Bitcoincharts.com dropped BTC-e/USD?
Now its seems that they list only BTC-e/EUR and BTC-e/RUR. Yet Bitcoinwisdom.com still lists BTC-e/USD.
And they still don't list Huobi or OKCoin, but list BTC-China. For technical reasons, or political?
Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 30082. (Read 26708956 times)
January 28, 2014, 05:33:56 PM
January 28, 2014, 05:31:54 PM
This is the way I see it. Support for hodl policy.
I think you may have it backwards. The government, any government, is essentially an engine for driving money to the special interests. They do that through taxation and regulation to get distributed costs and concentrated benefits. Bankers may be a special interest group, but we are a more concentrated and therefore more special group. For bankers, it is far more cost effective to hedge against a bitcoin takeover by buying a small stake in it than it is to fight us with largely ineffective prohibitions and regulations. Most bankers who even know about bitcoin think it is a joke or a fad. The banksters who see it as a threat are not numerous enough to fight it and don't want to do it if their fellow bankers are going to free ride on their efforts. So they hedge and join us. The other bankers won't realize what a disruptive technology it is until it's too late. they are the Tower records and blockbuster video owners of the financial world.
I used to work in the music business - it was unreal how it resisted downloads, until it was too late and sank their entire business model.
After fighting and slagging off Napster et al, Steve Jobs came along and took over 25% of the entire music business at a stroke - and it was game over.
They never saw it coming, refused to.
January 28, 2014, 05:26:15 PM
This is the way I see it. Support for hodl policy.
I think you may have it backwards. The government, any government, is essentially an engine for driving money to the special interests. They do that through taxation and regulation to get distributed costs and concentrated benefits. Bankers may be a special interest group, but we are a more concentrated and therefore more special group. For bankers, it is far more cost effective to hedge against a bitcoin takeover by buying a small stake in it than it is to fight us with largely ineffective prohibitions and regulations. Most bankers who even know about bitcoin think it is a joke or a fad. The banksters who see it as a threat are not numerous enough to fight it and don't want to do it if their fellow bankers are going to free ride on their efforts. So they hedge and join us. The other bankers won't realize what a disruptive technology it is until it's too late. they are the Tower records and blockbuster video owners of the financial world.
January 28, 2014, 05:25:43 PM
Its generally true. Its why women flip their moods so often and are never satisfied. Its why they say "you can never win an argument with a women" - because she is never arguing logic and facts.
omg Lulz
January 28, 2014, 05:20:59 PM
You need to troll harder.
Not so much. He's quite good. I mean, even people who are deeply averse to trolling begin to appreciate his work after a while. I always feel a little better after a proudhon troll. He's making the world a better place, and I wouldn't want him to overwork himself to exhaustion!
All you need to do is post something that makes sense and is a real solid one for the bulls, and the trolls become alarmed.
January 28, 2014, 05:17:17 PM
You need to troll harder.
Not so much. He's quite good. I mean, even people who are deeply averse to trolling begin to appreciate his work after a while. I always feel a little better after a proudhon troll. He's making the world a better place, and I wouldn't want him to overwork himself to exhaustion!
You are right... say what you want but the guy is a pro troll - makes me smile with his "newses"
January 28, 2014, 05:15:24 PM
You need to troll harder.
Not so much. He's quite good. I mean, even people who are deeply averse to trolling begin to appreciate his work after a while. I always feel a little better after a proudhon troll. He's making the world a better place, and I wouldn't want him to overwork himself to exhaustion!
A glorious confirm to you, sir. Here, have 4000 newses. I confirm.
January 28, 2014, 05:13:40 PM
You need to troll harder.
Not so much. He's quite good. I mean, even people who are deeply averse to trolling begin to appreciate his work after a while. I always feel a little better after a proudhon troll. He's making the world a better place, and I wouldn't want him to overwork himself to exhaustion!
January 28, 2014, 05:13:08 PM
This is the way I see it. Support for hodl policy.
Except there's a clear downward trend since the ATH and no new ATHs have come in. This has corresponded to an increase in bad newses, which don't appear to be slowing. As it is confirmed that there really cannot be any more good newses from this point on, it's safe to conclude this downward trend will continue, as I have confirmed.
Except all the increase in good news which doesn't appear to be slowing and the "bad news" was clearly pointed out as mere tools to get clicks and ad sales for news companies.
Oh and this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Confirmation in your own head that there cannot be any more good news ≠ confirmation.
You need to troll harder.
I do not see anyone asking or needing confirmation from you. In fact, nothing you say can be confirmed. Nor is there agreement on what you consider "confirmed" and the empirical definition, hence the list of fallacies. If you can't agree that your argument is invalid because it's a fallacy then you are in quite the pickle my friend.
I can confirm I am not in a pickle.
starting to think you may be a pickle.
January 28, 2014, 05:10:52 PM
This is the way I see it. Support for hodl policy.
Except there's a clear downward trend since the ATH and no new ATHs have come in. This has corresponded to an increase in bad newses, which don't appear to be slowing. As it is confirmed that there really cannot be any more good newses from this point on, it's safe to conclude this downward trend will continue, as I have confirmed.
Except all the increase in good news which doesn't appear to be slowing and the "bad news" was clearly pointed out as mere tools to get clicks and ad sales for news companies.
Oh and this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Confirmation in your own head that there cannot be any more good news ≠ confirmation.
You need to troll harder.
I do not see anyone asking or needing confirmation from you. In fact, nothing you say can be confirmed. Nor is there agreement on what you consider "confirmed" and the empirical definition, hence the list of fallacies. If you can't agree that your argument is invalid because it's a fallacy then you are in quite the pickle my friend.
I can confirm I am not in a pickle.
starting to think you may be a pickle.
January 28, 2014, 05:10:44 PM
Congratzzzzz !
Just one advice : sleep or take a nap whenever you can
Yeah:) This is my second, I know how that goes. Anyway some odds and ends then back to the hospital, see ya all.
CCMF!
YEAH !!! MOAR GOATZ!!!!!
Congratulations friend! My best wishes for a very prosperous life for you, your kids and your wife!
January 28, 2014, 05:09:47 PM
Why Lee doesnt speak about the -40% in LTC diff on one week ?
I just saw that!!! WOW!!! It must have hurt!
January 28, 2014, 05:09:07 PM
This is the way I see it. Support for hodl policy.
Except there's a clear downward trend since the ATH and no new ATHs have come in. This has corresponded to an increase in bad newses, which don't appear to be slowing. As it is confirmed that there really cannot be any more good newses from this point on, it's safe to conclude this downward trend will continue, as I have confirmed.
Except all the increase in good news which doesn't appear to be slowing and the "bad news" was clearly pointed out as mere tools to get clicks and ad sales for news companies.
Oh and this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Confirmation in your own head that there cannot be any more good news ≠ confirmation.
You need to troll harder.
I do not see anyone asking or needing confirmation from you. In fact, nothing you say can be confirmed. Nor is there agreement on what you consider "confirmed" and the empirical definition, hence the list of fallacies. If you can't agree that your argument is invalid because it's a fallacy then you are in quite the pickle my friend.
I can confirm I am not in a pickle.
January 28, 2014, 05:07:48 PM
This is the way I see it. Support for hodl policy.
Except there's a clear downward trend since the ATH and no new ATHs have come in. This has corresponded to an increase in bad newses, which don't appear to be slowing. As it is confirmed that there really cannot be any more good newses from this point on, it's safe to conclude this downward trend will continue, as I have confirmed.
Except all the increase in good news which doesn't appear to be slowing and the "bad news" was clearly pointed out as mere tools to get clicks and ad sales for news companies.
Oh and this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Confirmation in your own head that there cannot be any more good news ≠ confirmation.
You need to troll harder.
I do not see anyone asking or needing confirmation from you. In fact, nothing you say can be confirmed. Nor is there agreement on what you consider "confirmed" and the empirical definition, hence the list of fallacies. If you can't agree that your argument is invalid because it's a fallacy then you are in quite the pickle my friend.
January 28, 2014, 05:07:26 PM
Dogs - I remember when we posted Spartans...
May I be nostalgic...?:
May I be nostalgic...?:
January 28, 2014, 05:03:58 PM
This is the way I see it. Support for hodl policy.
Except there's a clear downward trend since the ATH and no new ATHs have come in. This has corresponded to an increase in bad newses, which don't appear to be slowing. As it is confirmed that there really cannot be any more good newses from this point on, it's safe to conclude this downward trend will continue, as I have confirmed.
Except all the increase in good news which doesn't appear to be slowing and the "bad news" was clearly pointed out as mere tools to get clicks and ad sales for news companies.
Oh and this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies
Confirmation in your own head that there cannot be any more good news ≠ confirmation.
You need to troll harder.
I cannot confirm what you just said.
January 28, 2014, 05:02:39 PM
January 28, 2014, 05:00:58 PM
Why Lee doesnt speak about the -40% in LTC diff on one week ?
Because he doesn't want to be embarrassed by mentioning his competitor DOGE.
or this?
January 28, 2014, 04:58:45 PM
In a way. You could say Charlie should have done a better Litecoin sales job but I think it's a credit to the man that he just answered all the questions as helpfully and impartially as he could. He does not appear to be motivated by increasing the value of his own portfolio and came across as both smart and genuine.
He's no public speaker - nor should he need to be really if he doesn't want to. There's more than enough support within the Litecoin community to offer support in that department as things progress.
He's no public speaker - nor should he need to be really if he doesn't want to. There's more than enough support within the Litecoin community to offer support in that department as things progress.
Actually, yep - he seemed genuine. I was just watching the screen and hoping for more.... Frustrated re-born bull, now I am all BTC (as much to get out of Gox for good as anything else).
I really thought the trend-breaking rally was finally due, we are so close to the 31st, so I figure if it didn't happen yesterday, it now - probably - will not*.
But what do I know? This is Bitcoin.
Someone post some Spartans?
EDIT: * I mean the 'crash' may not after all happen
January 28, 2014, 04:56:35 PM
Why Lee doesnt speak about the -40% in LTC diff on one week ?
Because he doesn't want to be embarrassed by mentioning his competitor DOGE.
Jump to: