Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 25003. (Read 26710675 times)

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
Looking to buy again next day or two. 3day MACD kept barely negative by the obvious selling yesterday. This weekend could be exciting. We may dip lower, or instead take out 4xx again and stairstep higher. If we go below 350 for any length of time I will just buy immediately. At this stage I am assuming we have bottomed at 275, with some pretty monumental support visible there. I suspect we have a few weeks at most before surging higher on high volume, leaving bears scratching their heads and remembering that little heard word on here, fundamentals.

"We are about to go up" Inca - every day.

Are you and pork chop the troll double act?
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
...But Marc Andreesen has made a lot of good calls in the past. You on the other hand..? Smiley

I wouldn't be surprised if i wake up and its over 400 tomorrow morning Wink
...just like the day before
Off to bed. Probably be over 400 when I wake, eh Shroomskit? Nn porkchop

It's 373, inca, it's 373



Try answering my last post. The short term price movements are irrelevant to me.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
Looking to buy again next day or two. 3day MACD kept barely negative by the obvious selling yesterday. This weekend could be exciting. We may dip lower, or instead take out 4xx again and stairstep higher. If we go below 350 for any length of time I will just buy immediately. At this stage I am assuming we have bottomed at 275, with some pretty monumental support visible there. I suspect we have a few weeks at most before surging higher on high volume, leaving bears scratching their heads and remembering that little heard word on here, fundamentals.

"We are about to go up" Inca - every day.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
...But Marc Andreesen has made a lot of good calls in the past. You on the other hand..? Smiley

I wouldn't be surprised if i wake up and its over 400 tomorrow morning Wink
...just like the day before
Off to bed. Probably be over 400 when I wake, eh Shroomskit? Nn porkchop

It's 373, inca, it's 373

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
Why Marc Andreessen is Long on Bitcoin and Short on Apple Pay

http://www.coindesk.com/marc-andreessen-long-bitcoin-short-apple-pay/

TL;DR: “I think it will be in the form of bitcoin, but, even if it’s not bitcoin, it will be something else."  Lol.

By "something else" he means something different from todays system, not something other than Bitcoin. Wink

No need to make fun...

Err, yes, he means something different, but not necessarily Bitcoin.  Here's the context (emphasis mine):
Quote
Rounding off the talk, Andreessen declared his confidence in the concept of cryptocurrency and the likelihood that it would become “vitally important”.

He concluded:

“I think it will be in the form of bitcoin, but, even if it’s not bitcoin, it will be something else. Even if it’s not this year, it will be five years or 10 years. It will happen, and it will be a very big deal. From that standpoint I both do care what happens in the short term, since we have to live in the short term, but I also have tremendous faith in what’s going to happen in the long run.”

 
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
Why Marc Andreessen is Long on Bitcoin and Short on Apple Pay

http://www.coindesk.com/marc-andreessen-long-bitcoin-short-apple-pay/

TL;DR: “I think it will be in the form of bitcoin, but, even if it’s not bitcoin, it will be something else."  Lol.

Not really the TLDR.

He is massively bullish on btc. Try watching the video rather than selecting a quote out of context.

We all need to make independent choices. But Marc Andreesen has made a lot of good calls in the past. You on the other hand..? Smiley
hero member
Activity: 1276
Merit: 622
Why Marc Andreessen is Long on Bitcoin and Short on Apple Pay

http://www.coindesk.com/marc-andreessen-long-bitcoin-short-apple-pay/

TL;DR: “I think it will be in the form of bitcoin, but, even if it’s not bitcoin, it will be something else."  Lol.

By "something else" he means something different from todays system, not something other than Bitcoin. Wink

No need to make fun...
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
Why Marc Andreessen is Long on Bitcoin and Short on Apple Pay

http://www.coindesk.com/marc-andreessen-long-bitcoin-short-apple-pay/

TL;DR: “I think it will be in the form of bitcoin, but, even if it’s not bitcoin, it will be something else."  Lol.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
legendary
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
BTW Bitstamp doesn't allow unverified accounts to trade at all, simply you cant trade you cant deposit and you cant withdraw before verifying, and if you had an account before the verification was required it just get blocked until you do so.
Am I the only one who thinks that this is fishy as hell?
Feel like Stamp is pulling a Mt. Gox soon.

maybe you think that they sell customers coin and now they try to block withdrawal as long as possible while they try again with their price manipulation to buy cheap coin Huh
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
Oh, I'm not disagreeing with you.  Just the bit where Gox failed because of bad coding.
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
BTW Bitstamp doesn't allow unverified accounts to trade at all, simply you cant trade you cant deposit and you cant withdraw before verifying, and if you had an account before the verification was required it just get blocked until you do so.
Am I the only one who thinks that this is fishy as hell?
Feel like Stamp is pulling a Mt. Gox soon.

You're saying that just because they don't wanna get in trouble with governments/banks, they have a coder whose completely incompetent?

Very interesting assumptions. You might wanna visit a therapist though


We all agree then--Gox honestly lost money due to bad coding; nothing shady happened.
Correct?

Valid point, and I also am of the opinion that Karpeles is chillin somewhere sunny with champagne on a $10 million boat
But it makes little to no sense how criminals would be allowed to launder money with no trouble just because they had an account BEFORE the verification was required as Thomas-s seem to imply as "not fishy". That, if anything would be fishy to me.
If you don't have a verified account, you shouldn't be allowed to deposit and withdraw. clean and clear

That said, I am about to move out of bitstamp with my funds too, after having more then 20 btc on there for over a year
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 254
BTW Bitstamp doesn't allow unverified accounts to trade at all, simply you cant trade you cant deposit and you cant withdraw before verifying, and if you had an account before the verification was required it just get blocked until you do so.
Am I the only one who thinks that this is fishy as hell?
Feel like Stamp is pulling a Mt. Gox soon.

You're saying that just because they don't wanna get in trouble with governments/banks, they have a coder whose completely incompetent?

Very interesting assumptions. You might wanna visit a therapist though


We all agree then--Gox honestly lost money due to bad coding; nothing shady happened.
Correct?
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 500
Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Network
BTW Bitstamp doesn't allow unverified accounts to trade at all, simply you cant trade you cant deposit and you cant withdraw before verifying, and if you had an account before the verification was required it just get blocked until you do so.
Am I the only one who thinks that this is fishy as hell?
Feel like Stamp is pulling a Mt. Gox soon.

You're saying that just because they don't wanna get in trouble with governments/banks, they have a coder whose completely incompetent?

Very interesting assumptions. You might wanna visit a therapist though

Alright, let's see what happens in the next few months.
hero member
Activity: 1276
Merit: 622
BTW Bitstamp doesn't allow unverified accounts to trade at all, simply you cant trade you cant deposit and you cant withdraw before verifying, and if you had an account before the verification was required it just get blocked until you do so.
Am I the only one who thinks that this is fishy as hell?
Feel like Stamp is pulling a Mt. Gox soon.

Yes, you're the only one. The rest of us are fine with verification. Take your money laundering elsewhere...
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
BTW Bitstamp doesn't allow unverified accounts to trade at all, simply you cant trade you cant deposit and you cant withdraw before verifying, and if you had an account before the verification was required it just get blocked until you do so.
Am I the only one who thinks that this is fishy as hell?
Feel like Stamp is pulling a Mt. Gox soon.

You're saying that just because they don't wanna get in trouble with governments/banks, they have a coder whose completely incompetent?

Very interesting assumptions. You might wanna visit a therapist though
member
Activity: 105
Merit: 13
BTW Bitstamp doesn't allow unverified accounts to trade at all, simply you cant trade you cant deposit and you cant withdraw before verifying, and if you had an account before the verification was required it just get blocked until you do so.
Am I the only one who thinks that this is fishy as hell?
Feel like Stamp is pulling a Mt. Gox soon.


Whats wrong with verification? Verify your account and you are ready to go.
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 500
Proof-of-Stake Blockchain Network
BTW Bitstamp doesn't allow unverified accounts to trade at all, simply you cant trade you cant deposit and you cant withdraw before verifying, and if you had an account before the verification was required it just get blocked until you do so.
Am I the only one who thinks that this is fishy as hell?
Feel like Stamp is pulling a Mt. Gox soon.
Jump to: