:34 PM
something wrong with the data feed from stamp
November 25, 2014, 05:55:33 PM
why the charts are so weird last days?
November 25, 2014, 05:49:54 PM
...
Finally 1 person that understands
Finally 1 person that understands
Quick, sell him your coin before he smartens up!!1! Greater fools don't grow on trees you know.
...or do they?
November 25, 2014, 05:48:28 PM
sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
As stated by Albert Einstein "You can't measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree."
"2300" and "soon" are not comparable.
It doesn't matter. Language is not pure logic. 90%+ of language isn't. (for joniv "90%+" = not more than 90% but 10% LOL)
You can't understand 2300> soon in another way like "soon will be less than 2300".
Why?
Because of place of number and meaning of > <
Jonoiv is kid or he's stupid or he acts like he is wiser than everyone or he's stupid high kid acting wise man
November 25, 2014, 05:43:47 PM
sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
As stated by Albert Einstein "You can't measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree."
"2300" and "soon" are not comparable.
Thank You!
Finally 1 person that understands
November 25, 2014, 05:42:47 PM
Well I'm happy that on the other side of exchanges there're people with another kind of math
Another rule of that ppl is probably buy high sell low...
Another rule of that ppl is probably buy high sell low...
November 25, 2014, 05:42:08 PM
sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
As stated by Albert Einstein "You can't measure a fish by it's ability to climb a tree."
"2300" and "soon" are not comparable.
November 25, 2014, 05:40:55 PM
Well I'm happy that on the other side of exchanges there're people with another kind of math
Another rule of that ppl is probably buy high sell low...
Another rule of that ppl is probably buy high sell low...
November 25, 2014, 05:40:43 PM
sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
No it isn't...
"soon" is an estimate of time.
2300 > soon
He said 2300 (greater than) some time in the near future.
His explination of 2300 > x. does not work because soon is not a unit of measurement for bitcoin price.
soon is not unit, so therefore there is no way a greater than symbol can be used here.
He meant to say < 2300 soon.
Regardless, the price was 2308. So making such a massive prediction hardly makes him the Oracle of Delphi!
November 25, 2014, 05:33:30 PM
sorry to troll the wall thread with this but let's put this to bed.
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
he said "2300 > soon"
This is an (albeit inelegant) way of saying that soon the price will be less than 2300.
The phrasing is weird I agree, however it is correct (the logic, not the prediction, I actually don't think we'll go much lower than right now).
You seem to disagree with his using > instead of <.
If he had said 2300 < soon then.....ahhh I give up, I think I'm being trolled
November 25, 2014, 05:26:26 PM
November 25, 2014, 05:24:14 PM
November 25, 2014, 05:21:24 PM
jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.
> Greater than
< Less than
Problem?
Yes, someone has already explained that he used the correct symbol :S
He was trying to say the price will drop. and used the > greater than symbol
he said
2300 > (greater than) soon.
tell me how that means the price will be less than 2300?
No.. exactly!
He could have said
Price sub 2300 soon.
or
< 2300 incoming.
November 25, 2014, 05:19:03 PM
jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.
> Greater than
< Less than
Problem?
Yes, someone has already explained that he used the correct symbol :S
November 25, 2014, 05:17:02 PM
jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.
> Greater than
< Less than
Problem?
November 25, 2014, 05:14:23 PM
...
The sign you used is > (greater than)
...
The sign you used is > (greater than)
...
Not the "PANTS!" sign?
November 25, 2014, 05:11:04 PM
Buahahahahaa
2300>x means that x will be less than 2300.
Do MATH kid
Back to ignore forever, bye bye blackbird
2300>x means that x will be less than 2300.
Do MATH kid
Back to ignore forever, bye bye blackbird
No it doesn't it means:
2300 > soon
2300 (greater than) in a short amount of time.
What you meant to say was...
< 2300 soon.
What you actually said doesn't make any sense.
I really hope you are shorting, and you learn the hard way.
At times like this I wish there was a downvote button.
November 25, 2014, 05:09:31 PM
jonoiv you just failed so hard. wow.
November 25, 2014, 05:02:40 PM
Buahahahahaa
2300>x means that x will be less than 2300.
Do MATH kid
Back to ignore forever, bye bye blackbird
2300>x means that x will be less than 2300.
Do MATH kid
Back to ignore forever, bye bye blackbird
No it doesn't it means:
2300 > soon
2300 (greater than) in a short amount of time.
What you meant to say was...
< 2300 soon.
What you actually said doesn't make any sense.
I really hope you are shorting, and you learn the hard way.
November 25, 2014, 05:01:22 PM
I like silence in thread when btc is dropping. And I hate silly buzz when it's going up.
2300> soon
@jonoiv welcome to ignore
2300> soon
@jonoiv welcome to ignore
And the page jubilee noise was like having a bulldozer working outside all night.
Jump to: