Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 4442. (Read 26710313 times)

Godamn! I can almost hear Jay's ballistic keyboard tapping in the distance....

Oh gawd Hueristic...

Get a grip.

the first? 

Oh come on....



By the way, I will admit that you Hueristic, have a pretty long history of harping on nonsense (relatively speaking), including but not limited to that particular issue (which yeah seems to be part of the point that you are making).. as a seemingly form of goading.. but your claim to "first" status comes off as a wee bit muchie.. even for this here semblance of a peep wannabe.


Overall I do get the various points that you are making, yet I believe that you may well be even misstating some of your own ways of learning along the way and tweaking your thinking on the king daddy topic. 

What I am trying to say is that you are someone who monitors the overall bitcoin situation, and sure there might not be BIG changes in what is happening behind the bitcoin scenes whether facts, logic or any combination of such; however, I would suggest the fact that you both UPped your "action" threshold from $50k to $100k and your ongoing determination to NOT adjust or tweak your decision has to do with a variety of factors and indictors and perhaps also based on what a variety of convincing people in the BTC space are continuing to say about bitcoin, so sure, maybe you are not triggered into making any further changes, and sure maybe what PlanB says only plays on you in less than 10% arenas, but still there are likely these kinds of ongoing discussions that could cause you to change your threshold if the information were to change.. I think so.. even if you want to deny it until the cows come home.. 
 hahahahahaha  #nohomo.


NOT!!!!!


The best solution is to NOT be proclaiming what is best into simplistic formulas or assertions but instead to try to learn from your surroundings (including in this thread) to tailor what you are doing to your own situation. 

For example, if you don't have a sufficient quantity of BTC then the best solution may well be to be buying like a mudder... and if you don't have a lot of cashflow or resources, then the best solution may well be to tailor a reasonable and prudent plan that works for you and your financial/psychological situation.

There are a lot of other examples in which variations of other behaviors/actions may be justified and may or may not include HODL..


Actually $10k or $20k from here does seem possible.. whether we have to wait further or not remains in the air...


Gonna happen?

Gonna happen?

show us king daddy.



 

Explanation

Technically Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency, but that's like calling human beings animals.

Yes, technically we're animals but we like to differentiate between humans and subhuman species.

Similarly, we like to differentiate between Bitcoin and sub-Bitcoin cryptocurrencies.

Don't you think "Bitcoin" is a "Crypto"?
I believe bitcoin is crypto so we can write crypto analyst.
If not, then I can say I am not a robot but a human being. So i can do mistakes.

BTW, Is it your habit to twist every word? no offense, Just curious.

Hm?  I did not know that Plan B analyses anything other than bitcoin.

Why would any of us want to use a vague-ass term, such as "crypto" when we are trying to talk about bitcoin, and someone who analyses bitcoin?

I suppose "technically" if at any point in time, PlanB had actually analyzed any shitcoin - which probably he has done that, then "technically" it would be accurate to label him as a "crypto" analyst... but the way more accurate term would be to proclaim that he is a bitcoin analyst.. bitcoin is his focus, so why not use the most accurate word instead of propagating nonsense and fuzzy thinking to suggest that PlanB is in the business of analyzing anything other than having bitcoin as his main focal point (aka point of reference).

Beginner mistake no?  Should we call that strike one, or are we further down the road in terms of strikes?  or do we just say "that one does not count?"  hahahahahaha.. you get a pass on that?  hahahahahaha  



Hm?  






contemplating the matter..





computing ...






computing....



Of course, many folks appreciate that I give a lot of credence to PlanB and his model, but seems erroneous to me for anyone to be insisting that king daddy has to perform x amount in y time blah blah blah.. even if he ends up being right, we are dealing with aspects of human behavior and some other complex variables contained therein, so in that regard, even if there may well be strong forces that are acting upon bitcoin supply that thereby push BTC prices, economics remains a soft science.. so the science and maths are probabilistic rather than very high levels of certainty that even approach "have to" descriptors..... so hypothetically maybe I could be getting the prediction wrong personally if I were to be ONLY assigning 42% odds (or whatever my odds are?), but maybe at best he is able to assign 80% odds because he has better access to facts and logic, but still 80% is not 100% or even close to 100%... so it does irritate me a bit when peeps overly assign odds, unless there are likely also peeps who are goating PlanB into such assertions or spins upon his work to make them sound as if they have higher certainties than they do.  


That is ridiculous tertius993.  The stock to flow model is amongst the best of the currently valid and credible BTC price prediction models, and surely it has some defects, and personally I believe that it is best coupled by 4 year fractal and exponential s-curve adoption based on network effects and Metcalfe principles - and so just proclaiming that the model is deficient in some kinds of ways (obfuscation in your words) seems as if uie-pooie are either detached from reality, in denial or just getting caught up on personalities... .. fuck PlanB to the extent that he might be bolstering in various ways, yet his data and his various models still speak volumes whether you want to account for them, negate them or not or even to spin your own nonsense (could they be described as models?  the planB is obfuscating model?).. have fun staying poor..  


Oh gawd....

which ones of you are worse...

Option 1)
tertius993

or

Option 2)
Torquey porkey

For sure d_eddie is 99% more worth being a real Satoshi as the rest of all the F***up’s in this world

Explanation

Its not, we are all Satoshi!

And you can't prove hes not.

+111 WOsMerit  for that one d_eddie




Oh gawd....

 











But now upon reflection.. that damned snowflake, aka cAPSLOCK...

















 



#nohomo

https://twitter.com/tuurdemeester/status/1462068666216988690?s=21

The green dildos are back

Explanation

@El duderino_ you from El Dorado city by any chance?
 Just kidding. Whenever I see your name. It remembers me of Eldorado.

The Hidden city of gold.
I believe you are Hodler of Bitcoin.

Hah, sorry, no. I grew up in Europe and the Nazis did a lot more than just kill Jews. But even if you ignore everything they did besides the camps, they were also going after political opponents, gypsies and homosexuals.

Now, personally, I'm not putting out those comparisons. I just think glib dismissal of those comparisons are just that and I'll call them out. That uneasiness you're feeling? That's valid and you need to listen to that voice.

Hopefully this will be the last I'll need to say on this since I think I've covered my points but, again, the easiest way to stop the nazi comparisons is to stop adopting their tactics.

Some of the cheapest "human food" you can get looks dodgier than the "pet food".

Explanation

Yes, that's how I think about it. I wouldn't ever eat it. But I don't think it would hurt me if I ate it.

Same with human flesh. (Most) humans would feel sick to their stomach to even attempt to eat human flesh, for psychological reasons, but it could actually taste delicious. I'd guess it would taste like pork meat.

Speaking of cleanliness products....
I wonder if there's a job for sniffing....ahhhh nevermind...