saying that religion causes wars is like saying chemicals cause cancer. i have yet to see any living thing that did without chemicals, or any conscious mind that did without beliefs which cannot be concluded by evidence and logic alone.
it is difficult to take seriously anyone who attempts to preclude argument by declaring that disagreement is in itself disqualifying evidence - and probably not worth the effort to do so.
I think this is highly dependent on what you consider a "belief." If belief strictly means religion, I couldn't disagree more, agnostics being the clearest example. Or are we talking about beliefs like "I believe my wife isn't cheating on me." Even then, one could argue that you logically think that because you have a good relationship, or she is a very loyal person in general, or maybe you're just good at laying the pipe. I honestly have a hard time agreeing that
no person can only have beliefs backed in evidence and logic.
I believe that Aminorex's point is valid, and there is NO person who does NOT make leaps of faith in his/her daily activities. Whether those leaps of faith rise to the level of a religion may be another story. Sometimes our leaps of faith are about matters that are so trivial no one would call those particular believes as part of a religion b/c they may NOT be part of any regular routine practice or deeply held. An atheist may deny that some of his/her practices are religious, yet many atheists, if interviewed (or interrogated) would end up disclosing that his/her logic only carries so much of the burden. Even within belief systems, some individuals are highly reflective and introspective, and others could NOT be bothered with such, unless you catch them on a "good" day in which they have been well fed, well rested and generally NOT preoccupied by real concerns, such as the volatility of BTC prices.
Atheism and agnosticism are not the same thing.
I never meant to imply that they were. I should have clarified... since u mentioned agnosticism and I mentioned atheism... In the end, my comment was intended as non-denominational.
Agnosticism doesn't really fit in with that, though. "I dunno" is hardly a leap of faith. It's actually 100% evidence based, since you know what you know, and you know that you don't know.
Atheism doesn't fit in with that either. Actually I don't even see much difference between agnosticism and atheism at all, since atheism doesn't claim to *know* that God doesn't exist either, they just don't believe it until they see some evidence. To give an example, I can tell you some story right now and you can decide to believe me on my word or not. If you don't believe me because you don't trust me or the story just sounds unlikely that's a perfectly fine reason, but that doesn't mean that you claim to *know* that it isn't true what I'm saying. You actually have no idea whether I speak the truth or not, maybe it's true but you simply have no reason to believe me at this point. If I came to you with some actual evidence you may be swayed and say yeah good point now I believe you. So the standpoint of an atheist is basically the same as an agnostic (both are open to evidence to convince them), except for some reason people like to make a distinction between the two. Probably because saying you don't believe something sounds too strong for people who prefer to call themselves agnostic, although it's basically the same thing if you break it down semantically. Both the atheist and agnostic don't know whether a God exists and would like to see some evidence first.
They may make leaps of faith in other areas though. I believe in reincarnation and ghosts for example even though I don't believe in God. I believe we are all infinite beings and have created our own universe to experience, learn and live in. I have no proof of this either, but I do feel it's more likely than a creator outside of ourselves. You'd get into more bizarre questions then like who created the creator, and if the answer is that the creator is infinite then my next question would be is why can't we be infinite ourselves then? Occam's Razor and all.
But who knows, my beliefs are definitely not fixed in stone and maybe I'm completely wrong. That's where I think the main difference lies between me and religious people, they usually don't accept the possibility they could be wrong about their own beliefs. Because doing so might upset their God who requires absolute trust and devotion.