I just found out that i still have some etc (after the @LFC post)....it has some value now, lol (one of the most useless forks).
I better exchange to daddy (or USDC/tether?) asap.
Dang, forgot about ETC. Not sure if I can access it at all now. Never mind, not worth worrying about the small amount I may have.
I just looked at all my shitcoins added together which added to a very small amount of money (relatively speaking) a few months ago, and now the whole thing is up around 15x.. which adds up to a decent amount of money, relatively speaking (at least in terms of dollars). I am still giving few fucks, but part of the being spoiled aspect comes from having a certain amount of valuing wealth in terms of bitcoin rather than either dollars or shitcoins, and I am not even saying that the dollar value of the bitcoin does not matter because measuring the bitcoin in terms of their dollar value does give some kind of way to gauge both the value of the bitcoins and also the value of other assets, currencies and even the various shitcoins that I hold.
Actually, relative to the dollar, maybe even most shitcoins will do better - even if they are likely to continue to lose value relative to bitcoin in the long term even while appearing to gain some value (relative to bitcoin) in the short term.
Jelly that you do not seem to know how to take that nonsense to some other thread.
Gets a bit old, phillip..
♫ BITCOIN! BITCOIN! , DONT BE BUYING SHITCOIN!!! ♫ ♪ ...
Even though I react to post, and call names to you ill-focused shitstirrers, I really doubt that I am emotional about the whole matter, even if you might be reading emotion into the situation.
Yeah his next one is going to be a really, really, really long post.
Length would naturally follow in something that needs to be backed up by evidence or discussion in order to attempt to clarify the point(s).
Yeah, sure, not everyone (even here) realize that it is NOT very healthy for your own brain or even likely your investment portfolio to be getting too distracted by shitcoins, so yeah historically, we have already seen that a lot of folks do like to get distracted by shitcoins, even in this thread, and some of them do end up getting fucked pretty bad because of their weaknesses in getting distracted, so sure, who knows which one(s) of you fucks are going to end up getting fucked this time.. hahahha.. Don't come come running to this thread for help after you get fucked based on your inabilities to focus ur lil selfies... #no homo.
I guess you are the one that want the posts to keep coming up. As you keep quoting them. \
Now you want to blame me for your feelings that you have to defend your shitty, off topic posts? Jbreher used to make the same kinds of nonsense assertions attempting to defend why he was talking about shitcoins, and perhaps he is going to come back because his favorite shitcoin, also known as bsv, has been pumpening in recent times.
Well, that's good.
At least some of us can be less mad at you in regards to that ideological position, even though I was not making any claim about your ideology but instead your wanting to post off topic shit in order to edumacate us in ways that you believe that your shitcoin is supposedly related to bitcoin because you have been making more bitcoin from it blah blah blah.
Pay the gear pay the power.
Convert the coins to BTC and fiat.
This advice holds for all coins except BTC as hodl all you can if you mine btc.
My coin holdings are more than 95% BTC
Yes.. and you are concluding that your information is relevant to this thread, and I am suggesting that there might be a better place to post. You can do what you want, and we surely can have differing opinions.. that's for sure.
Your perspective here comes off as a bit strange.
You want to suggest that posts need to be responded to in a "timely" manner? Otherwise, they should no longer be responded to and worse yet, quoted?
Seems a bit strange to me, but sure, you are "entitled" to express your opinion, which you have even if it seems a bit dumb and opportunistic to me.. because sometimes people (including yours truly) might not be able to read or respond to posts within the timeline that you would like to impose upon "us" (royal of course), and you seem to be suggesting that it is disingenuous or whatever to quote an older post that might have not been seen earlier. By the way, sometimes members will cite topics from several weeks or months earlier because they had not seen those posts earlier, even though I will concede that there does seem to be a wee bit of recentcy bias in this thread in terms of sticking to topics that are "currently trending" or whatever.
In any event, I do consider that you are grasping at straws a bit or maybe even merely arguing for the mere sake of it when you are trying to oppose my response based on its timeliness. Sure, through the years, I have surely witnessed more ridiculous claims than that timeliness claim through the years, but you do have a decent running in such ridiculous competition at this point with that assertion that responses to posts need to be made in a timely manner (whatever that means?) ..