Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 26067. (Read 26628902 times)

legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
 

On the Winklevi... we have a few talking heads who have said their opinion and thrown in words like "the preponderance of the law." SEC provides much less latitude when an investment is not limited to sophisticated, wealthy, or experienced investors. See Purina case. The ETF will be limited in large part to such investors, but these activities will touch on the investments of less sophisticated investors. I could go into a multitude of cases, but it would just be attacked by FUD. So, let me just say that Securities Regulation was my best and favorite class, my prof was the former SEC enforcement head, and I just don't see the s--- happening. I may very well be wrong. I figure that's what stop-losses are for.

Well, I am glad that you have studied into some of what you perceive to be relevant precedent, and based upon that you have come to what you believe is an informed prediction.

I believe that is what we all do.  We act upon what information that we have and we assign probabilities to it, and if we are exposed to new information, then maybe we will change our probability assignments.


By the way, when you suggest that people who are bullish about BTC are in the habit of using FUD, you are largely mischaracterizing what seems to go on around here.  Frequently, downward price manipulators are in the practice of spreading FUD or partial information or incomplete information  in order to talk down BTC and to talk down its potential and to talk down its risk.. NOT all bears do this, but that is largely where you see the FUD.  

On the other side (the bullish inclinations), you may see exuberance, but most of the time these bullish inclined people are NOT in the habit of purposefully spreading misinformation about BTC.








In the long-term, people get burnt or change their mind. There is also a much more pervasive screwing of traders now that Wall Street has entered the game. Finally, the deals being attached through the mainstream, uber-regulated, above board side of the market are just f---ing lame. 10% off on Dell products? Really? I could do better than that without even trying on Amazon and heaven forbid I did try I could probably get 50% off sticker on Dell products. So, really, I don't see that working out too hot. You can count all the wallets you want or use the word adoption in every sentence, but lame is lame.

It seems that you are over emphasizing trivial matters here.  The importance about dell and other large liquidation opportunities is just that, the ability to liquidate in a variety of ways and the fact that more and more larger venders are incorporating BTC payments into their offerings.







For the average, everyday user Bitcoin just becomes a tax hassle with at least a feeling of less security (although I don't really think that is all that true at all) where the value of your funds are ever in the hands of a non-politically accountable Junta of insiders (like with the U.S. dollar, but to a higher degree because Wall Street is historically filled with scumbags) and your balance could be effectively zeroed out upon implementation of bans the next time a terrorist acts a fool or the government starts to worry it might replace state backed currencies. Also, knowing all of those hassles, or even suspecting them, it takes a truly virtuous soul to give it a chance (and they'll end up being f---ed over by one of these bucket shop exchanges). So yes, I said f---ing disaster because, frankly, this s--- is going to be worth $5 comes 2020, and maybe even sooner, unless we turn back towards the dark markets.

Which is why OpenBazaar, to me, is really tremendous news.

O.k. now, I can kind of see where you are coming from with the term "disaster," yet I still get the sense that you are being overly pessimistic.  

I do tend to agree with you; however, there are going to need to be continuing and ongoing darkmarket type BTC developments in order to assist with some of the potential problems of either financial market manipulations and/ or governmental manipulations of the BTC space.

it looks like JayJuanGee is trying to "talk up" BTC

I should change my name to RRRRRRRRRRRRRiiiiiiisssssing   or maybe to NOT_fallllllllllllling
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
 

On the Winklevi... we have a few talking heads who have said their opinion and thrown in words like "the preponderance of the law." SEC provides much less latitude when an investment is not limited to sophisticated, wealthy, or experienced investors. See Purina case. The ETF will be limited in large part to such investors, but these activities will touch on the investments of less sophisticated investors. I could go into a multitude of cases, but it would just be attacked by FUD. So, let me just say that Securities Regulation was my best and favorite class, my prof was the former SEC enforcement head, and I just don't see the s--- happening. I may very well be wrong. I figure that's what stop-losses are for.

Well, I am glad that you have studied into some of what you perceive to be relevant precedent, and based upon that you have come to what you believe is an informed prediction.

I believe that is what we all do.  We act upon what information that we have and we assign probabilities to it, and if we are exposed to new information, then maybe we will change our probability assignments.


By the way, when you suggest that people who are bullish about BTC are in the habit of using FUD, you are largely mischaracterizing what seems to go on around here.  Frequently, downward price manipulators are in the practice of spreading FUD or partial information or incomplete information  in order to talk down BTC and to talk down its potential and to talk down its risk.. NOT all bears do this, but that is largely where you see the FUD.  

On the other side (the bullish inclinations), you may see exuberance, but most of the time these bullish inclined people are NOT in the habit of purposefully spreading misinformation about BTC.








In the long-term, people get burnt or change their mind. There is also a much more pervasive screwing of traders now that Wall Street has entered the game. Finally, the deals being attached through the mainstream, uber-regulated, above board side of the market are just f---ing lame. 10% off on Dell products? Really? I could do better than that without even trying on Amazon and heaven forbid I did try I could probably get 50% off sticker on Dell products. So, really, I don't see that working out too hot. You can count all the wallets you want or use the word adoption in every sentence, but lame is lame.

It seems that you are over emphasizing trivial matters here.  The importance about dell and other large liquidation opportunities is just that, the ability to liquidate in a variety of ways and the fact that more and more larger venders are incorporating BTC payments into their offerings.







For the average, everyday user Bitcoin just becomes a tax hassle with at least a feeling of less security (although I don't really think that is all that true at all) where the value of your funds are ever in the hands of a non-politically accountable Junta of insiders (like with the U.S. dollar, but to a higher degree because Wall Street is historically filled with scumbags) and your balance could be effectively zeroed out upon implementation of bans the next time a terrorist acts a fool or the government starts to worry it might replace state backed currencies. Also, knowing all of those hassles, or even suspecting them, it takes a truly virtuous soul to give it a chance (and they'll end up being f---ed over by one of these bucket shop exchanges). So yes, I said f---ing disaster because, frankly, this s--- is going to be worth $5 comes 2020, and maybe even sooner, unless we turn back towards the dark markets.

Which is why OpenBazaar, to me, is really tremendous news.

O.k. now, I can kind of see where you are coming from with the term "disaster," yet I still get the sense that you are being overly pessimistic.  

I do tend to agree with you; however, there are going to need to be continuing and ongoing darkmarket type BTC developments in order to assist with some of the potential problems of either financial market manipulations and/ or governmental manipulations of the BTC space.

it looks like JayJuanGee is trying to "talk up" BTC
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
 

On the Winklevi... we have a few talking heads who have said their opinion and thrown in words like "the preponderance of the law." SEC provides much less latitude when an investment is not limited to sophisticated, wealthy, or experienced investors. See Purina case. The ETF will be limited in large part to such investors, but these activities will touch on the investments of less sophisticated investors. I could go into a multitude of cases, but it would just be attacked by FUD. So, let me just say that Securities Regulation was my best and favorite class, my prof was the former SEC enforcement head, and I just don't see the s--- happening. I may very well be wrong. I figure that's what stop-losses are for.

Well, I am glad that you have studied into some of what you perceive to be relevant precedent, and based upon that you have come to what you believe is an informed prediction.

I believe that is what we all do.  We act upon what information that we have and we assign probabilities to it, and if we are exposed to new information, then maybe we will change our probability assignments.


By the way, when you suggest that people who are bullish about BTC are in the habit of using FUD, you are largely mischaracterizing what seems to go on around here.  Frequently, downward price manipulators are in the practice of spreading FUD or partial information or incomplete information  in order to talk down BTC and to talk down its potential and to talk down its risk.. NOT all bears do this, but that is largely where you see the FUD. 

On the other side (the bullish inclinations), you may see exuberance, but most of the time these bullish inclined people are NOT in the habit of purposefully spreading misinformation about BTC.








In the long-term, people get burnt or change their mind. There is also a much more pervasive screwing of traders now that Wall Street has entered the game. Finally, the deals being attached through the mainstream, uber-regulated, above board side of the market are just f---ing lame. 10% off on Dell products? Really? I could do better than that without even trying on Amazon and heaven forbid I did try I could probably get 50% off sticker on Dell products. So, really, I don't see that working out too hot. You can count all the wallets you want or use the word adoption in every sentence, but lame is lame.

It seems that you are over emphasizing trivial matters here.  The importance about dell and other large liquidation opportunities is just that, the ability to liquidate in a variety of ways and the fact that more and more larger venders are incorporating BTC payments into their offerings.







For the average, everyday user Bitcoin just becomes a tax hassle with at least a feeling of less security (although I don't really think that is all that true at all) where the value of your funds are ever in the hands of a non-politically accountable Junta of insiders (like with the U.S. dollar, but to a higher degree because Wall Street is historically filled with scumbags) and your balance could be effectively zeroed out upon implementation of bans the next time a terrorist acts a fool or the government starts to worry it might replace state backed currencies. Also, knowing all of those hassles, or even suspecting them, it takes a truly virtuous soul to give it a chance (and they'll end up being f---ed over by one of these bucket shop exchanges). So yes, I said f---ing disaster because, frankly, this s--- is going to be worth $5 comes 2020, and maybe even sooner, unless we turn back towards the dark markets.

Which is why OpenBazaar, to me, is really tremendous news.

O.k. now, I can kind of see where you are coming from with the term "disaster," yet I still get the sense that you are being overly pessimistic. 

I do tend to agree with you; however, there are going to need to be continuing and ongoing darkmarket type BTC developments in order to assist with some of the potential problems of either financial market manipulations and/ or governmental manipulations of the BTC space.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Momentum hasn't picked up too heavily yet, but I suspect it might. We kept pounding on that 3100/500 level until it gave in. I think when we bounce next, it may become a strong resistance. We'll see, but it looks like there is more down incoming. Undecided

told ya, you have to face bitcoin's downfall sooner or later
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
WOOOT sub 500

i just come back from a Fuckin wedding man , lOl no joke CraZy Partuy!!!
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
Momentum hasn't picked up too heavily yet, but I suspect it might. We kept pounding on that 3100/500 level until it gave in. I think when we bounce next, it may become a strong resistance. We'll see, but it looks like there is more down incoming. Undecided
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100

OpenBazaar will be like a Silk Road that no one can shut down.


I thought that silk road was already like a silk road that could NOT be shut down.

This is more P2P as opposed to centralized through a market hub. The architecture is a little more thoughtful. It should hold strong.

o.k. b/c I though that silk road was already using p2p and Thor and all that jazz.. 

I am a little confused about some of the technical anonymizing capabilities - especially in light of ever changing tactics and some of the evolving powers of the USA govt, including NSA crap.

See quote, below. It's basically bordering on being offline. It's way safer than Tor.

"It goes a step beyond the darknet, the former home of Silk Road, where users need to download specialized software in order to access sites. It is more comparable to Bittorrent, a p2p file sharing platform. Similarly, OpenBazaar is a p2p e-commerce platform that doesn’t involve any central servers. The software, along with a database of the marketplace, is downloaded to your computer." - See more at: http://forexmagnates.com/bitcoin-picks-openbazaar-to-launch-beta-banco-santander-to-devise-bitcoin-strategy/#sthash.vYKJDqE2.dpuf
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100


1. Winklevoss will be shot down... agreed. But I am saying that as a former law student. All of the "analysts" say that it will go through and so that conventional wisdom should be used as the current peg especially given the ability to just use tight stop losses.

"former law student" is supposed to bring some expertise?   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


WE do NOT really have any strong or credible evidence that Winklevoss will be shot down...   I thought that the weight of the persuasive evidence (upon the preponderance of the law talk) was that Winklevoss would go through?





2. GABI is partially priced in and will not be the boon we wished it was. That said, it should feature some upside in buy activity, even if the purchases are off the market, because the coins accumulated would have otherwise been dumped on the exchanges. Thus, this brings upward pressure.

Gabi is NOT priced in b/c the purchase of BTC is an ongoing activity, and we do NOT know when they will be buying their 200k BTC.. or if they have already bought them... I agree if they have already bought a large majority of the 200K BTC, then probably GABI is priced in.




3. Dubai is another market... it's a good thing... not a huge thing. Dubai and re-expanding into Japan might help patch the issue of new users temporarily, but coins are being mined a lot quicker than newbies come in and so many get burnt early and develop an aversion. Thus, we have a problem of an only marginally expanding base coming in the next year.

4. OpenBazaar is both an Ebay and a Silk Road. The founders of it won't say that because they aren't trying to incur legal liability and are trying to play the role of decentralized middle men. But, it is a dark market... that's what happens in dark markets. That may breathe some life into this whole gambit for a little longer.

In a nutshell... we should be higher at this specific moment in time. As far as a few months from now... that could be a disaster. A few years from now... a total f---ing disaster.


I agree with you general sentiment that there is going to be upward pressures on the acquisition and accumulation of BTC, and accordingly upward pressure on price in the short term.  On the other hand, I do NOT understand how you could thereafter conclude that further down the road there is doom and gloom.  In fact further down the road, there should be increased upward pressure on attempting to acquire and to accumulate BTC and therefore upward pressure on BTC prices, which I would NOT characterize as anything approaching "disaster."







On the Winklevi... we have a few talking heads who have said their opinion and thrown in words like "the preponderance of the law." SEC provides much less latitude when an investment is not limited to sophisticated, wealthy, or experienced investors. See Purina case. The ETF will be limited in large part to such investors, but these activities will touch on the investments of less sophisticated investors. I could go into a multitude of cases, but it would just be attacked by FUD. So, let me just say that Securities Regulation was my best and favorite class, my prof was the former SEC enforcement head, and I just don't see the s--- happening. I may very well be wrong. I figure that's what stop-losses are for.

All the rest... cool.

In the long-term, people get burnt or change their mind. There is also a much more pervasive screwing of traders now that Wall Street has entered the game. Finally, the deals being attached through the mainstream, uber-regulated, above board side of the market are just f---ing lame. 10% off on Dell products? Really? I could do better than that without even trying on Amazon and heaven forbid I did try I could probably get 50% off sticker on Dell products. So, really, I don't see that working out too hot. You can count all the wallets you want or use the word adoption in every sentence, but lame is lame.

For the average, everyday user Bitcoin just becomes a tax hassle with at least a feeling of less security (although I don't really think that is all that true at all) where the value of your funds are ever in the hands of a non-politically accountable Junta of insiders (like with the U.S. dollar, but to a higher degree because Wall Street is historically filled with scumbags) and your balance could be effectively zeroed out upon implementation of bans the next time a terrorist acts a fool or the government starts to worry it might replace state backed currencies. Also, knowing all of those hassles, or even suspecting them, it takes a truly virtuous soul to give it a chance (and they'll end up being f---ed over by one of these bucket shop exchanges). So yes, I said f---ing disaster because, frankly, this s--- is going to be worth $5 comes 2020, and maybe even sooner, unless we turn back towards the dark markets.

Which is why OpenBazaar, to me, is really tremendous news.
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

OpenBazaar will be like a Silk Road that no one can shut down.


I thought that silk road was already like a silk road that could NOT be shut down.

This is more P2P as opposed to centralized through a market hub. The architecture is a little more thoughtful. It should hold strong.

o.k. b/c I though that silk road was already using p2p and Thor and all that jazz.. 

I am a little confused about some of the technical anonymizing capabilities - especially in light of ever changing tactics and some of the evolving powers of the USA govt, including NSA crap.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
A big hidden ask wall has been selling on Bfx for 6 hours at 500.27.

It was nice of him not to just dump. 

"nice"    hahahahahaha..... They's too scared to just dump BTCs.. that is why they's be creating these invisible walls.   Cheesy Cheesy Wink

time to kiss $500 goodbye

Yeah... let's kiss $500 goodbye for the next half hour...   bye, bye $500...  Kiss   Kiss   Kiss



See you in half an hour.    Cheesy    Tongue
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
400's again for some seconds when I was out, but still close to no volume.

And seriously ppl posting rocket pictures at this situation?

I'm always afraid when we're crossing such a psychological threshold, as I'm afraid some stop losses are being fired, that trigger some longs on margin to be liquidated. Things tend to go pretty ugly on Finex when that happens, you know Wink

I understand the worry, but I don't think these things have lasting impact.  Hell, even if the price dropped to $200, it wouldn't change my 2020 outlook.  And I'll be hodling.

vuduchyld:  I am using your above response as a springboard for my below comments, and I am NOT directing anything specifically at you, since I already have come to understand that you and I have very similar ideas regarding our investing strategies in BTC.

Nonetheless,  let me say:::: 2020 is nearly 5.5 years from now, and it seems a bit too long term regarding whether one should keep buying today, or hodl or sell.  I mean a person does NOT really need to commit to that long of a time period in order to be bullish about BTC in the "long term."

BTC seems like one of those kinds of assets that any investor would need to reassess about every couple years, and these days to assess the various potential competitors to the extent that they may be evolving, yet I believe that currently  a person can make a pretty solid investment commitment decision for a 2-3 year time-frame and to consider that 2-3 year period as fairly long term.. b/c at the moment BTC does NOT have any real meaningful competitors.

Don't get me wrong, I am bullish about BTC long-term and I am planning to stay invested in BTC as long as it appears to have long-term potential and it is NOT getting beat out by any competitor crypto, but in bitcoinlandia, 5.5 years is nearly the whole life of BTC.. so in another 5.5 years, BTC will be 2X.... that is if BTC is still alive and well at that time.  

You know several trolls mention some silly-ass stupid ideas about where bitcoin will be in 100 years or some other time period way into the future.  Sure it is o.k .to have visions about the long term and sure it is o.k. to have a long term plan, but really, BTC is a new space.. .and therefore the farther into the future that one is attempting to prognosticate, the less need to attempt to predict specifics b/c many variables can project specifics into vastly different trajectories.

And probably several of us who remain bullish about BTC remain of such disposition based on BTC remaining the main game in town in light of the competition, and even though several people are spouting off regarding the competition  and the potential of the competition, the competition remains mere distractions and it is likely that these downward whale manipulators are only going to be able to keep the cap on BTC for so much longer.. whether they can achieve this for a month, 6 months or longer than a year, many of us will continue to hang in their with our BTC investment, absent some material significant negative change in BTC fundamentals.

most likely bitcoin will die in 1-2 years

From time to time, you can be very profound.  I like your extensive analysis and your eye for detailed explanations.   Smiley

Edit:  Also, your use of the qualifier, "most likely" strikes me as a bit bullish, no? 
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


1. Winklevoss will be shot down... agreed. But I am saying that as a former law student. All of the "analysts" say that it will go through and so that conventional wisdom should be used as the current peg especially given the ability to just use tight stop losses.

"former law student" is supposed to bring some expertise?   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy


WE do NOT really have any strong or credible evidence that Winklevoss will be shot down...   I thought that the weight of the persuasive evidence (upon the preponderance of the law talk) was that Winklevoss would go through?





2. GABI is partially priced in and will not be the boon we wished it was. That said, it should feature some upside in buy activity, even if the purchases are off the market, because the coins accumulated would have otherwise been dumped on the exchanges. Thus, this brings upward pressure.

Gabi is NOT priced in b/c the purchase of BTC is an ongoing activity, and we do NOT know when they will be buying their 200k BTC.. or if they have already bought them... I agree if they have already bought a large majority of the 200K BTC, then probably GABI is priced in.




3. Dubai is another market... it's a good thing... not a huge thing. Dubai and re-expanding into Japan might help patch the issue of new users temporarily, but coins are being mined a lot quicker than newbies come in and so many get burnt early and develop an aversion. Thus, we have a problem of an only marginally expanding base coming in the next year.

4. OpenBazaar is both an Ebay and a Silk Road. The founders of it won't say that because they aren't trying to incur legal liability and are trying to play the role of decentralized middle men. But, it is a dark market... that's what happens in dark markets. That may breathe some life into this whole gambit for a little longer.

In a nutshell... we should be higher at this specific moment in time. As far as a few months from now... that could be a disaster. A few years from now... a total f---ing disaster.


I agree with you general sentiment that there is going to be upward pressures on the acquisition and accumulation of BTC, and accordingly upward pressure on price in the short term.  On the other hand, I do NOT understand how you could thereafter conclude that further down the road there is doom and gloom.  In fact further down the road, there should be increased upward pressure on attempting to acquire and to accumulate BTC and therefore upward pressure on BTC prices, which I would NOT characterize as anything approaching "disaster."





full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Is it just me or is the hash rate more than double what it was in June? =S
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100

OpenBazaar will be like a Silk Road that no one can shut down.


I thought that silk road was already like a silk road that could NOT be shut down.

This is more P2P as opposed to centralized through a market hub. The architecture is a little more thoughtful. It should hold strong.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
400's again for some seconds when I was out, but still close to no volume.

And seriously ppl posting rocket pictures at this situation?

I'm always afraid when we're crossing such a psychological threshold, as I'm afraid some stop losses are being fired, that trigger some longs on margin to be liquidated. Things tend to go pretty ugly on Finex when that happens, you know Wink

I understand the worry, but I don't think these things have lasting impact.  Hell, even if the price dropped to $200, it wouldn't change my 2020 outlook.  And I'll be hodling.

vuduchyld:  I am using your above response as a springboard for my below comments, and I am NOT directing anything specifically at you, since I already have come to understand that you and I have very similar ideas regarding our investing strategies in BTC.

Nonetheless,  let me say:::: 2020 is nearly 5.5 years from now, and it seems a bit too long term regarding whether one should keep buying today, or hodl or sell.  I mean a person does NOT really need to commit to that long of a time period in order to be bullish about BTC in the "long term."

BTC seems like one of those kinds of assets that any investor would need to reassess about every couple years, and these days to assess the various potential competitors to the extent that they may be evolving, yet I believe that currently  a person can make a pretty solid investment commitment decision for a 2-3 year time-frame and to consider that 2-3 year period as fairly long term.. b/c at the moment BTC does NOT have any real meaningful competitors.

Don't get me wrong, I am bullish about BTC long-term and I am planning to stay invested in BTC as long as it appears to have long-term potential and it is NOT getting beat out by any competitor crypto, but in bitcoinlandia, 5.5 years is nearly the whole life of BTC.. so in another 5.5 years, BTC will be 2X.... that is if BTC is still alive and well at that time. 

You know several trolls mention some silly-ass stupid ideas about where bitcoin will be in 100 years or some other time period way into the future.  Sure it is o.k .to have visions about the long term and sure it is o.k. to have a long term plan, but really, BTC is a new space.. .and therefore the farther into the future that one is attempting to prognosticate, the less need to attempt to predict specifics b/c many variables can project specifics into vastly different trajectories.

And probably several of us who remain bullish about BTC remain of such disposition based on BTC remaining the main game in town in light of the competition, and even though several people are spouting off regarding the competition  and the potential of the competition, the competition remains mere distractions and it is likely that these downward whale manipulators are only going to be able to keep the cap on BTC for so much longer.. whether they can achieve this for a month, 6 months or longer than a year, many of us will continue to hang in their with our BTC investment, absent some material significant negative change in BTC fundamentals.

most likely bitcoin will die in 1-2 years

This. It will be replaced by something that didn't go "pop" (pop culture). Once we invited regulation we invited demise. I am sorry, but 10% discounts from Dell doesn't cover the speculative risk that comes with the currency in the eyes of the average investor. I mean we basically turned this whole thing into regular money with the only difference being instead of the Federal Reserve we have uber whales and Wall Street pulling the strings and being the Junta that decides whether the price goes up or down. OpenBazaar will be huge, though. It provides a novelty over regular currency and a large, non-risk averse user base.

These are my opinions. You all already know I am a long-term bear albeit somewhat measured in that view. Things could change or a major government could collapse, but these possibilities... and they are possible... are still low enough risk in the next couple of years that I wouldn't put my money on it. Also, those governments, especially the U.S., would probably put the kibosh on a now much more heavily regulated Bitcoin to delay any such collapse. So, even that idea is in practice a bit of a loser.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10

OpenBazaar will be like a Silk Road that no one can shut down.


I thought that silk road was already like a silk road that could NOT be shut down.

you mean SILKROAD ver 2.0
legendary
Activity: 3934
Merit: 11405
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"

OpenBazaar will be like a Silk Road that no one can shut down.


I thought that silk road was already like a silk road that could NOT be shut down.
Jump to: