the path of least resistance
which i believe is up at this temporal point
At this temporal point.. .. hahahahahaha
the next 3 hours and 26 minutes happen to be critical
tm because according to one of our most duly recognized
and frequently wrongedly blowing in the wind "analysts"
(if that's what he be properly called?), such time duration happens to be within this temporal point.
Go sorcerers that be!!!!!!!!! How are you today's entry, friends? In my country, I'm quite excited to welcome sweet tea and green prices, which rose slightly this morning by a few percent and made me believe this is a good step in this month we've been waiting for, the bulls will appear, I'm quite optimistic about this, that glory will return even though the queue for btc is so dense that they buy and sell, hehe
there will be a surprising confirmation, when the harvest moment will come, Ath will peak in Q2 this year, cheers
But why ruin the moods by bringing or mentioning other crap that might have relations with BTC ?
The fact of the matter is that everything in the world is going to have relations with BTC, so why point out specific ones that seem to be mere distractions..
Intended to ruin dee moo?
[edited out]
...........
You are not continuing to roll the dice like I am. And there is a chance I pay more for that mistake than you do.
But who knows?
There's nothing wrong with shaving some profits on the way up, and for sure there can be an insurance rationale behind such shavings - so in fact whether there would have been an "objectively" better way to play it - seems to be somewhat irrelevant because the insurance angle has a bit of intangibility to it... because it is both psychological and financial (but also within the financial angle there is no real easy way to place a price upon the benefit that was gotten from a scenario that may well have ended up not playing out.)...
Maybe it could be said that so many times, we end up paying more from insurance than any benefit that we get because we never get into any car accidents and our house never burns down.. but we would really be a in an insecure position in the event that we did not carry the insurance on those items. perhaps? perhaps?
Edited to add a wee bit: So, yeah taking out insurance seems to have been what LFC did, which is not unlike what other members do in their managing their BTC holdings.. and each of us may well structure our insurance differently.. and second-judging others some of us might consider one member or another took out too much insurance or not enough or just played the whole insurance angle in ways that defeated the purpose.. by engaging in some kind of trading rather than having a system or even playing BIGGER swings - which would be more in line with the insurance ideas rather than trading ideas...... at the same time, the whole matter could end up playing out in such a way that some members (BTC HODLers) figure out ways to accomplish both.