S2F is not significantly or materially disrupted, yet..
Sure S2F might be delayed or it might need to be adjusted.. but it is not disrupted.
#justsaying
delayed or adjusted == disrupted.
Hahahaha
Fair enough..
We can disagree on that point, even though it is a fairly reasonable semantical point....
You may have already noticed that I have a bit of triggering in me when I just get somewhat irritated by some of the prematurity of the attacks (and denigrations) on the S2F model, and perhaps PlanB brought some of these kinds of attacks on the model upon himself when he has been making claims (even in much of 2020 when the BTC price was underperforming the model's expectations) that if x price does not occur by y date then S2F is broken and blah blah blah nonsense (then he was making similar kinds of claims in late 2021 that if certain BTC prices are not met by certain dates then the S2F model is broken.. blah blah blah).... .
I'm not one of those to jump on a bandwagon, feel free to go back and check my history.
I have said STF was broken from day 1.
It does not take into account the institutional fuckery going on.
The S2F model does account for various other factors such as institutional fuckery, by saying that those other factors are not substantially and significantly important in terms of figuring out BTC price dynamics overall... which is quite likely true.
Sure in the short term anything can happen and there are a bunch of fucktwats trying to push BTC price around, but in the long term they can all go fuck themselves because King daddy not going to give too many shits?
Think about what matters and that is NGU technology? and there can be all kinds of efforts to stop it or to slow it down or to shift the UPpity downward on the curve.. but in the end, price is likely going to continue to follow something like the S2F model, even if the BTC price does not follow S2F with precision and even if there are all kinds of DOWNity manipulation attempts, King Daddy gives no shits.. and the S2F model is ultimately suggesting that it accounts for most of what matters to such a material and substantiate degree that the BTC price is going to end up in the ballpark of its predictions (maybe one side or the other side of the curve.. but largely the curve is a pretty decent trajectory given what is known and what is not known... and no matter what the future is not going to be certain, but S2F gives us some pretty damned decent ideas.. even though it is not the full picture.. and even though there is also exponential s-curve adoption factors that are related to network effects and Metcalfe principles).
Paper bitcoin is their goal to our detriment and that was not satoshi's dream.
Well you can scare your lil ass off about how you believe that they might be successful and whine away about it.. and sure maybe they will be successful. I am not going to disagree with you that they are trying to do exactly what you suggest, and some of them believe that they can be successful in creating a paper bitcoin system that is going to be as easy to manipulate as gold.. maybe a few extra challenges, but there are beliefs that they are going to be successful.. .but a lot of folks who are buying into bitcoin (even though less than 1% of the world population) are not of the belief that the status quo rich are going to be successful in their abilities to manipulate bitcoin in the same kinds of ways as gold.. even if the status quo rich are going to continue to do their damnedness (and even possibly to get governments and various shitcoins into their pockets to help them)..
So good luck if you believe that they are going to be successful or you are going to merely whine about it and likely prematurely proclaim that the S2F model is wrong because it fails/refuses to account for how powerful the status quo rich is... yeah right. Good luck with that. I hope that you have not failed/refused to sufficiently/adequately prepare for UPpity because of those kinds of beliefs.