Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 26794. (Read 26656998 times)

legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
Want privacy? Use Monero!
Traders dumping pre World Cup Finals.

oh yeah, that classic pre WC Finals dump. I remember the same happened 4 years ago  Grin
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
People dumping.
This is very bullish. The price is about to explode. Train is leaving. Just shaking out the weak hands. Let me adjust some trendlines to show you how this is expected and nothing to worry about. To the moon!

Did i miss anything?
legendary
Activity: 1237
Merit: 1010
Prices have been boring for a long time now. What am I supposed to do, sit tight prettily? I want to feed on high volatility and troll those who made the wrong calls Grin

Go up a lot, or down. Do something.

You guys realize that a stable coin is good for the cryptoconomy right?

Yes, stable does = good
But
Higher value also = good
So

We need to just go ahead and figure how big bitcoin needs to be and make it that value now so it can stay there and be stable

 Grin

That's not going to happen until
BTC reaches a fairly high market cap, something like 100k per coin, and even then there will likely be continued and ongoing increases in value.

Is this confirmed?
legendary
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1094
Cost / Value continues to plummet, as Price slowly inches higher.
its time to buy.


For some reason, Bitstamp believes it's time to dump.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1001
Traders dumping pre World Cup Finals.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
There was a +60 CNY sudden jump on the Chinese exchanges at about 2014-07-11 11:30 UTC, which is 19:30 China time.  It could have been someone hearing something about that (the Forbes post is dated 2014-07-12).
That's low ammount anyway, i want to se atleast +200-500 Grin that would make me happy.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
There was a +60 CNY sudden jump on the Chinese exchanges at about 2014-07-11 11:30 UTC, which is 19:30 China time.  It could have been someone hearing something about that (the Forbes post is dated 2014-07-12).
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner

often the bitcoin market price won't react to news because of fundamental market conditions, its no secret bitcoin was over valued at 1000$ last year, the  secret is that it was WAY over valued at 1000$ last year, Speculators bought and pumped then dumped, and they are still in the process of dumping for an unhealthy profit no doubt... so theres no reason to spike up 10% on bullish news when you still have plenty of sellers at 640.
That's true but i think that when bad news come around or some FUD then value mostly goes down and traders react on these news..

I was there, traders would have sold at 800 had it not been for the massive FUD storm that rolled in.  That FUD storm, forcing the speculative money out; it was inevitable and good! honestly price held up very well during this bear market. I dont think we will see 400 again even if we had another shit storm of bad news and epic FUD right now, again due to the Speculative nature of price, at this point 400 is off the table no matter what.
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
I believe that the Forbes blogpost author misses the point.  If you own a large amount of bitcoin, creating a bitcoin-backed investment fund (BBIF), like SMBIT, is an efficient way to sell those coins without depressing the price or looking like you lost faith in the Moon.

The idea is that instead of selling the bitcoins directly, you sell shares of the BBIF, which are pegged to the daily BTC market price.  Whenever some client buys some BBIF shares, the fund management company (FMC) is supposed to use his money to buy bitcoins.  If you are the FMC owner and manager, you just sell your own personal bitcoins (which you acquired for pennies years ago) to the FMC, at market price.

That way you can discreetly sell 20'000 BTC of yours in one go, at market price -- without the huge negative slippage you would face by selling on exchanges.  And the FMC gets to buy 20'000 BTC, to satisfy their contract with the BBIF client, at market price -- without the huge positive slippage (and hence loss) of buying them at the exchange.

Even if the bitcoin price crashes some day, the loss will fall entirely on the BBIF clients, since the BBIF shares will crash too; whereas the FMC and its shareholders will have still made a nice profit from the BBIF administration fees.

Indeed, if the FMC management can see a crash coming, they could make additional profit by selling the coins beforehand while the price is still high, and then liquidating the BBIF shares at the crash-bottom price.  Or vice-versa if they see a rally coming.  More generally, they could make additional profit, beyond the posted shares, by playing the market with the FMC coins (although that may be risky, and should be severely constrained by the BBIF contract).

The FMC could also use its coins to manipulate the market (given its minuscule liquidity) to inflate the price while selling the BBIF shares, and lowering it when some BBIF client decides to liquidate.  But, of course, no bitcoin entrepreneur would resort to such sleazy banker tricks in order to make money.

sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250

often the bitcoin market price won't react to news because of fundamental market conditions, its no secret bitcoin was over valued at 1000$ last year, the  secret is that it was WAY over valued at 1000$ last year, Speculators bought and pumped then dumped, and they are still in the process of dumping for an unhealthy profit no doubt... so theres no reason to spike up 10% on bullish news when you still have plenty of sellers at 640.
That's true but i think that when bad news come around or some FUD then value mostly goes down and traders react on these news..
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner

often the bitcoin market price won't react to news because of fundamental market conditions, its no secret bitcoin was over valued at 1000$ last year, the  secret is that it was WAY over valued at 1000$ last year, Speculators bought and pumped then dumped, and they are still in the process of dumping for an unhealthy profit no doubt... so theres no reason to spike up 10% on bullish news when you still have plenty of sellers at 640.

pretty sure the bulk of this speculative money leaving has left at 700... at which point supply won't be what it use to be and were going to see 10 to 20% daily moves on news.

to sum up, selling now is nuts! but for some poeple not selling now is nuts! bitcoin is a hell of a ride.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
Cost / Value continues to plummet, as Price slowly inches higher.
its time to buy.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner

Yea, I had to read over the article a couple times for it to sink in what it meant.  Grin

chinese poeple, they're GRrrrrr8!
hero member
Activity: 910
Merit: 1003
http://www.technews.org/active-stock-facebook-inc-nasdaqfb-to-enter-digital-payment-world/2910133/

What part of "trustless" do they not understand? Irelands central bank getting behind a propitiatory system, Brazils doing the same but on a different and likely incompatible platform, wonder who's next? Popcorn at the ready because they could all end up destroying themselves in a fight to monopolise digital money with platforms that simply cant compete with free Smiley
I owe you to check on that Brazilian thing.  (It may be just about "digital money", such as debit cards and boletos. When the BCB issued the standard warning to the people about the risks of cryptocurrrencies, they had to add a paragraph clarifying that cryptocurrencies were NOT "digital money"in the sense of Article NNN of Law XXX.)

But I can tell you already that Caixa Econômica is not just a Brazilian bank; it is the only remaining retail bank majoritarily owned by the federal government.  The federal government appoints its CEO, and uses it for its social assistance programs, like the Family Grant program and financing of low-cost housing.  It could not get any worse for Libertarians, I guess.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1159
Merit: 1001

Yea, I had to read over the article a couple times for it to sink in what it meant.  Grin
Jump to: