...How is Gloria Jean Porter?
P.S: If she bought Bitcoin, she's like this:
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 24825. (Read 26713010 times)
October 29, 2014, 03:31:04 PM
P.S: If she bought Bitcoin, she's like this:
October 29, 2014, 03:27:13 PM
...
>makes an account just to make posts about me
A bit creepy, but hey, I don't judge. Get yourself checked, tho.
How is Gloria Jean Porter?
October 29, 2014, 03:24:13 PM
...
>makes an account just to make posts about me
A bit creepy, but hey, I don't judge. Get yourself checked, tho.
October 29, 2014, 03:23:44 PM
- what is this thing, and
- how do we stop it from reproducing
October 29, 2014, 03:22:20 PM
I see trolls (95%) with agendas.
October 29, 2014, 03:15:30 PM
I feel so much pain here.
October 29, 2014, 03:13:40 PM
>Because people buy, hold, and speculate in Bitcoin (this thread) to save kittens. 
Also babies, puppies, and rainbows. Now you are starting to get it. If you want to know how, you'll have to ask, but I'm sure you are not interested in the motives of others.Are you being intentionally daffy, or did your mind finally snap due to devastating (and, frankly, predictable and therefore embarrassingly avoidable) financial losses?
Lambenstein before his pink unicorn transformation?
https://i.imgur.com/v9scPMh.jpg
Refresh your hangings. I mean all of them.
October 29, 2014, 03:09:29 PM
I believe that last point is a bit much, and merely seems to be playing into concepts that BTC is a ponzi scheme, which you should realize by now that it is NOT a ponzi scheme, even though you want to continue to project theories and to see data that are in support of those kinds of ideas and the spreading of those kinds of frameworks.
Once again, YOU are saying "BTC is a ponzi scheme", not me.
Those entrepreneurs obviously have substantial interest in making people believe that bitcoin has a bright future and is going "to the moon" any time now. They are selling their funds, services, and bitcoins; and no one expects salesmen to provide unbiased evaluations or sponsor impartial data gathering and publication. That is all.
It should be noted also that no one should expect a balanced view of the market/Bitcoin from people who define their identity on Bitcoin being a failure either. Someone who claims they have no stake in the game, and is skeptical of Bitcoin (to the point of having it included in every post) should be viewed in the same light you are projecting on the these "salesmen". That is all.
+1
Jorge tries to position himself above the fray with his bullshit claims of academia... and supposed objectivity. October 29, 2014, 03:05:05 PM
BTC is an pyramid scheme, not an ponzi scheme.
I think you are full of shit in your attempt to draw subtle distinctions that remain inaccurate; however, what's the difference in your "esteemed" estimation? Or are you just throwing out a bunch of claims without any basis in reality in an attempt to inaccurately categorize bitcoin into what it is NOT?
October 29, 2014, 03:02:02 PM
I believe that last point is a bit much, and merely seems to be playing into concepts that BTC is a ponzi scheme, which you should realize by now that it is NOT a ponzi scheme, even though you want to continue to project theories and to see data that are in support of those kinds of ideas and the spreading of those kinds of frameworks.
Once again, YOU are saying "BTC is a ponzi scheme", not me.
Those entrepreneurs obviously have substantial interest in making people believe that bitcoin has a bright future and is going "to the moon" any time now. They are selling their funds, services, and bitcoins; and no one expects salesmen to provide unbiased evaluations or sponsor impartial data gathering and publication. That is all.
In both this response, and your reference to my previous response, you suggest that I am characterizing bitcoin or the motives of bitcoin players. Neither of which is accurate. You should realize, as a supposedly sophisticated and supposedly educated person, that I am characterizing your statements and the inferences of your statements and the apparent motives of your statements. It is possible that my characterization of your statements is inaccurate, and in that regard it remains inaccurate to attribute to me what you are seeming to be saying and/or asserting and/or your motivations for such characterizations.
There's NOTHING that is really bearish about the data contained in your first two links above, and your last point seems to be near total pie in the sky speculation with NO real world evidence to support the point that you seem to be attempting to outline (as if bitcoin is kind of dying away... hehehehe.. yeah, right...)
YOU are saying "bitcoin is kind of dying away", not me.
But, indeed, there is NO real world evidence about bitcoin usage. Those plots do not show such growth, and we have no idea of what that blockchain traffic really is. That is all of my point.
But, if you care to know, I also believe that the bitcoin entrepreneurs like Andreessen, Sielbert, Draper, Matonis etc. (and the bitcoin "news" sites that they support, like Coindesk) have no interest in such data becoming available, because they know that it would be depressing and bad for their sales. Just like they want people to believe that China is irrelevant.
October 29, 2014, 03:01:56 PM
Not sure you can say that, the same formation happened before and was followed by more down.
Also, the circumstances were different than what they are now...
October 29, 2014, 03:00:33 PM
October 29, 2014, 02:52:14 PM
>Because people buy, hold, and speculate in Bitcoin (this thread) to save kittens.
Also babies, puppies, and rainbows. Now you are starting to get it. If you want to know how, you'll have to ask, but I'm sure you are not interested in the motives of others.Are you being intentionally daffy, or did your mind finally snap due to devastating (and, frankly, predictable and therefore embarrassingly avoidable) financial losses?
In case it's not obvious: I'm not laughing at you because of your untempered greed. Many here would argue that greed is good. But mix in some ineptitude, and you got lols. Add some ignorance, pompous posturing and paranoia? Perfect!
Pure comedy gold!
October 29, 2014, 02:46:54 PM
lmao that's fucked up
Another crazy mofo, not that extreme tho:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKuZzR2FknI
Masonna = big love
Saw him live.
October 29, 2014, 02:43:01 PM
October 29, 2014, 02:41:09 PM
^ My friend's comment about drone/industrial: "Spent thousands on this stuff. Should'a just gone down to the basement and listened to my furnace." <==true story
(last OT post)
(last OT post)
pffffff,
My last comment: "You´re not true if you don´t own multiple copies of the whole Merzbow discography!"
http://www.discogs.com/artist/12551-Merzbow
Edit:
or Agathocles
http://www.discogs.com/search/?q=agathocles
What about Gerogerigegege?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPGTuidwxm4
LOL
Nothing wrong with them, i own at least one 7" and a tape from them, haven´t listened to it for about ~ 10 years though.
Short lo-fi noise attacks got a bit too stressful for me nowadays.
Edit:
Best Japan-Noise livegig ever:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxJUbd66Vcc
"Hanatarash was notorious for its dangerous live shows. Some of the band's most infamous shows included Eye cutting a dead cat in half with a machete, strapping a circular saw to his back and almost cutting his leg off, and destroying part of a venue with a backhoe bulldozer by driving it through the back wall and onto the stage.[2]
At a 1985 show in Tokyo's Superloft, the audience was required to fill out waivers due to the possibility of harm caused by the show. The show was stopped due to Eye preparing to throw a lit molotov cocktail onto the stage. The performance cost ¥600,000 (approximately $9,000 US) in repairs.[3]"
lolol
Another crazy mofo, not that extreme tho:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bKuZzR2FknI
October 29, 2014, 02:31:53 PM
If a troll is ranked 0-10 in terms of how many people he successfully baits/how frequently he baits them, Lambchop has to be at least 8/10.
you guys really need to stop quoting him!
October 29, 2014, 02:21:24 PM
^ My friend's comment about drone/industrial: "Spent thousands on this stuff. Should'a just gone down to the basement and listened to my furnace." <==true story
(last OT post)
(last OT post)
pffffff,
My last comment: "You´re not true if you don´t own multiple copies of the whole Merzbow discography!"
http://www.discogs.com/artist/12551-Merzbow
Edit:
or Agathocles
http://www.discogs.com/search/?q=agathocles
What about Gerogerigegege?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPGTuidwxm4
LOL
Nothing wrong with them, i own at least one 7" and a tape from them, haven´t listened to it for about ~ 10 years though.
Short lo-fi noise attacks got a bit too stressful for me nowadays.
Edit:
Best Japan-Noise livegig ever:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rxJUbd66Vcc
"Hanatarash was notorious for its dangerous live shows. Some of the band's most infamous shows included Eye cutting a dead cat in half with a machete, strapping a circular saw to his back and almost cutting his leg off, and destroying part of a venue with a backhoe bulldozer by driving it through the back wall and onto the stage.[2]
At a 1985 show in Tokyo's Superloft, the audience was required to fill out waivers due to the possibility of harm caused by the show. The show was stopped due to Eye preparing to throw a lit molotov cocktail onto the stage. The performance cost ¥600,000 (approximately $9,000 US) in repairs.[3]"
lolol
October 29, 2014, 02:16:55 PM
>Because people buy, hold, and speculate in Bitcoin (this thread) to save kittens.
Also babies, puppies, and rainbows. Now you are starting to get it. If you want to know how, you'll have to ask, but I'm sure you are not interested in the motives of others.Are you being intentionally daffy, or did your mind finally snap due to devastating (and, frankly, predictable and therefore embarrassingly avoidable) financial losses?
October 29, 2014, 02:16:19 PM
Where are the green dildos of yore?
Jump to: