When one person messes up, it affects a few. When Government messes up, if affects millions.
Yep, appears to be another meaningless truism.. without any real legs but supports an anti-govt thesis.
I'll bite. How many people were killed by violence in the past 200 years (v_total)? How many of those were killed by direct acts of a government (v_govt)?
What is the ratio between (v_total - v_govt) / n_humans and v_govt / n_govt ? If you divide the latter by 2 million, is it smaller than the former?
Off the top of my head, from general knowledge of history, I will estimate 320 million=v_total, 300=million v_govt, the number of governments at 1000,
and the number of people at 10 billion. 2/1000 violent deaths per human, 300000 violent deaths per government. The ratio is then 1:150,000,000.
Yeah, Richy_T's comment seems well justified. I would have to have non-cancelling compounded errors in the region of 2 orders of magnitude for it to be even slightly inaccurate. It does not appear meaningless. It appears factual.
I'm not sure how or even if it meaningfully supports an "anti-govt thesis", however.
It is one thing to make a comment and describe why you are making it, and it is another thing to justify how you arrived at the comment and then to discuss causation or correlation.
I do NOT disagree with the likely substantive result that governments partake in exploitation and killing and injustices; however, I do NOT subscribe to the idea that we therefore need to eliminate or remove government as the solution to the problem.
Governments are likely both the problem and the solution - even though how to get to the point that they are the solution is quite a task to get governments to act in the interests of the people on a large scale rather than frequently serving the narrow interests of the most influential. I do NOT doubt that sometimes trickle down economics and trickle down benefits do work; however, frequently, government officials get bought out or scared out from engaging in rules and policy making and applications that will truly serve the people rather than serving a narrow set of interests.
Yet, as I already said many times, I do NOT see the solution of throwing out the baby with the bath water, b/c if we were NOT to have government, we would likely be in even a worse state of affairs in which fewer people are rich and monopolizing and exploiting and the rest of us are serfs (more serfs than we already are treated).