So if i understand your claims correctly, you are suggesting that either older users are engaging in ongoing coin movement to disguise the bitcoin days destroyed quantity that is generated by their coin movements (to make the bitcoin days destroyed number smaller) or they are transferring access to their accounts/wallets without moving coins?
Correct me if I have misstated your claims, but if the above are your claims: 1) it seems to be a bit cumbersome to engage in such conduct to camouflage coin movements and therefore does NOT seem to be very plausible explanations and 2) if the conduct is happening, would there be any solution(s) to make such movement of coins more transparent?
you assume that my post points to manipulation or something of that kind, but you missed my point which is: simply denying the claim of "there is no spike on the days destroyed chart, therefore early adopters are not selling"
I don't think I missed your point. I just think the evidence remains weak, even though i believe I understand the point you are making and the evidence to which you are pointing in order to make your point.
I don't have any pre-set belief in which I am purposefully fighting with the evidence, I just am NOT convinced based on what I see to arrive at a similar conclusion at which you are arriving.
at the top of the next bubble.
. 
