Twitter and Bitcoin should never be compared. Shame on Bitcoin mag not that I expect any better from them. I am getting tired of hearing about Elon now especially because he has no connection to Bitcoin he apparently got out of Bitcoin years ago. Stop giving him attention
Breaking News! FTX owns Bitcoin Magazine 🤡
Hold up.
"
Bitcoin is dead" is the new "Twitter is dead"
Bitcoin has nothing to do with Twitter but it has been declared dead ~466 times to date -
https://99bitcoins.com/bitcoin-obituaries/ - but it's
not dead.
"Twitter is dead" hasn't been declared quite so many times yet but the comparison is valid.
It's okay if you didn't get it; Elon didn't get it either it seems but please calm the fuck down.
When you have to 'splain the joke, it's no longer funny... except for when a Simpson's character
(who also makes hats) 'splains it.
Wow, congrats to the ex-smokers here! I smoked hard for 30 years, vaped for 10, no nothing now for the last 3 years.
I figured up how much I was spending on cigarettes, and once I quit, that amount became my DCA. Even if BTC goes to zero, I have done a better thing for myself.
If you smoke cigs, try to quit. I felt a lot better, and I didn't think I felt bad.
Missed this.
I smoked from 1970 to 1996
I quit on feb 29th. 1996
Used the cigarette money to pay the 30 year mortgage off in under 15 years.
I am proud and very happy for you.
Well, I am not exactly sure how to figure the savings - and of course, besides the financial matters, there are likely health savings and even smell of the house, clothes and car savings.. but if we estimate around
$30 per week saved over 3 years, then that would be about $4,710 that we could invest into bitcoin, which would be about 0.25 BTC.. So nearly break even on the cost per BTC and their current value... but could well have been a good investment for nanobtc.
And, for you Philip... we could suggest that you could have put
that money ($30 per week) into bitcoin for the past 9 years, and it would have caused you to invest around $14.1k into bitcoin and would have gotten you somewhere in the ballpark of nearly 13.9 BTC... and surely we would not be complaining about that kind of a return on investment...
By the way, the reason that I picked 9 years is because that DCABTC website ONLY goes back 9 years, and if we added an additional 2.5 years, you may well have gotten you to more than 100 BTC with adding that additional $30 per week for 2.5 more years.. = ($30 x 130 weeks = $3,900) since the average price per BTC for those 2.5 years between mid 2011 and late 2013 would have been likely been less than $40 per coin (so $3,900 would have likely gotten you 100 coins by itself without the additional last 9 years that only would have gotten you 13.9 BTC with that $30 per week).