Author

Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 33848. (Read 26712978 times)

sr. member
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
Didn't check the data, but I'm the only one feeling this is the Wednesday with lowest volume in 2013? We had many weekends with more volume than this.

That would impossible to tell as we're not finished yet!



Wednesday trade for 2013: note that 9th Jan 2013 was VERY quiet, right before launching quietly into the dominant trend of the year so far!

Edit: 9th busiest Wednesday ever in USD volume and we have 9 hours to go.

Where did you get this data? Is it easy to access? Thanks for a reply.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
Didn't check the data, but I'm the only one feeling this is the Wednesday with lowest volume in 2013? We had many weekends with more volume than this.

That would impossible to tell as we're not finished yet!



Wednesday trade for 2013: note that 9th Jan 2013 was VERY quiet, right before launching quietly into the dominant trend of the year so far!

This was @ 10:30 it's now around 37,000.

Thanks for the data, very interesting indeed. So volume is not so low, we had slower Wednesdays not only in January... But also in February!

Memory is a bitch. I guess it's just me, anxiously waiting for the tipping point we should see soon enough.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 501
Stephen Reed
Interesting watching the numerous 0.1337 sales nibble away at the available bids. I assume that it is a bot. I cannot figure a motive. Its not frequent enough to cause lag. It is not even handled - so I rule out an arb bot. Why not just buy from the large bid at the top of the depth in one lot.

Is it a signal among a team of traders? Does anyone do such a thing?
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500


History repeating itself?

If you mean "The price goes up and the price goes down", yes.

Lulz, this was my exact thought as well
sr. member
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
"Don't go in the trollbox, trollbox, trollbox"
Didn't check the data, but I'm the only one feeling this is the Wednesday with lowest volume in 2013? We had many weekends with more volume than this.

That would impossible to tell as we're not finished yet!



Wednesday trade for 2013: note that 9th Jan 2013 was VERY quiet, right before launching quietly into the dominant trend of the year so far!

Edit: 9th busiest Wednesday ever in USD volume and we have 9 hours to go.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2373
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


History repeating itself?

If you mean "The price goes up and the price goes down", yes.
legendary
Activity: 2097
Merit: 1070
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250


History repeating itself?
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 501
Stephen Reed


I figure 194 bitcoins mined per hour at this rate. Interesting to compare that number with hourly trading volume - which was 1095 in the last complete hour at Mt. Gox.

full member
Activity: 153
Merit: 100
Didn't check the data, but I'm the only one feeling this is the Wednesday with lowest volume in 2013? We had many weekends with more volume than this.
get some sleep while you can!
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1007
Well, the oscillations (gravy train) are essentially over on the mother-of-all-triangles.  We are entering the pinch point.  The next few days will be interesting.

In all metrics you could go either way:

On the one hand we have 17M on the bid side which is over double what we had originally climbing into 100.  But the end of the bank holiday did not increase bids.  Of course, the pinch point is not a good time to place bids if you can just watch the charts so there could be secret rocket fuel on Gox.

On the news front we have very bullish news coming out of China, but medium term. But those directly involved will not be able to buy for quite some time.  And we seem to have news exhaustion in the western world -- what coverage there is is all about speculation or regulation.  But lots of bears posting here... implying that people who wanted out are out.

Fundamentally, the transactional uses for BTC that have existed since early/mid 2012 seem to remain strong (although I haven't heard updates from gambling sites, etc).  So the 2012 extrapolated exponential trendline (call it E0) seems very solid.  However, the question the market will resolve in the next week is whether the E1 trendline (starting Jan 2013) is also solid (leaving E2 and E3 as the bubble exponentials).  On the bull side, note the trendline started near the block reward halving event & adoption of BTC payment options by certain web sites (these events sequester/limit supply and remain in force).  On the bear side, that trendline is still freakin' insane :-), and anyway "final capitulation" event would likely plumb below it (we are right on it now).  Also on the bear side: rpietila thinks its a sure thing, and is basing his "I am THE new gentleman elite" posts on its continued performance.  ;D



Apologies for quoting a day old post on a topic that moves as fast as this, but I wanted to say thanks for a very interesting analysis. By all means, keep on posting :)
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
Didn't check the data, but I'm the only one feeling this is the Wednesday with lowest volume in 2013? We had many weekends with more volume than this.
legendary
Activity: 3388
Merit: 4775
diamond-handed zealot

There is no BTC reality. Currency value equals to amount of gold it holds.


abject and total history/reality fail
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Shorting BTC is starting to be available on different platforms. When that spreads, we will see more downward pressure.

I am shorting it... and I know it will fall. Its just making all of you a fool

There is no BTC reality. Currency value equals to amount of gold it holds. [...]

Send me all your paper monyz plzokthnks.
(will send .0001 BTC)
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1823
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
SAQ
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Wow, 30 million dollars is being traded almost every day.

https://i.imgur.com/TdYkm6z.jpg
hero member
Activity: 894
Merit: 501


I hope this isn't too noobvious but doesn't the USD/BTC line strongly support the bears for the next couple of months? I'm sceptical about the alternative likelihood of prolonged sideways action
legendary
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
Shorting BTC is starting to be available on different platforms. When that spreads, we will see more downward pressure.
There is no BTC reality. Currency value equals to amount of gold it holds.

Bullshit. 1971 the USD detached completely from gold and EUR was never linked to it anyway.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
Shorting BTC is starting to be available on different platforms. When that spreads, we will see more downward pressure.

I am shorting it... and I know it will fall. Its just making all of you a fool

There is no BTC reality. Currency value equals to amount of gold it holds. BTC has nothing to back itself. No Equity. Pure liquid capital investement. When the anonymous japanese runs away with all your money.... people will cry here

My guess is this is pure troll (and Rampion, I think he's probably referring to Satoshi not Karpeles) but what's interesting about it is that there are people out there who believe so strongly in the simplistic 'gold-backed-or-valueless' thing that when shorting becomes easily available a significant amount of money will be bet against Bitcoin in this manner.

I can't see enough of the bigger picture to tell what how this would affect the market but my guess is they'll have to be borrowing btc from somewhere to short it so if there's a high demand then maybe there'll be profit to be made in lending at a reasonable interest?

He refers to Satoshi? Man, I'm writing a software so as soon as one of the first generated bitcoins move, I'm automatically dumping everything!

(just joking)
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
Who is the anonymous japanese? As this is a thread about MtGox, which is a Japanese company, maybe you refer to the owner? FYI: he is not anonymous and he is not japanese. He is French and his name is Mark Karpeles.

What is public knowledge about this guy? There is no Wikipedia article or the like...
Is he a weirdo?

Well, there aren't Wikipedia articles of a lot of CEOs. I'd say that 90% of CEOs in the world don't have a Wikipedia entry for them. But there is a Wikipedia entry for MtGox.

MtGox is a fully registered company, scrutinized by law, with a large history of legitimacy. That's why is such a pain to comply with all their documents requirements, because they are ultra legit.

Public knowledge about Karpeles? You have to be new to ask for that. There's a lot of public info about him. Start checking here: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Mark+Karpeles+mtgox
Jump to: