Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion - page 4566. (Read 26610090 times)

Explanation

 How does Mark not use a decent system for audio over internet?  It's really hard to listen to.

edit: not internet over audio but that would be cool.

 Yeah but they clearly spelled out a-s-s-h-o-l-e without using the word.

Mark Cuban somehow received a new asshole last night, in the form of a forced space-time gravitational anomaly on Twitter, created by the mass of people exposed to his retard takes on Spaces about Bitcoin.

Dude is NGMI.

Explanation

Meant to post this one last night. Interview with Robert Breedlove who I have not heard about before.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_34YjXAU5Y&ab_channel=TomBilyeu

This was an interesting listen, especially his views on inflation, the truth behind Bitcoin divisibility and views on central banking.

But the interviewer seems a bit of a greedy fool and thinks everything Robert says applies to NFTs automatically also even though he never mentions for almost 2 hours.

Eventually Robert drops the bomb when he addresses anything other than Bitcoin in the crypto sphere (1:50:40):

"So many people get lost looking at other alternative crypto assets or NFTs or other projects thinking they have the same trust minimised properties as Bitcoin;
to say that they are truly decentralised, no one has a political attack vector on the network or the good or whatever it may be.

It is my strong opinion that Bitcoin is the only asset that is truly, credible and has exhibited the qualities of decentralisation.
It's undergone a fork war, people have tried to increase the block size, change the supply and Bitcoin is kind of tried and true, it's battle tested, so with NFTS and crypto in general,
I would just say; I don't think decentralisation has been achieved anywhere else.

That is the key difference.

Bitcoin is the one asset that no one can control."

 

And there you have it.

Will listen to some more Robert Breedlove in the future but will avoid that interviewer's channel.

I can't see the word HODL anywhere on the board. Tsk, tsk.

Explanation

With wage slavery all races are slaves.

a nice round of scrabble on sunday would have something now


https://twitter.com/Vizique/status/1448285978582474755

I did like a 4x on my dog investments in the last 2-3 months.    

Bitcoin only did a 2x .    

Explanation

Btw there where a few I wanna merit

But 50/50 a 30ste for some

So sorry

#nohomo

A little game, I’m very curious someone remembers this as well and knows who I’m talking about, my post can be a bit wrong but in bigger lines this is what he was saying kind of.



A remember a post …… written a looong time ago by a member of the WO-thread, a frequent poster, one I not always could say rather he’s a long term believer bull or not….

I do remember the post where he said somewhere half way last bearmarket

This time in a year from now, a lot of WO members will not be active in here anymore or with BTC etc (probably cause he thought we where going way lower as we did and stay there for a long period etc)

I think he suggested a future where BTC was at higher prices like now, but 10-15 years from that post or something…

Sounds like a lot of fucking hard work running this ranch, bro.

I sold some @ $61,400.

Would like to see an ATH next week if i am honest.

This is a test of the emergency fiat system. Keep fiat bank account at a minimum, and if an emergency need arises (car repairs, healthcare, etc.), quick loan provides the necessary cash. Minimum exposure to inflation.

Explanation

It wasn't dumb IMO. The speaker being an important, famous guy in the cryptocurrency world doesn't make him less of a nocoiner if he holds no btc. Even further, if hypothetically someone held, say, 100$ of shitcoins and 0.5$ of corn, I would stretch the term a bit and call them shit-nocoiners. On the contrary, someone holding 100$ of btc and 0.5 of shitcoins could be called a no-shit coiner.

Explanation

Wage slavery