Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 3961. (Read 26720873 times)

This has gotta be a wobro.... amirite?   

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay3MCImPt_0

When you quote or re-quote a jpg resize it.
I don't want to see her face smeared all over this place.




And the sock puppets...

I was Disappointed to see that Hillary Clinton was still able to find anyone who gives a Fuck what she has to say. Why not just slink away into the darkness die in peace? (Well as much Peace as someone with her past can accomplish)

GOOD!

Its a speculative asset of the ultra rich and hedge funds and is artificially inflated to the point people cannot afford to live under a fucking roof!

It also has the side effect of making EVERYONE pay higher taxes on the property they own.

The only reason its legal is because it is putting money into the Gov coffers.

Explanation

So what is your point?
We all know not your keys not your coins.
I get what she wants.
Why did you quote her?

Are you against what she says?
Are you for what she says?
The reality is all exchanges could say f. u. to russian coins and russia could still move the coins.

So what are you getting at?

It's Bitcoin's fault that there are shitty projects thus Bitcoin should implement something or other to allow that shit on its blockchain? That your "argument"? Fucking hell.

There are sheeple reading this thread, like a "news feed page". And it is important that they don't get involved in lesser coins that are not strongly tagged and tightly pegged with the percentage fall or increase discrepancy of BTCiTcoin.    

*edit(): Example:  some coin might drop 2% while BTCiTcoin drops 1% . But it will rise 2% while BTCiTcoin will rise 1% or stagnate. But some sh!tcoins, because they don't have 'age', 'publicity', 'good software' or 'software' at all, 'a strong crowd that will blindly follow and have strong beliefs in it'. Some coins might just crash 20% and recover only 2%.

I am having some trouble recognizing why this kind of a discussion point is even relevant at this point and in this thread..

It's like I am stepping back to arguments that were being made 4 years ago...  

In other words, the market has already spoken long ago.. both in the material sense and also in the dying down of any kind of necessity to give any attention to those various copy-cat attempts at bitcoin.. and there seems to be no need to be bringing up the various copy-cat and forked shitcoins... especially here... unless there is some kind of specific point that is specifically relevant in current events.. besides just giving attention to the obvious losers of copy cat version of shitcoins for seemingly no reason at all.


Why would we need to flesh that out here?  It seems very unimportant in terms of deciding which shitcoin is less shitty.. and take that irrelevant talk somewhere else because any kind of discussion and attention to various shitcoins just ends up in a devolving increased discussion of irrelevant and distracting bullshit  - and ain't nobody got time for that.


why?

who cares?

Unless you can make some kind of connection to bitcoin, then why discuss?

I am not talking about some amorphous connection in order to discuss which shitcoin happens to be less shitty, and seems that we have bitcoin related topics, instead of devolving into nuances of shitcoin comparisons.



Of course, CBDCs are going to be another attack vector on bitcoin... and people will likely be confused about what the fuck they are and what is the differences between the various kinds of money (to the extent that some people will care to think about these matters at all) to the extent that various CBDCs have not really gotten started too much yet.. except maybe in China.. or if there might already be some electronic vouchers already being issued with limitations on them.... and surely there are going to be several levels of sadness to some of those kinds of CBDCs to the extent that they end up getting issued and end up getting any kind of foothold in terms of a form of competition of ways to receive and spend value... with potentials of total control of abilities to spend money.. possible time limits, location limits, "acceptable" ways to spend.. and they (CBDCs) might even end up being another way to end up promoting bitcoin through a kind of Streisand effect. though it could take a bit of time before people realize the level of the inferiorities of such CBDCs in spite of their likely being marketed by their issuers.


I feel like I need to be slapped.

This is a way better way of making the point.

I think it is a good thing. Texas and Alaska rigs will get opened again and profitable. Creates a taxable event on own soil.
And I do understand the hurt from inflation, but that money printing has to go inflate somewhere.
 .. WELCOME TO ZimBaBwe' of North 'aMurica.   

Which is why I believe that BTC is still going to be the best place for DeFI, if BTC supported smart contract from scratch damn maybe we won't have so many crappy projects today, I'm looking at you rbtc and SOVRYN.

Explanation

Every move the Biden administration is in line with the goal of destroying the USD reserve currency status, creating poverty and starvation in the US (and west in general), the continuation of the destruction of small businesses while the giant ones get even stronger,  and ultimately to pave the way for the New World Order, or Great Reset, or whatever they are calling it this week.

The decisions they are making do seem STUPID when you take them at face value.  But that is not truly the reason for the decisions.  Once you realize what is, then you see that every decision lines up perfectly with the goals of the people actually calling the shots.

Bracing for the "crypto" EO.  I expect it to be pretty negative.  Most likely some sort of ban on "self hosted wallets" will be part of it, I'd think.  At least.

The utter lunacy is that all of this could have been avoided if Biden had just maintained the existing sanctions on Nordstream 2. Everyone in Washington knew it, the only reason Putin had not tried to take back Ukraine was because of fear that Nordstream 1 would be compromised, cutting off his only avenue for transporting oil to EU. But on the day he took office the sanctions were lifted (maybe because Hunter Biden and John Kerry's kid were being paid off with Burisma jobs?) A bill went through the Senate to reinstate the sanctions in Feb but it only got 56 votes, 7 of which were Democrats facing tough 2022 election challenges, and the Democrats filibustered to require 60 votes. On the very same day they were screaming to the media that the filibuster was a Jim Crow relic and must be overturned to pass Build Back Better!

The entire sham, including the deaths of so many is nothing more than a big scheme to crash the world economy so they can roll out CBDC and WEF world governance without taking responsibility for the massive destruction and corruption that comes with it! Stop getting caught up in the circus music and start making your preparations folks! Fiat is about to become worthless overnight and millions will die in the transition!

That's always in the back of my mind.  If/when my feline friends go before me, I know I'll be shattered.

oh man sorry to hear

that hurts

That's one way to look at it I suppose...

Existence is a cruel joke.

Then you get to die at the end, go to Heaven, and have a very impassioned eternal debate with God about what the fucking point of all that was, anyway.

Fucking stupid space rock...

That's all I've got Dude, so sorry for your loss...

It's a cruel joke. Man's perfect companion, the epidimy of loyalty love and adoration. Play, fight, eat, or sleep always by our side. No better friend, except... only 1 sixth of our average lifespan.
There are no words that can ease the pain you feel, only time can dull its sharp edge. But know this, the man who has never felt sorrow is a man who was never truly loved. Your pain is proof positive of his love for you, and yours for him. Now his pain is over but the love carries on.