Are all particles decentralized? If every particle is fundamentally the same particle; produced by the same fundamental conditions, can they be produced anywhere in the
universe? That might explain both the particle wave duality and the particle pair production as a phenomenon of the conservation of energy law. Gonna try to figure this one out.
Think of it this way: red is information. Red is also a known and established color that only has one appearance attribute, being red.
A red car, a red flower, a red book. So the information "red" is decentralized but always present everywhere. It's the physical attribute to different forms which makes it something more than just red (like different particles having different quantities of energy, but having different forms)
And don't tell me to google QFT. Its not the same.
I'll tell you what.
Dumb lil me does not exactly know where you are going with this - yet since the topic does not sound bad because you used a buzz word that some of us frequently attempt to understand within a kind of relative context, there might be some possibility that your question will somehow relate to the topic of this thread...
Perhaps?
Perhaps?
TLDR: Don't know if clever or just using the right buzz words.
You're smart enough to be here with us. That shines a light on your intelligence. Once Bitcoin becomes the sole world money we will see a rise of 100-125 million coiners to a world population of 7.9 Billion coiners. Thats an increase in 6320% in demand. A $20k USD investment into Bitcoin will make anyone a future millionaire if they invest @44k now. we will see a decentralized government where the people's money goes where its supposed to... to the people.
You want to know the richest countries in the world? - coming soon:
Bitcoin trading volume on online exchanges in various countries worldwide in 2020(in million U.S. dollars)I hope Satoshi is a CIA project, not a guy. The dollar is going to be not worth the paper its printed on. All Fiat currency is now phasing out. The world's going to get flipped on its head in small timespan of mere weeks, once Bitcoin starts heavily overweighing against all the Fiat in the world. Government will realize how futile the attempt at trying to force the world to use their useless controllable "money". (I include CBDCs in this as well)
People will still prefer Bitcoin. Government dies, everybody is free. A new era begins. An Era where taxes become a vote, not a one-sided agreement.
Communism finally working because the human element of corruption has been cut out.
Russia gets to be number 2 at the top. Which might be what the Russian-Ukraine war is really about. Theater war about having defeated communism while sharing the new world order. USA gets to be at the top, of course. Russia gets to be player 2.
Hows that for buzzwords?
You seemed to have devolved into a kind of stream of consciousness in your attempt to connect your earlier post to where you consider bitcoin might be going...
As far a buzzwords, I did not feel too buzzed out... yet I doubt that you can consider which countries might become bitcoin rich merely based on what appears to be their current BTC trade volume.
Even though I don't mind seeing where all of the increased role of bitcoin goes, I have a lot of doubts that governments are going to end up becoming completely irrelevant - and if some kind of ideal - government-less (or is it government-free?) society ends up playing out, then likely that is going to play out way past our lifetimes, and perhaps even past the lives of our grandchildren, in the event that we might be just having kids now and grandchildren are coming within a couple of decades.
Seems to me that there is always going to be some role for government, even if bitcoin could cause incentives for structures to make the governments more responsive towards actual public goods and public services that cannot be taken care of by private structures. Surely, there have been a lot of arguments that suggest crazy kinds of wars that are out of touch of the wlll of the people cannot be carried out - without our consent, that would indicate that wars and battles would likely have to cause the governing to seek the consent of the governed.. especially if the wars were to grow to any meaningful level...
Maybe I am lacking some imagination, but I don't really want to presume too much regarding what society is going to look like - even if I do agree that it does seem quite likely that more and more value is going to be flowing into bitcoin, and bitcoin already has a lot of built-in incentive structures that are difficult to fuck with.. but does not mean that there are not going to be a lot of continued challenges ahead that continue to try to become more and more innovative in terms of the ways to attempt to fuck with bitcoin's various incentive structures and to attempt to game the systems in various ways.. and don't really want to presume to know about how many challenges are those going to impose or how they might play out to cause bitcoin or its various implementations to play out differently than any way that we can imagine to envision such resolutions, in the present..
......
I know you are the thread's weird Uncle, but was that really necessary?
"Weird uncle" hahahahaha ... you seem to be promoting him... just by using the term "uncle."
....
Some even post their scratchpad-style bitcoin songs here
You got me with a touché bro...
I will surely get around to recording/producing that scratchpad mess for real, before I'm roasted in the cremy.
When I do, I'll be sure to make it available for 2000 sat.
But if you enter the code LEGENDARYWOBRO, you get a 50% discount....
Working your way up to a batman's slappening, no?
Pumpening discounts for a likely shitcoin
(or would you prefer to refer to it as an NFT?).