Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 26311. (Read 26713344 times)

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
guys i shorted @ $462

that means within the next 48h ~$500 will be breached...

and I will literally lose my shorts or eat them.

good to know


A user on here posted on reddit that he got btc on btc-e for $350!

not the first time btc-e gr8ly overreacts to a swing down...
N12
donator
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
guys i shorted @ $462

that means within the next 48h ~$500 will be breached...

and I will literally lose my shorts or eat them.
Thank you!
sr. member
Activity: 270
Merit: 250
guys i shorted @ $462

that means within the next 48h ~$500 will be breached...

and I will literally lose my shorts or eat them.
hero member
Activity: 777
Merit: 500
A user on here posted on reddit that he got btc on btc-e for $350!
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10

I have proposed a partial explanation: starting May/20, a few people got wind of something that made them buy all they could.  Now those people changed their minds, and dumped everything back.  So the price got back to where it was.  Is this so much sillier than the narwhals(*) that people have been discussing here?

(*) a large sea mammal reputed to be a cross between a whale and a unicorn.


That's how I see it, too.

If manipulation is: Clever players making money with bullish overexcitement, then it's heavy manipulated. Agreed. Business as usual, on all markets, not only bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
things you own end up owning you
wow... you have spent too much time on this thread Jorge...  you are sounding more and more like a troll lunatic/Bitcointalk.org member/one of us than an academic that anyone would take seriously, shame for you.  

The language may be a failed attempt to be funny but the opinion is quite serious.  What we saw since May/20 was a sudden rise from ~440$ to ~640 that no one can (or wants to) explain, then seven weeks of wandering around 600$, then a sudden drop back to ~470, that no one can (or wants to) explain either.   Why is it absurd to consider all that as a single event?

I have proposed a partial explanation: starting May/20, a few people got wind of something that made them buy all they could.  Now those people changed their minds, and dumped everything back.  So the price got back to where it was.  Is this so much sillier than the narwhals(*) that people have been discussing here?

(*) a large sea mammal reputed to be a cross between a whale and a unicorn.


here is a good explanation for that one: "Dell adding Bitcoin" buy the rumors and sell the news, some insiders already knew this was happening so they bought thinking the price will skyrocket when the news is out and they got caught with disappointment when this didn't happen.... what follow next is the market doing its thing.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
I think we might have seen the worst. Too bad because I had orders around $430 that didn't get filled.

ah don't worry, I think they will be filled and you will be sorry for not putting them lower.
Could very well be.  I have lower bids as well , so keep it coming  Grin.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
wow... you have spent too much time on this thread Jorge...  you are sounding more and more like a troll lunatic/Bitcointalk.org member/one of us than an academic that anyone would take seriously, shame for you.  

The language may be a failed attempt to be funny but the opinion is quite serious.  What we saw since May/20 was a sudden rise from ~440$ to ~640 that no one can (or wants to) explain, then seven weeks of wandering around 600$, then a sudden drop back to ~470, that no one can (or wants to) explain either.   Why is it absurd to consider all that as a single event?

I have proposed a partial explanation: starting May/20, a few people got wind of something that made them buy all they could.  Now those people changed their minds, and dumped everything back.  So the price got back to where it was.  Is its so much sillier than the narwhals(*) that people have been discussing here?

(*) a large sea mammal reputed to be a cross between a whale and a unicorn.


A possible explanation: a lot of not so steady hands thought "bottom was in, now lets go in for TO DA MOON $10k by end of the year".
Then it turned out that bitcoin doesn't magically give instant riches as quickly as they wanted it to (not enough new buyers yet at higher prices), and then they got fearful when it started going down again.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001
things you own end up owning you
I think we might have seen the worst. Too bad because I had orders around $430 that didn't get filled.

ah don't worry, I think they will be filled and you will be sorry for not putting them lower.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
wow... you have spent too much time on this thread Jorge...  you are sounding more and more like a troll lunatic/Bitcointalk.org member/one of us than an academic that anyone would take seriously, shame for you.  

The language may be a failed attempt to be funny but the opinion is quite serious.  What we saw since May/20 was a sudden rise from ~440$ to ~640 that no one can (or wants to) explain, then seven weeks of wandering around 600$, then a sudden drop back to ~470, that no one can (or wants to) explain either.   Why is it absurd to consider all that as a single event?

I have proposed a partial explanation: starting May/20, a few people got wind of something that made them buy all they could.  Now those people changed their minds, and dumped everything back.  So the price got back to where it was.  Is this so much sillier than the narwhals(*) that people have been discussing here?

(*) a large sea mammal reputed to be a cross between a whale and a unicorn.
legendary
Activity: 1320
Merit: 1007
The next ATH delayed until Jan/Feb
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
more like a troll lunatic/Bitcointalk.org member/one of us than an academic  

The two are mutually exclusive?  Smiley

actually yeah as it goes you are right...I think the two may go hand in hand : )
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
I think we might have seen the worst. Too bad because I had orders around $430 that didn't get filled.
legendary
Activity: 4242
Merit: 5039
You're never too old to think young.
more like a troll lunatic/Bitcointalk.org member/one of us than an academic  

The two are mutually exclusive?  Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2373
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
Looks like it's time to put the paper wallets in deep storage and go out and enjoy the sunshine.

F**k, it's overcast and stormy.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
wow... you have spent too much time on this thread Jorge...  you are sounding more and more like a troll lunatic/Bitcointalk.org member/one of us than an academic that anyone would take seriously, shame for you.  
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Likely moving to retest.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
Ladies and Gentlemen, you have just watched /The May 2014 Bitcoin Bubble/, complete, performed by the Peking Opera Buffa Company.  Now back to our regular programming.
legendary
Activity: 1320
Merit: 1007
Lets add an appropriate soundtrack to this price doom. Lyrics fit the bear's situation so well.

http://youtu.be/DeumyOzKqgI?t=29s
Jump to: