Only people with coins can dump
Nope, i just took a dump
Ha. True.
In other news we can expect the bears to start posting something, anything to encourage others to sell
Not sure wtf these guys are talking about..
If you're one of the bulltards, then you should just click that logout button and come back when btc is worth $10k...
Can't understand why these guys argue with people who trade everyday.. LOL
I doubt this thread is ONLY useful or inviting to day traders. Sounds a bit over the top.
Also the fact that you refer to people who are bullish about BTC as "bulltards" demonstrates that you are lacking in some perspective regarding how you refer to people who may have a different perspective from you.
Even people who are bullish about the price direction of BTC may want to monitor this thread because they may want to continue to buy on dips and attempt to predict when those BTC price dips are going to occur based on ongoing market movements, news, TAs, FUD spreading, etc.
So, where did I say that those bullish about btc are bulltards? Stop making stories..
For me, bulltards are those who attack people when they say something like btc is going down and they think that the price should just shoot straight up.
And bullish are people who believe in bitcoin;s future and they aren't affected by these dumps .
Why call anyone "bulltards"? Makes little sense to me, because NO matter what the term is inaccurate, even if you attempt to define who is in such a camp and who is NOT... .. .. but whatever, you feel it is helpful to categorize some posters as bulltards, then I suppose that is your choice.
Why call them bulltards? Because they behave like retarded bulls.
I searched what a "bulltard" is and here's what I found:
-a bull tard is person who is both retarded* and extremely aggressive. Often possesses "tard strength." This person would rather fight you than talk it out; would rather use violence than intellect
-An idiot who thinks that stock markets always rise.
From that, I could say, my own definition of "bulltard" is not far from what others think what a bulltard is.
I don't even understand why you're being affected with my post
I am just responding to your perceived need to Name-call. I don't see it as necessary, except maybe under rare circumstances.
Sometimes I have been accused of name calling; however, I deny employing such tactics because I usually, instead, describe the idiocy of the behavior that I witness rather than calling names... Anyhow, it may be merely a personal choice regarding the extent to which you think that it is fruitful to engage in calling people "bulltards," even if you believe that their conduct rises to the level to meet such definition...
Like i said, in the end, it is your choice regarding how you want to communicate in a public thread (even if you happen to be posting under a pseudo-anonymous name, which a large majority of us are).
So who among us started name-calling? Why didn't you react when he said "bear"?
From his post "expect the bears to start posting something, anything to encourage others to sell", I could clearly say he's one of the "bulltards". And I could feel the sarcasm in his post.
A normal person who uses his brain would usually ask the poster "why" he think the price would go down.
And a bulltard would just call people a "bear" and most would resort to personal attacks.
I suppose name calling is all a matter of degree, and it is almost as bad to call someone a bull as it is to call them a bulltard, but of course the term bulltard is more derogatory... that should be obvious.. .. and the higher the level of derrogatory-ness may cause more attention.. and of course, each of us may NOT closely read every post.. especially if the post is NOT initially directed towards us....
A similar problem in my thinking would be to call someone a bear or a beartard, both are bad, but calling someone a beartard would be more derogatory..which also should seem obvious... and unnecessary.. no? except maybe rare circumstances...
I would think that it would be better to criticize someone's view by describing their actions or the subject of their posts or to suggest that they cannot see the facts correctly because they are scewed by bearish or bullish preconceptions..
Anyhow, frequently, in my humble bumble opinion, there are better ways to criticize poster for their ideas or the scewed nature of their ideas rather than to getting into name calling. or categorizing people... sometimes I may refer to some poster as a bot.. which I suppose is a bit derrogatory, but many times it is said in jest... I suppose a poster could be a bot-tard, and maybe that could be funny too, if it is NOT over used... or used as a distraction from their ideas... truly there are some ideas that are circulated in this thread that seem to be somewhat devoid of meaning.. and are robotic in nature.. and other ideas are fleshed out more thoroughly...
