The is the argument against a gold (or bitcoin) standard by the FED and banking status quo.
Under today's credit fiat system, it makes no sense to "save" money in currency since it continuously inflates. Instead savers are suppose to invest the money into businesses, capital spending, stocks, etc.
The problem is today no one saves this way, instead savers (those with disposable income over expenses) spend money frivolously on vacations/restaurants/crap instead of saving for the long term, and many of those who do invest do so in bubble type assets (i.e. large houses).
The fiat credit system is suppose to work in theory, but in practice it obviously does not. Hence bitcoin. It provides a real escape for true savers.
Correctly observed. It is so bad, in fact, that the assets that the people (who know about the diminishing value of saved fiat) use to park their savings, houses, stocks and bonds, take on exchange value in addition to their intrinsic value, in effect becoming money to some degree. These are the bubbles, Mr. Greenspan. They pop when better money become available. In a sense, you could say that the exchange value is the bubbly value. Conclusion: All moneys are bubbles, they pop when better money arises.