Do you all really think this is him?
Nothing makes me think it isn't. It really isn't of much importance other than for the "human angle" though.
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 28980. (Read 26610919 times)
March 06, 2014, 11:59:33 AM
Nothing makes me think it isn't. It really isn't of much importance other than for the "human angle" though.
March 06, 2014, 11:57:04 AM
Look at the precision which satoshi used when writing his posts.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/satoshi-3
Punctuation and grammar is sophisticated and exact.
Then look at the letter on this page
http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3#ixzz2vCSq2huK
No way, these are by the same person.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/satoshi-3
Punctuation and grammar is sophisticated and exact.
Then look at the letter on this page
http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3#ixzz2vCSq2huK
No way, these are by the same person.
Double space after punctuation is same though. It's rare to see someone to hit double space after it and it's there on both satoshi's posts and that letter.
I'm Satoshi too then.
Mr. Satoshi, you know where you can send your coins, I'll take care of them
March 06, 2014, 11:57:03 AM
Seriously now, the part of the article that made we wince was the comment by the guard when the reporter told them who the guy was. I do not know why, but that detail flashed a yellow light in my mind...
Yes, it read too much like dialogue from a novel than real life. As for the quote it's highly likely it was taken out of context or just made up. It's her word against his and she's more media savvy so she can drown out any complaints that he makes.
March 06, 2014, 11:55:15 AM
Jorge you're turning into fonzie. 
Sorry, the joke was too good to pass.
But you must at least agree that the audits of MtGOX by Ver and of Coinbase by Antonopoulos were pathetic, to put it mildly?
EDIT: removed the double spaces after punctuation.
March 06, 2014, 11:53:24 AM
You can summarize this long rant into "I'm right, even if I'm not right". Religious nuts like these create more harm then good to bitcoin imo.
This could be said of you as well.
Whats up with intelligent people arguing desperately against bitcoin in a bitcoin forum like Jorge Trollfi and you, kkaspar?
Is there a point in shouting bitcoin will fail to a group that mostly believe in bitcoin? What if you actually turn out to be right?
You gain absolutely nothing from this. And don't come with the "I'm only here to help" argument. Thats utter bullshit
It's funny that you say that people are actually "arguing against bitcoin". I myself find that bitcoin is an interesting piece of software, but I also find myself arguing against the religious zealots who have gathered around bitcoin.
It's common for religious people to speak in those terms. I have often heard that if I don't agree with the Christian world view, then I'm actually against god. People aren't able to comprehend that there could be different understandings of god and if you don't accept the religious dogmas in Christianity, then you are not against god. It's not surprising to see the same mentality here.
I'm here for the same reasons then most probably are, to read and to speak my mind. I think that bitcoin doesn't need religious worshipping, so I can't see that I have to either worship it or leave. I like to keep an sober mind and take bitcoin as it is. An interesting piece of software that currently is an innovative gambling platform, but what also brought forward ideas that can trigger the start of something more."
It seems that we already determined, several times in the past day that this religious accusation that is leveled at bullish bitcoiners is bunk.
March 06, 2014, 11:52:19 AM
Quote
"He is very wary of government interference in general," she says. "When I was little, there was a game we used to play. He would say, 'Pretend the government agencies are coming after you.' And I would hide in the closet."
The best part.
March 06, 2014, 11:52:09 AM
It does become very diffcult to understand their purposes in being in these kinds of forums, and maybe in the end they are merely paid by some big bank or something to undermine bitcoin and to spread disinformation and to distract us from engaging in meaningful discussions about bitcoin.
By meaningful do you mean "agreeable only"? Certainly that's what it looks like. And that's the cultist attitude that's so vehemently denied: shouting down all those who refuse toe the party line. Nutty conspiracy theories suggesting those not 100% in agreement are from a big bank to undermine bitcoin don't help with the image.
There's far more to be gained by having open conversation.
March 06, 2014, 11:51:30 AM
The vultures are descending. You need to understand how journalists think. I was on my college newspaper, so I have a little experience.
This article http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3
is going to be used as a rationalization that Dorian Nakamoto is a public figure, and therefor not subject to the legal protections provided to private citizens.
They are going to hound this man. He needs to lawyer up in a hurry.
This article http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3
is going to be used as a rationalization that Dorian Nakamoto is a public figure, and therefor not subject to the legal protections provided to private citizens.
They are going to hound this man. He needs to lawyer up in a hurry.
I simply cannot believe that the man who wrote this:
"Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model."
Also wrote this:
"the parking fee + gasoline costs $10 now to get there from my home and i would go there more often with my mother for shoppings."
Journalism is a cutthroat business and they only need the slimmest of pretexts to do awful things to people.
Yes, I get that. But I'm pretty much saying that they've got the wrong guy. And the fallout, for him, will indeed be pretty awful for a while.
I don't know about that. I think it's likely that whoever wrote about train service is not the same Dorian Nakamoto, but that doesn't matter. The DM doxxed by McGrath will need money for lawyers and security to protect himself and his family, which means that if he really is SM, he may need to sell some BTC, which would rattle the markets.
Here are some reviews on Amazon by Dorian S Nakamoto:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/ATILATX3PEXZ4/ref=cm_cr_rdp_pdp
Note the difference in language...very weird.
March 06, 2014, 11:49:58 AM
Satoshi playing CCMF:
I lol'd way too hard at your caption.
Thanks
March 06, 2014, 11:48:48 AM
Satoshi playing CCMF:
March 06, 2014, 11:48:33 AM
Jorge you're turning into fonzie.
I would rather have fonzie turning into Jorge.
March 06, 2014, 11:48:13 AM
Look at the precision which satoshi used when writing his posts.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/satoshi-3
Punctuation and grammar is sophisticated and exact.
Then look at the letter on this page
http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3#ixzz2vCSq2huK
No way, these are by the same person.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/satoshi-3
Punctuation and grammar is sophisticated and exact.
Then look at the letter on this page
http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3#ixzz2vCSq2huK
No way, these are by the same person.
how do you know that was Satoshi who wrote that, I can make a better picture than the one above and sign it with his name, also everything on that story fits perfectly to that man, I am almost convinced that is him...
and by the way, he used his real name, nice move last thing expected....
A big piece of evidence that's missing is a link between this guy and crypto mailing lists. The real Satoshi was heavily influenced by cryptographers that went before him so I would have though it highly likely that he would be a subscriber to these lists.
March 06, 2014, 11:47:29 AM
The vultures are descending. You need to understand how journalists think. I was on my college newspaper, so I have a little experience.
This article http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3
is going to be used as a rationalization that Dorian Nakamoto is a public figure, and therefor not subject to the legal protections provided to private citizens.
They are going to hound this man. He needs to lawyer up in a hurry.
This article http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3
is going to be used as a rationalization that Dorian Nakamoto is a public figure, and therefor not subject to the legal protections provided to private citizens.
They are going to hound this man. He needs to lawyer up in a hurry.
I simply cannot believe that the man who wrote this:
"Commerce on the Internet has come to rely almost exclusively on financial institutions serving as trusted third parties to process electronic payments. While the system works well enough for most transactions, it still suffers from the inherent weaknesses of the trust based model."
Also wrote this:
"the parking fee + gasoline costs $10 now to get there from my home and i would go there more often with my mother for shoppings."
Journalism is a cutthroat business and they only need the slimmest of pretexts to do awful things to people.
Yes, I get that. But I'm pretty much saying that they've got the wrong guy. And the fallout, for him, will indeed be pretty awful for a while.
I don't know about that. I think it's likely that whoever wrote about train service is not the same Dorian Nakamoto, but that doesn't matter. The DM doxxed by McGrath will need money for lawyers and security to protect himself and his family, which means that if he really is SM, he may need to sell some BTC, which would rattle the markets.
March 06, 2014, 11:46:56 AM
Seriously now, the part of the article that made we wince was the comment by the guard when the reporter told them who the guy was. I do not know why, but that detail flashed a yellow light in my mind...
March 06, 2014, 11:46:41 AM
ok so quickly could someone tell me how this story holds any water whatsoever?
So all I have to do is find some random guy who's name is satoshi and a fairly unknown history, pay him like $50 and make him feel important, get a couple of juicy quotes, post an article and have millions of readers who instantly believe me?
And here I thought the bitcoin community was inhumanly skeptical, yet they randomly choose to believe this at face value?
So all I have to do is find some random guy who's name is satoshi and a fairly unknown history, pay him like $50 and make him feel important, get a couple of juicy quotes, post an article and have millions of readers who instantly believe me?
And here I thought the bitcoin community was inhumanly skeptical, yet they randomly choose to believe this at face value?
People who sold their coins or are looking to buy in would love this to be true because it would create speculation about SN cashing out his coins. I think most reasonable people would raise an eyebrow or two at this story first. But this is the speculation forum, expect bears/trolls to grasp at any straw they possibly can.
March 06, 2014, 11:46:27 AM
Jorge you're turning into fonzie.
March 06, 2014, 11:46:03 AM
The question is whether that reporter owns any bitcoin. If she does, obviously we cannot trust her. Her story would carry as much weight as Roger Ver's audit of MtGOX's finances.
What if she's short, and thinks it'll make the price go down? What if she has other financial incentives (pay based on how many people read her page)? Honestly this just sounds like complete and utter BS.
March 06, 2014, 11:45:19 AM
Look at the precision which satoshi used when writing his posts.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/satoshi-3
Punctuation and grammar is sophisticated and exact.
Then look at the letter on this page
http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3#ixzz2vCSq2huK
No way, these are by the same person.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/satoshi-3
Punctuation and grammar is sophisticated and exact.
Then look at the letter on this page
http://www.businessinsider.com/dorian-satoshi-letter-and-train-2014-3#ixzz2vCSq2huK
No way, these are by the same person.
Double space after punctuation is same though. It's rare to see someone to hit double space after it and it's there on both satoshi's posts and that letter.
March 06, 2014, 11:43:12 AM
The question is whether that reporter owns any bitcoin. If she does, obviously we cannot trust her. Her story would carry as much weight as Roger Ver's audit of MtGOX's finances.
March 06, 2014, 11:43:02 AM
ok so quickly could someone tell me how this story holds any water whatsoever?
So all I have to do is find some random guy who's name is satoshi and a fairly unknown history, pay him like $50 and make him feel important, get a couple of juicy quotes, post an article and have millions of readers who instantly believe me?
And here I thought the bitcoin community was inhumanly skeptical, yet they randomly choose to believe this at face value?
So all I have to do is find some random guy who's name is satoshi and a fairly unknown history, pay him like $50 and make him feel important, get a couple of juicy quotes, post an article and have millions of readers who instantly believe me?
And here I thought the bitcoin community was inhumanly skeptical, yet they randomly choose to believe this at face value?
Jump to: